| 查看: 1423 | 回复: 5 | |||
[交流]
particuology,major revision但给的时间很短,是只要点对点的修改就可以了吗?
|
|
编辑给的回信: Thank you very much for submitting the above manuscript, which has been peer reviewed by referees. Please refer to the following comments and suggestions according to our referees and make major revisions in response to them. At the same time, English expression of this manuscript is not suitable for publication. Please improve it while revising. Please carefully address each issue raised in the comments and highlight each change you have made in the text. When submitting the revised manuscript, please also prepare a separate note which should: a) outline each change made (point by point) as raised in the reviewer comments, AND/OR b) provide a suitable rebuttal to each reviewer comment not addressed in the text. To submit your revision, please do the following: 1. Go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/partic/ 2. Enter your login details 3. Click [Author Login] This takes you to the Author Main Menu. 4. Click [Submissions Needing Revision] Please note: Your revision will be due by Dec 31, 2013. major revision是大修,但给的时间也太短了吧,见其他杂志给的一般都一两个月。 [ Last edited by hto110 on 2013-12-18 at 13:40 ] |
» 猜你喜欢
青椒八年已不青,大家都被折磨成啥样了?
已经有4人回复
救命帖
已经有8人回复
招博士
已经有4人回复
限项规定
已经有6人回复
西南交通大学国家级人才团队2026年博士研究生招生(考核制)—机械、材料、力学方向
已经有3人回复
英文综述是否需要润色及查重
已经有5人回复
为什么nbs上溴 没有产物点出现呢
已经有9人回复
最失望的一年
已经有18人回复
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
邀您投稿 Polymers 特刊
+1/483
nanomaterials特刊:纳米材料在电化学能源领域的应用(SCI 中科院三区,IF4.5)征稿
+5/290
【2026/2027 哈工大计算机类博士招生】
+1/97
深圳大学张雷教授课题组诚聘博士后
+1/75
上海交通大学变革分子学中心申涛课题组2026秋季入学推荐-考核制博士招生(有机)
+1/74
大连理工大学智能系统实验室优秀硕博研究生招生
+1/73
南昌大学化学化工学院付拯江教授拟招收“申请-考核”制博士研究生
+1/72
[长期合作招募] 同济大学肖倩老师团队诚邀港澳学者学术交流
+1/53
[长期合作招募] 同济大学肖倩老师团队诚邀港澳学者学术交流
+1/25
专科起点双非硕士,申博求建议
+1/20
论文投稿散金祈愿-电机学报
+2/20
顾敏院士课题组招收2026级光学工程专业博士研究生-上海理工大学智能科技学院
+1/20
博士后, 博士招生 美国大纽约地区 NJIT
+1/15
93年坐标北京,征女友
+1/14
2026申博自荐 本硕双一流学科 纳米药物递送方向 一篇一区TOP 两个国家奖学金
+1/14
顺磁计算交流
+1/7
中国计量大学叶德茂课题组招收博士研究生(欢迎计算机类、电子信息类等专业)
+1/4
广东以色列理工学院博士招生-风电场流动数字孪生
+1/4
换工作
+1/2
南方科技大学田雷蕾课题组招收2026年博士生
+1/1
|
其中一个审稿人的一条意见: The study would be much stronger if they authors had measured the behaviour of both a spherical and a non-spherical particle type within one Geldart category. Now they have just one type within each Geldart category, and compare it with literature findings. However, it remains unclear to the reader whether the differences are indeed caused by a different sphericity, and which differences are causes by a different. 这是要补实验吗,时间这么短,如果要补实验的话真是着急啊!! |
2楼2013-12-18 13:41:48
3楼2013-12-20 18:55:35
4楼2013-12-20 19:45:46
5楼2013-12-21 09:37:33
6楼2013-12-21 09:40:14













回复此楼

