24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1169  |  回复: 5
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

yfsuperuser

木虫 (正式写手)

[求助] 审稿意见和编辑意见,有点小糊涂。该怎么办?

Attached below is the comment provided by a selected reviewer for the above-mentioned manuscript, which has been considered for publication in Genes & Genetic Systems (GGS). I was hoping to obtain an additional reviewer, but all other candidate reviewers refused to do the reviewing. It now appears that the waiting is too long.

The only reviewer, who responded and provided a comment, raises a number of major issues that preclude the acceptance of the submitted manuscript in its present form. After reading the manuscript myself, I agree with the reviewer, and find the present work unsuitable for GGS. Revisions required to address all the issues raised by the reviewer would be substantial, and my editorial judgment would therefore be a rejection. Although the outcome with regard to this submission is not favorable, we trust that you will find the comment of value.


第一段明明说了which has been considered for publication in Genes & Genetic Systems (GGS).
但是第二段又说 my editorial judgment would therefore be a rejection.

这种情况怎么办?能否按照修改意见大修后再投?
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

星野朔夜

金虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
第一句是说已经考虑过是否在此刊物上发表,后一句才是审稿结果
3楼2013-11-28 13:31:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 6 个回答

kingki

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
yfsuperuser: 金币+5, ★★★★★最佳答案, 非常感谢 2013-11-28 14:14:56
评审给的意见太多,尽管编辑认为有价值,但最终给你据稿。你可以根据意见好好修改再投试试
飞越无限
2楼2013-11-28 13:29:01
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

LT_FU

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
yfsuperuser: 金币+10, ★★★★★最佳答案, 谢谢啊! 2013-11-28 14:14:12
which has been considered for publication in Genes & Genetic Systems (GGS),这句话只是编辑对于要外审的文章的一句普通的描述,就是说你的这篇文章编辑部考虑将你的文章送审,认为有发表的潜力,但是否发表取决于审稿意见。
After reading the manuscript myself, I agree with the reviewer, and find the present work unsuitable for GGS. Revisions required to address all the issues raised by the reviewer would be substantial, and my editorial judgment would therefore be a rejection.
这句话才是正儿八经的审稿意见

当然,你可以按照当前的审稿意见修改,修改完了再投,除非该期刊明确表述不再接收你这篇被拒的文章
4楼2013-11-28 13:31:20
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zh10246

铁杆木虫 (文坛精英)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
修改完了再投,或者你给他提供几个candidate reviewers
5楼2013-11-28 13:55:01
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
信息提示
请填处理意见