| ²é¿´: 1359 | »Ø¸´: 12 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | |||
aaa_dujiang½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
|
[ÇóÖú]
Éó¸åÈËÒâ¼ûÔõô»Ø¸´°¡£¿µÚÒ»´Î Çó´ó¼Ò°ï°ïæ
|
||
|
µÚÒ»´Î û¾Ñé Çó¸÷λ¿´¿´ÕâÊÇʲôÒâ˼£¿¸ÃÈçºÎ»Ø¸´£¿£¿×öµÄÊǰü¸²²ÄÁÏ 1) what does the 3% perform like the uncoated? Is 2% the anomaly or 3%? 2) is the M on the surface as a series of dispersed nanocrystals (typically sitting on the highest activity sites) or a more uniform thin film coating? 3) I'd expect no change in rate capability - good plot (Fig 4) 4) is there a coating level where M appeared in the XRD patterns? |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
265Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
085700×ÊÔ´Óë»·¾³308Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸¼ªÁÖ´óѧ²ÄÁÏѧ˶321Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
286·ÖÈ˹¤ÖÇÄÜרҵÇëÇóµ÷¼ÁÔ¸Òâ¿ç¿¼£¡
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
329Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ÉêÇë»Ø¸åÑÓÆÚÒ»¸öÔ£¬±à¼Í¬ÒâÁË¡£µ«ÏµÍ³ÉϵÄʱ¼äû±ä£¬¸ø±à¼ÓÖдÓʼþÁË£¬Ã»»Ø¸´
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏѧ˶318Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Öйúº£Ñó´óѧ£¬ÉúÎïѧ£¬301·Ö£¬Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
081700»¯¹¤Ñ§Ë¶µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹ØÉ̼ÒÍÆ¼ö: (ÎÒÒ²ÒªÔÚÕâÀïÍÆ¹ã)
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
Éó¸åÒâ¼ûÀïÓиöÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼ûÊÇÂÒÂ룬Ôõô°ì
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
´óÐÞ ÔõôÐÞ¸ÄÂÛÎÄÒÔ¼°»Ø¸´Éó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼û
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
´ó¼Ò°ï°ï棬¿´¿´Éó¸åÒâ¼û£¬Ð»Ð»Ð»Ð»~~~
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ÈçºÎ»Ø¸´Éó¸åÈËÒâ¼û
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
Çë°ïæ¿´¿´Éó¸åÈËдµÄÉó¸åÒâ¼ûÊÇʲôÒâ˼°¡£¿
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
Éó¸åÈËÒâ¼ûÈçºÎ»Ø¸´
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
¸ÃÈçºÎ¾Ü¾ø×öÉó¸åÈË
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
ÈçºÎ»Ø¸´Éó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼û
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
ÈçºÎ»Ø¸´Éó¸åÈËÒâ¼û
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
Çë½ÌAppliced optics ÐÞ¸ÄÒâ¼ûÖÐΪʲôֻ¿´µ½Ò»¸öÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼û£¿
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
Ôõô»Ø¸´Éó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼û
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
Çó¸ßÈ˰ïæ·ÖÎöÏÂAPLÉó¸åÒâ¼û
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
ÈçºÎ»Ø¸´Éó¸åÈËÌá³öµÄÒâ¼û£¨Óï·¨´íÎ󣩣¿
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
¼ÆËã»úרҵ°ïæ¿´ÏÂÕâÌõÒâ¼ûÔõô»Ø¸´
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
Éó¸åÒâ¼ûÔõô»Ø¸´
