| 查看: 2077 | 回复: 1 | ||
grace040802木虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
editor 的修改意见 有几条怎么回复？
|
|
昨天投的稿件，当天晚上就收到editor的major revision的意见。其中有些意见很难以回答故求助之，多谢虫友们！Blessing!!! A DETAILED ANSWER TO ALL THESE QUERIES MUST BE PROVIDED AS AN ATTACHMENT TO YOUR RESUBMISSION. FAILURE TO DO SO WILL RESULT IN REJECTION OF THE PAPER WITHOUT A TECHNICAL REVIEW. 1. YOU MUST MAKE SURE YOUR ENGLISH IS READABLE. If your English is difficult to understand we will REJECT the paper without technical review until it is readable by the reviewer. If you need English assistance you may refer to a English language service who will provide the correction service for a fee 这条是在说我的英语太chinese了. 用什么可以判断文章 is readable by the reviewer? 找个老外来修改文章并注释？ 2. IF YOU DO NOT GIVE A MECHANISM FOR YOUR OBSERVED RESULTS WE WILL REJECT THE PAPER AS NOT BEING OF JOURNAL QUALITY. MECHANISM IS MANDATORY. Conclusions must be comprehensive and not written like a report. PLEASE ALSO CLEARLY INDICATE THE INDUSTRIAL VALUE/RELEVANCE FOR THESE APPROACHES DESCRIBED IN YOUR PAPER. Please also state in the first few paras as to why this work is not the same as that of others and what knowledge is it adding that is not already available that contributes to the archival literature 陈述工作与他人不一样的地方。 3. WE TAKE PLAGIARISM SERIOUSLY. Your similarity report MUST not exceed 5% for us to consider a technical review http://www.ithenticate.com/, Please use the ithenitcate software to check your paper before submission. 这个软件用它这个链接是要收费的，不知道您是否用过ithenitcate software？ 4. WE RECOMMEND THAT YOU download any of the free articles using this link http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/cited/LMMP.pdf, Please look through the pdf TABLE OF CONTENTS attachment for other companion papers published in mamp that may assist in the relevance of your paper. 5. 50% of the references must be from the last 5 years. YOUR PAPER MUST NOT EXCEED 15 TYPED PAGES INCLUDING FIGURES, SO PLEASE REMOVE UNNECESSARY FIGURES AND ENSURE THAT THEY ARE OF THE RIGHT SIZE AND NOT OVERSIZED. IF YOU HAVE TOO MANY PAGES THE PUBLICATION OF YOUR ARTICLE UPON ACCEPTANCE WILL BE DELAYED INDEFINITELY DUE TO SPACE CONSTRAINTS. YOU CAN SHRINK ALL THE FIGURES TO SAVE SPACE. MAKE SURE THAT YOUR FIGURES HAVE PROPER LEGENDS, MICRON MARKERS AND IS REPRODUCIBLE LEGIBLY. WE ALLOW A MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF 3500 WORDS FOR TEXT AND 8 FIGURES/TABLES. ANYTHING MORE THAN THAT WILL BE REJECTED, SO CHOOSE YOUR TABLES AND FIGURES WISELY 共13篇since2009，还差2篇即可满足要求。这个容易搞定。 6. Only single keywords must be used not combinations of words- e.g, electrode, discharge, machining and not electrode discharge machining. Reference citations must be completely spelt out – NO abbreviations allowed for journal citations. Please reduce the length of your title to no more than 12 words and it MUST emphasize PROCESSING 文章中没有关于process的论述 7. Please provide email address for each author and at least two different email addresses for the primary point of contact 8. Your paper must have a significant content ON MANUFACTURING PROCESSES and CANNOT be mere modeling or properties AS IT WILL BE REJECTED- there are other journals to focus on those issues. If there is NO materials content your paper will be REJECTED WE DO NOT ACCEPT PAPERS ON MERE PROPERTIES. There are other journals for that- so make sure there is a strong processing content 这个是一个很大的问题，因为我的文章里面没有process，仅仅只是hot compression。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
怎么看青基中了没有啊
已经有6人回复
-
国社科又开始会评了，不知道这次命运如何
已经有11人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有3人回复
-
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有19人回复
-
基金未中，这种答复是模板吗？
已经有7人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 回复审稿意见，需要把修改后的内容复制到意见下面吗
已经有4人回复
- IEEE TRANS审稿人的comments怎么response？
已经有9人回复
- 论文修改意见的回复
已经有5人回复
- 大家帮忙看看意见，谁有类似的回复，请帮忙提供点意见，谢谢！
已经有7人回复
- 急求，状态变为Submissions needing revision，审稿意见的问题。
已经有3人回复
- 中文期刊修改意见的回复
已经有10人回复
- 如何回复修改意见！！
已经有4人回复
- 英文论文修改回复怎么写
已经有5人回复
- 请问评审意见回来后，Technical Editor的答复等待中是什么意思？
已经有12人回复
- 《电子与信息学报》能否回避指定审稿人，或者送审时会选择作者推荐的审稿人吗
已经有5人回复
- 论文大修，修改意见回复
已经有14人回复
- 请教Appliced optics 修改意见中为什么只看到一个审稿人的意见？
已经有9人回复
- Comments to editor 怎么回复？
已经有8人回复
- 审稿comments里面有几条不明白？
已经有8人回复
- 回复修改意见一般用第一人称还是第三人称
已经有4人回复
- 大修修回under review 一个月了，心里开始担心
已经有77人回复
- 按照审稿人的意见进行了修改之后，编辑的回复
已经有3人回复
- 如何回复论文修改意见
已经有9人回复
- 论文修改时，对拒稿的意见怎么回复？（两个接收，一个拒绝）
已经有50人回复
- 写修改信时要把reviewer的意见原样粘上，然后一一回复吗？
已经有12人回复
- 修改意见回复
已经有18人回复
- 求修改意见的回复的模板
已经有3人回复
2楼2013-10-10 14:40:47
10