24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3176  |  回复: 13
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

xiejuan123

铜虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] cg主编让我就上一篇杂志的拒稿审稿意见回信,怎么办?

我先投的Chemistry - A European Journal,被拒了,又改投Crystal Growth & Design,投稿时有个选项问是否曾投过其他杂志,我选了yes.结果投完后主编写信要我把Chemistry - A European Journal的审稿意见发过去后。我发过去了。今天又接到Crystal Growth & Design主编的来信,需要我就这些Chemistry - A European Journal的审稿意见,点对点的回答,都对文章做了那些改变。要求内容如下:
“We kindly ask you to provide a point by point response/rebuttal to reviewers' comments and list any changes made to the manuscript submitted to us.”

看到信件后我就惊呆了。好后悔怎么我怎么就在提交稿件是说我投过其他文章?不说不就没这么多事了?问题就在于之前拒稿的审稿意见没有细说,所以我就只是美化了几个图形,改变文献格式,又检查了下语法。没有就内容上进行改动。现在都不知道怎么回cg主编的信件。尤其是第二个审稿人,对我在文章中说的镧系收缩导致的配位化合物结构发生变化这一点,他到底是觉得理论提出的不对还是说这个理论例子太多,没什么新颖性。读不懂呀!求大牛帮我想怎么写cg主编回信!!!
Chemistry - A European Journal的一个审稿人对文章提的缺点是:
“Although the chemistry presented is well done the results are not major surprising. The shown luminescence is rather routine. Therefore I recommend a publication in a more specialized journal.”

第二个审稿人所提的意见是:
This is a sound well carried out study in the field of supramolecular chemistry of rare earth complexes. However it lacks the impact and wide interest required for papers in CEJ. The most interesting feature is the ligand synthesis which is very compact. Although the authors emphasize the change in coord no as the Ln contraction takes over, there are numerous examples where this does not occur, and it is this unexpected aspect of Ln coordination chemistry that adds to its appeal.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

迅疾之风

铜虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
xiejuan123: 金币+10, ★★★很有帮助, 谢谢 2013-11-25 09:19:22
第一个审稿人觉得你的文章研究面比较专业,不是很多人感兴趣的类型,建议你投更专业而不是像CEJ这样面很宽的杂质。第二个审稿人觉得你的文章结果没什么意义
没有航标的河流
5楼2013-11-23 11:03:00
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 xiejuan123 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见