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿Âé·³°ïæ¿´¿´ÎÒµÄÉó¸åÒâ¼ûÔõô»Ø¸´°¡£¬¹ØÓÚSEIĤ
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
Ôõô»Ø¸´Éó¸åÈË£¿
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
Çë´ó¼Ò°ïæ¿´¿´ÈçºÎ»Ø¸´Éó¸åÒâ¼û
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
Éó¸åÒâ¼û»ØÀ´£¬Ò»¸öÉó¸åÈËÈþݣ¬±à¼Ëµ´óÐÞ£¬´ó¼Ò°ïÎÒ¿´¿´Ï£Íû´ó²»
ÒѾÓÐ24È˻ظ´
Éó¸åÈËÒâ¼ûÈçºÎ»Ø¸´£¿
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
wangchh
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 4 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 4886.9
- É¢½ð: 232
- Ìû×Ó: 456
- ÔÚÏß: 147.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 438364
- ×¢²á: 2007-09-21
- רҵ: ´ß»¯»¯Ñ§
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
aaa_dujiang: ½ð±Ò+5, ¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï×î¼Ñ´ð°¸ 2013-11-16 11:32:58
aaa_dujiang: ½ð±Ò+5, ¡ï¡ï¡ïºÜÓаïÖú 2013-11-16 11:40:53
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
aaa_dujiang: ½ð±Ò+5, ¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï×î¼Ñ´ð°¸ 2013-11-16 11:32:58
aaa_dujiang: ½ð±Ò+5, ¡ï¡ï¡ïºÜÓаïÖú 2013-11-16 11:40:53
|
ÎÒ²»ÊÇ×ö°ü¸²²ÄÁϵ쬵«ÊÇÉó¸åÒâ¼ûµ¹Êǻظ´ÁËÓÐһЩ¡£»ù±¾ÔÔò¾ÍÊÇ£¬Õë¶ÔÎÊÌâÒ»¶ÔÒ»£¬ÇÐĪÑÜÉúÐÂÎÊÌ⣬»Ø´ðÑÔ¼òÒâê࣬²»Çå³þ»òÕß²»ÖªµÀҪ˵Ã÷£¬ÇÐĪºýŪÉó¸åÈË£¬ËûÃǺܶàʱºò¿´¸ö̬¶È¡£ 1) what does the 3% perform like the uncoated? Is 2% the anomaly or 3%? ÄÇÄã¾Í»Ø´ðÊÇʲô¾ÍºÃ¡£ºóÃæÕâ¸öÄã¾Í¸æËßËû2%»¹ÊÇ3%¾ÍÐУ¬²»ÓýâÊÍÔÒò¡£ 2) is the M on the surface as a series of dispersed nanocrystals (typically sitting on the highest activity sites) or a more uniform thin film coating? ¾ÍÑ¡ÔñÒ»¸ö¾ÍÐУ¬Èç¹ûÁ½¸ö¶¼²»ÊÇ£¬¾Í˵Ã÷ÄãÈÏΪµÄÄǸö¡£ 3) I'd expect no change in rate capability - good plot (Fig 4) Õâ¸öºÃÏñÊÇÔÞͬÄãµÄfig4£¬ÈôÊÇ£¬Äã²»Óûشð£¬×î¶àд¸öthank you for your comment. 4) is there a coating level where M appeared in the XRD patterns? ÄãÖ»Òª»Ø´ðYes»òÕßNo¾ÍÐС£ |
3Â¥2013-11-12 11:03:53
aaa_dujiang
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 6 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 890.5
- É¢½ð: 651
- ºì»¨: 18
- Ìû×Ó: 741
- ÔÚÏß: 365.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1290235
- ×¢²á: 2011-05-09
- רҵ: µç»¯Ñ§
4Â¥2013-11-12 13:16:06
tangzhonghua
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 16 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 4026.5
- ºì»¨: 3
- Ìû×Ó: 2050
- ÔÚÏß: 59.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1104338
- ×¢²á: 2010-09-20
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ºËÎïÀí

5Â¥2013-11-12 14:08:07
aaa_dujiang
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 6 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 890.5
- É¢½ð: 651
- ºì»¨: 18
- Ìû×Ó: 741
- ÔÚÏß: 365.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1290235
- ×¢²á: 2011-05-09
- רҵ: µç»¯Ñ§
6Â¥2013-11-12 22:36:28













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