24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 3454  |  回复: 12

liuyalihd

铜虫 (小有名气)

[交流] 写修改信时要把reviewer的意见原样粘上,然后一一回复吗?

1)写修改信,要把reviewer的意见一字不落的粘上,然后每个修改意见后另起一行,写我的change?这样会不会觉得很乱?

2)另外说我英文不好,我该如何回复?请给个范例呀,我英文真不好!
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Addiee

木虫 (职业作家)

80后-我们都是好孩子

1)当然要那么做了,呵呵 要不然人家怎么知道你怎么改的呢
2)实事求是
幸福是个比较级,要有东西垫底才感觉的到。
2楼2010-09-15 16:25:38
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

liuyalihd

铜虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by Addiee at 2010-09-15 16:25:38:
1)当然要那么做了,呵呵 要不然人家怎么知道你怎么改的呢
2)实事求是

关于1)
   那么审稿意见太多了,我用>号把审稿意见统统标示上,好与我的回复 区分开?
  如何把审稿意见和我写的回复区分开?
  能给个简单样子?
3楼2010-09-15 16:30:01
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

liuyalihd

铜虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by Addiee at 2010-09-15 16:25:38:
1)当然要那么做了,呵呵 要不然人家怎么知道你怎么改的呢
2)实事求是

关于2)
   我要把我英文修正的每一句都列出来吗?改很多句就列很多句?
4楼2010-09-15 16:31:18
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Addiee

木虫 (职业作家)

80后-我们都是好孩子

liuyalihd(金币+10):大致知道了 2010-09-15 16:34:23
前面先写上审稿意见
如:
Review1:。。。
然后你另起一行
Answer1:。。。
我觉得这样应该就可以了
反正中文的是这样做的
幸福是个比较级,要有东西垫底才感觉的到。
5楼2010-09-15 16:32:30
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Addiee

木虫 (职业作家)

80后-我们都是好孩子

引用回帖:
Originally posted by liuyalihd at 2010-09-15 16:31:18:


关于2)
   我要把我英文修正的每一句都列出来吗?改很多句就列很多句?

应该是根据审稿意见的那些都要列出来
至于只改了某个单词、词组的应该不用吧
幸福是个比较级,要有东西垫底才感觉的到。
6楼2010-09-15 16:33:47
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yensh

金虫 (文坛精英)

优秀版主

引用回帖:
Originally posted by liuyalihd at 2010-09-15 16:24:15:
1)写修改信,要把reviewer的意见一字不落的粘上,然后每个修改意见后另起一行,写我的change?这样会不会觉得很乱?

2)另外说我英文不好,我该如何回复?请给个范例呀,我英文真不好!

这类回复信件版内有一些,建议检索一下~~~~
ID已经更换,此ID作废
7楼2010-09-15 17:03:42
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hudasuhai

木虫 (著名写手)

liuyalihd(金币+10):谢谢 2010-09-16 20:11:27
1. 回复信件没有必要把所做的修改一一标明:
你只要把改动的地方用显眼的颜色标出就可以,并在前面说明改动的地方已经用不同颜色标出
2. 有必要把专家的意见粘帖到修改说明上,而且要对应一一回答,修改说明要多写,态度的象征
3. 建议1个月左右再投回,不要着急传回去!
平地拔锄头,步行骑水牛,人从桥上过,桥流水不流
8楼2010-09-15 17:14:16
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

duxin_30

铜虫 (正式写手)

liuyalihd(金币+10):谢谢 2010-09-16 20:12:10
引用回帖:
Originally posted by liuyalihd at 2010-09-15 16:24:15:
1)写修改信,要把reviewer的意见一字不落的粘上,然后每个修改意见后另起一行,写我的change?这样会不会觉得很乱?

2)另外说我英文不好,我该如何回复?请给个范例呀,我英文真不好!

1: 如果reviewer的意见是简明扼要的按1,2,3,4这样列出来的,可以考虑一条一条跟,如果是一大段的话我觉得就按中心意思提下就行(反正我是这么搞的),比如以前有篇文章的意见里有一个是关于我的实验和我引的一个文献的实验的区别,审稿人认为结果很相似并且说了一大段,我回这一点的时候小标题只用了几个字:About xxx's experiment,一样通过了,关键是你怎么回答,形式一般不是很重要了。

2: 把文中的语法错误什么的好好改改,然后说文中的拼写语法错误已经改正等等,一定要改好,不行就找英语好的人帮你改
9楼2010-09-15 17:26:23
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

dzckeyan

木虫 (正式写手)

大家帮我看看我该怎么写修改说明?

