| 查看: 2342 | 回复: 6 | |||
[交流]
第一篇SCI大修修回，焦急等待中，祈福～～～附审稿意见已有4人参与
|
|
2013年4月16号投稿Elsevier旗下if=2.3的期刊，看到该期刊刊登过类似的文章。 with ediitor大概近两个月后under review,8月20号返回审稿意见：副主编给了major revision。 Reviewer #1: Does this paper need editing in the language used (language improvement)? YES __ NO _x_ Please write your report on this submission: 1. Type of Contribution: In this paper the authors reported the research on development of a robust method based×××××. Though ×××××has been researched for a long time, the authors have presented a comprehensive experimental validation to demonstrate the benefits achieved by the proposed approach, leading to a major improvement of a known method, and hence a significant contribution to the research field, in terms of major development of a known application. 2. Potential Impact and overall quality: The overall contribution by the authors in this paper does have a high reference value, though for limited readership, and overall quality of the work done is good, though they have used well known ×××××approaches, the line of investigation is thorough and convincing with extensive experimental validation. 3.Originality and Technical Correctness: Though there is no ground breaking idea, the authors have put together a coherent story backed with evidence in terms of a principled approach and experimental plan, that is technically sound and correct, deserves recognition and warrants publication in this journal. 4. Experimental Evaluation and Clarity of presentation: The experimental evaluation is thorough and convincing and the paper has been written well with clarity of thoughts presented properly. 5. Linguistic quality: The linguistic quality is good, though there seem to be minor typographical errors. A thorough proof reading once may eliminate those errors. 6. Adequacy of references: This is where the paper is a bit weak, as it did not cite some of the important and recent research literature in this area. Including some or all of the following references will ensure that a thorough reference to literature has been done for pursuing this research. Additional References needed: 1.×××××× 2.×××××× 7. Quality of illustrations is excellent and demonstrates some key findings in a convincing manner. I recommend the paper to be accepted subject to revisions with inclusion of additional key references as mentioned above. Reviewer #2: ×××××are combined together for ××××××. Experimental results comparing with only applying ××××××demonstrate the improvement of the proposed scheme. Some points need to be revised so as to improve the readibility. 1. The linguistic quality of this paper need to be improved. 2. One recent paper related to the area of ×××××need to be introduced as following: ××××××× 3. It would be better that the authors may show the running time for extracting ×××××××××. 大约13天后9月3号返回修改稿，现在还是revision submitted to journal. 看到以前该杂志有的修改后返回1天就accept ,3天accept的比较多，在此祈福录用～～～ 奇怪的是投修改稿的时候系统还让推荐审稿人，由于初稿时我没有推荐审稿人，然而修改稿必须要推荐审稿人，很担心会不会再请新的审稿人复审，大家有没有经验啊，谢谢 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
我标书代码变了
已经有64人回复
-
药学硕士找不到工作，打算去做科研助理了
已经有13人回复
-
34岁读博士晚吗
已经有32人回复
-
博后基金刷到的BUG,图片来的更直观
已经有13人回复
-
求教最后一步问题出在哪
已经有4人回复
-
2024国社科通讯评审
已经有25人回复
-
博士毕业高校和就业的相关问题
已经有11人回复
-
F口信息学部拿面上，大概需要什么样的成果
已经有12人回复
-
初始合伙人来啦！（生物试剂耗材标准品）
已经有22人回复
-
ACS Nano投稿后分配到副编辑手里12天了，能确定送审了吗？
已经有11人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- SCI大修，大家帮忙分析一下审稿意见，并散金100希望好运
已经有142人回复
- SSCI大修后再送另一审稿人被拒，请大家帮看一下意见
已经有32人回复
- SCI审稿意见中不问的问题，要回答吗？要修改吗
已经有3人回复
- ACS applied materials & interface 审稿意见回来了
已经有12人回复
- 刚收到SCI期刊的审稿意见，如何回答审稿人？
已经有23人回复
- 第一篇SCI，三个审稿人，一个建议转投其他杂志，另外两个都是大修，请教各位
已经有17人回复
- 求助！！SCI审稿意见回来了，提了很多意见，不太清楚需要后续步骤！
已经有23人回复
- 第一篇SCI论文审稿意见，请各位大神分析。
已经有28人回复
- SCI文章大修,四个审稿人,有一个不同意发表,大修返回后,据的这个审稿人态度会改变吗
已经有15人回复
- 审稿意见全是小修，认真修回后却被拒了。这是啥情况？
已经有47人回复
- SCI文章状态变为小修，但是收到的邮件里却没有小修意见，何解？
已经有29人回复
- SCI修回稿track change怎么用？
已经有18人回复
- 文章大修，个人不同意审稿人意见
已经有11人回复
- 投SCI外刊，如何回复审稿意见，谢谢！！！
已经有6人回复
- SCI审稿意见回来了，编辑给的moderate revision，麻烦大家帮分析一下，有BB
已经有28人回复
- SCI一审大修，但是让补的实验没有意义，咋办呢？解释给审稿人听？
已经有11人回复
- 我的第一SCI投稿返回意见了，这个算大修还是小修？ Physica A
已经有11人回复
- 大修修回under review 一个月了，心里开始担心
已经有77人回复
- 文章大修后一般几天修回？
已经有18人回复
- 大修中的大修，三个审稿人，五十条审稿意见
已经有150人回复
- 第一篇SCI接受的曲折过程：2次大修+1次小修+4次送审。
已经有223人回复
- 第一篇SCI审稿意见回来，郁闷了，散点金币，求安慰
已经有304人回复
- sci 文章小修修回后，还会被送审吗？
已经有29人回复
- 投SCI大修，审稿人2个同意一个拒稿
已经有18人回复
- 第一篇SCI审稿意见回来了（大修）
已经有66人回复
2楼2013-09-05 10:02:28
3楼2013-09-05 10:30:43
4楼2013-09-08 09:42:43
Supermaster
新虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 112 (高中生)
- 金币: 3592.1
- 散金: 836
- 红花: 9
- 帖子: 551
- 在线: 283.5小时
- 虫号: 2049759
- 注册: 2012-10-08
- 专业: 电力系统
5楼2013-09-08 11:54:01
olz1981
捐助贵宾 (著名写手)
漂亮的飘零
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 340.2
- 帖子: 2974
- 在线: 235.2小时
- 虫号: 3314337
- 注册: 2014-07-09
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 电力系统
6楼2014-07-15 22:13:36
7楼2014-10-24 20:13:08
20