24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 2057  |  回复: 10
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

carlxiong

金虫 (小有名气)

[交流] (已接收)决然不同的审稿意见,会有什么结果!已有9人参与

以下审稿意见差别比较大,编辑给大修,本人三天修回!还会送给第二审稿人么?或者再送别的审稿人?第二审稿人没有更具体意见,是不是找事的呀!
Reviewer #1: xxxxx is a potential method for the fabrication of xxxxxx. In terms of this experiment and related analysis, some results in this paper are of interest to the scientific community in the related fields. I appreciate the progress and effort that the authors have made. Therefore, I recommend to you that this manuscript can be accepted with minor revision.
Detailed comments are as follow:
1.xxxxx
2.xxxxx
3.xxxxxx

Reviewer #2: In general, the manuscript was not well organized and was not written in good order. More importantly, there was no a systematic discussion on the main results of the study. Generally, only the results were given. Therefore, the manuscript is not suitable for publication in the journal in present state.

[ Last edited by carlxiong on 2013-8-24 at 23:09 ]
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
6楼2013-08-12 10:46:48
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 carlxiong 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见