24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

hto110

铜虫 (小有名气)

应助: 1 (幼儿园)
金币: 87.7
帖子: 152
在线: 63小时
虫号: 979237

[交流] particuology，major revision但给的时间很短，是只要点对点的修改就可以了吗？

编辑给的回信：
Thank you very much for submitting the above manuscript, which has been peer reviewed by referees. Please refer to the following comments and suggestions according to our referees and make major revisions in response to them.

At the same time, English expression of this manuscript is not suitable for publication. Please improve it while revising.

Please carefully address each issue raised in the comments and highlight each change you have made in the text.

When submitting the revised manuscript, please also prepare a separate note which should:

a) outline each change made (point by point) as raised in the reviewer comments,

AND/OR

b) provide a suitable rebuttal to each reviewer comment not addressed in the text.

To submit your revision, please do the following:

1. Go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/partic/
2. Enter your login details
3. Click [Author Login]
This takes you to the Author Main Menu.
4. Click [Submissions Needing Revision]

Please note: Your revision will be due by
Dec 31, 2013.

major revision是大修，但给的时间也太短了吧，见其他杂志给的一般都一两个月。

[ Last edited by hto110 on 2013-12-18 at 13:40 ]

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

青椒八年已不青，大家都被折磨成啥样了？已经有5人回复
青年基金C终止已经有3人回复
26申博求博导推荐-遥感图像处理方向已经有4人回复
限项规定已经有7人回复
救命帖已经有8人回复
招博士已经有4人回复
西南交通大学国家级人才团队2026年博士研究生招生（考核制）—机械、材料、力学方向已经有3人回复
英文综述是否需要润色及查重已经有5人回复
为什么nbs上溴没有产物点出现呢已经有9人回复
最失望的一年已经有18人回复

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2013-12-18 10:26:15

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

hto110

铜虫 (小有名气)

应助: 1 (幼儿园)
金币: 87.7
帖子: 152
在线: 63小时
虫号: 979237

引用回帖:

3楼: Originally posted by lx882211 at 2013-12-20 18:55:35
楼主抓紧时间吧，做不了实验也要委婉的说，以后继续研究什么的。。。另外英语是大碍！我也是，直接退回来了

嗯嗯是啊，

回复此楼

6楼2013-12-21 09:40:14

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

查看全部 6 个回答

hto110

铜虫 (小有名气)

应助: 1 (幼儿园)
金币: 87.7
帖子: 152
在线: 63小时
虫号: 979237

其中一个审稿人的一条意见：
The study would be much stronger if they authors had measured the behaviour of both a spherical and a non-spherical particle type within one Geldart category. Now they have just one type within each Geldart category, and compare it with literature findings. However, it remains unclear to the reader whether the differences are indeed caused by a different sphericity, and which differences are causes by a different.
这是要补实验吗，时间这么短，如果要补实验的话真是着急啊！！