I have received the reviews for your manuscript, "****", which you submitted to ****.

Based on these reviews, your manuscript is accepted for publication pending receipt of a revised manuscript. When preparing your revised manuscript, carefully consider the attached reviewer comments, and submit a list of revisions based on the comments. Your list of responses should be uploaded as a file in addition to your revised manuscript.

Go to the link below for the Author's Instructions. If the Author's Instructions link does not work, copy and paste the link into your web browser.

Author's Instructions: ***


Submit your revised manuscript to:

***

Your username is: ***
Your password is: ****

Click "Author Login" to submit your revision.

I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Best regards,


***
Editor-in-Chief
***


COMMENTS FOR THE AUTHOR:

You must have a native English speaker correct the grammar and syntax.

Rewrite the abstract using numbers to tell your story.

Reformat this ms. using the instructions on this website.

Delete subheadings.


EDITORIAL REQUIREMENTS

Yes  No  N/A

(x)       ()       ()  Manuscript Length is Appropriate
(x)       ()       ()  Manuscript Prepared According to Instructions
()       (x)       ()        Clearly written with proper English grammar and syntax.
()       (x)       ()        Introductory paragraphs are concise and  appropriate
(x)       ()       ()  References cited to current studies in introduction.
(x)       ()       ()        There is a clear purpose & hypothesis for the study.
(x)       ()       ()        Sampling is described.
(x)       ()       ()        Methods & Materials section is detailed so that the study could be repeated.
(x)       ()       ()        Analytical methods are described or provided by readily available reference(s).
()       (x)       ()        Limits of detection are reported.
()       (x)       ()        Fortified sample recoveries are reported.
()       ()       (x)        Statistics are appropriate and are referenced in the Materials & Methods section.
(x)       ()       ()        Data are compared to other studies.
()       (x)       ()        References are current and appropriate
(x)       ()       ()  Significance of findings are described.

TECHNICAL MERIT

Check one rank in each category
      1 = poor, 5 = excellent

1   2   3   4   5                          
()  ()  ()  (x)  ()  Clarity                       
()  ()  ()  ()  (x)  Technical Quality         
()  ()  ()  (x)  ()  Originality                    
()  ()  ()  ()  (x)  Novelty.
()  ()  ()  ()  (x)  Data interpretation is appropriate.
()  ()  ()  (x)  ()  Scientific value


SIGNIFICANCE
()   None
()   Local
(x)   National
()   Regional
()   Global
The first three paragraphs in Materials and Methods should be in the Introduction which should be edited for length.
Manuscript exceeds the length of 8 pages as stated in the Instructions to Authors, which see.
References should be limited to one page with older references cited to Reviews.


这样写吗?
Comment:
You must have a native English speaker correct the grammar and syntax.
Response: Yes. We invited several native English speakers to check and revise the language errors.  And we asked some professors who are skilled authors to revised the mannuscript.

Comment (continued):
Rewrite the abstract using numbers to tell your story.
Response: Yes. The abstract was rewrited using numbers.

Comment (continued):
Reformat this ms. using the instructions on this website.
Response: Yes. The revised manuscript was reformated following the Author's Instructions.

Comment (continued):
Delete subheadings.
Response: Yes. The subheadings were deleted.

Editoral requirements
Yes  No  N/A
()    (x)    ()        Introductory paragraphs are concise and  appropriate
()    (x)    ()        Limits of detection are reported.
()    (x)    ()        Fortified sample recoveries are reported.
()    ()    (x)        Statistics are appropriate and are referenced in the Materials & Methods section.
()    (x)    ()        References are current and appropriate
Response: We reorganized and condensed introductory paragraphs.
Limits of detection are added and reported now.
Fortified sample recoveries are reported now.
Statistics are appropriate and are referenced now.
Latest references are added and older ones cited to reviews.

Other comments and suggestions:
The first three paragraphs in Materials and Methods should be in the Introduction which should be edited for length.
Response: Yes. We did it follows the comment and suggestion.

Manuscript exceeds the length of 8 pages as stated in the Instructions to Authors, which see.
Response: Yes. The revised manuscript pages count is 8 now.

References should be limited to one page with older references cited to Reviews.
Response: Latest references are added and older ones cited to reviews. And they are limited to one page now.
10楼2010-09-15 17:53:51
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 liuyalihd 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见