24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3373  |  回复: 21
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

einstain666

木虫 (著名写手)

[求助] 第一次投稿,等了一个半月,有了回复意见,不知道这意味着什么? 已有11人参与

只有一个审稿人意见吗?其他的审稿人还会给意见吗?这是大修还是小修?求帮助
Dear Authors,

We have received a referee’s report on the above article, which you have submitted to Special Issue on the 9th Asia Pacific Fusion Association Conference. A copy of the report is attached. The referee has made several suggestions (mandatory) to refine the manuscript. Please make the suggested changes and upload a revised version of article at your earliest convenience. If the revised version of the article is not uploaded until 60 days, the article will be automatically discarded.
Sincerely,

Editor-in-Chief, Special Issue on the 9th Asia Pacific Fusion Association Conference

This manuscript reports one of basic process of optical system in FIR polarimeter/interferometer. Although this process is relatively well known in the field some detail discussion would be informative to the researchers in the field. I found below issues to be checked and corrected before the publication.
(1) Over whole there are many sentences to be revised due to the ambiguity of English expression and typos. I didn’t make list of this since English expert should look at this.
(2) for equation (2): this equation is valid for the one-side concave and the other side flat mirror cavity (hemispherical resonator case), So is this system this case? Or need explain for the validity.
(3) For Equation (11): right hand side (f-z2) seems to be replaced by z2
(4) For Equation (12): right hand side denominator ‘f’ seems to be replaced by ‘z2’
(5) In chapter V ‘Lenses choice’ “…shouldn’t exceed 12.4 mm” need addition explanation.
(6) For Equation (13) parenthesis need to be checked for end part.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

四叶草李水

金虫 (小有名气)

加油,楼主
7楼2013-12-18 22:35:49
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

四叶草李水

金虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
einstain666: 金币+4, ★★★★★最佳答案 2013-12-20 12:43:32
你投的哪个期刊啊,有些期刊就是只有一个审稿人的。比方说APL,POP。看审稿人的意见,主要就是几个公式还有英语写作的问题。好好改改,应该问题不大。英语嘛,又不是我们的母语,他们还是会在一定程度上表示理解的。仔细改改吧,好好回复审稿人意见。。
20楼2013-12-20 12:36:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 einstain666 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见