24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 419  |  回复: 2

phnano

银虫 (小有名气)

[交流] 各位帮忙看看要不要申诉,谢谢

建议欧美人审稿,却偏偏落到韩国人手里,当时就感觉到要悲摧了。编辑只给了一个审稿人的意见。评语算不算空洞,有必要申诉吗?谢谢各位给出中肯的建议!

Dear XX,
Thank you for your recent submission to XX.  We have solicited and received reviewer comments, which can be found below.
Based on this review process, we do not plan to proceed with publication of your manuscript.  Please understand that publication in XX is quite competitive, and we are forced to reject many valuable studies that may go on to be published in other scientific journals.

Reviewers' comments:
Reviewer #1: This manuscript addressed a scalable approach to XX. The authors adopt a conventional XXe process to XX. This method seems an easy and novel process but this reviewer has recognized similar approaches in a number of papers. (据我们所知仅三篇相类似的文章,都引用了,并指出它们的差异)Besides, this manuscript contained many misinterpreted-results, Raman spectroscopy, determination of XX thickness, and etc.(不知道错在哪儿了,还很多?根据原子力测纳米膜厚度也错?) Overall manuscript is lengthy and, especially, the first paragraph showed widely known facts and definition of XX(引言两页半纸,双行间距;强调了一下差异,也是为了更好地与那三篇文章相比较). The author should reduce the length of the manuscript and revised the whole results for publication in other journal. Therefore, this reviewer concluded that this manuscript in present form can not fulfill the standard of this journal.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关商家推荐: (我也要在这里推广)

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
2楼2013-09-23 09:30:37
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

phnano

银虫 (小有名气)

自己顶一下
3楼2013-09-23 14:49:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 phnano 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见