| 查看: 4274 | 回复: 14 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
wxldreamfly银虫 (初入文坛)
|
[求助]
Optics Letter 返回审稿意见，请大家支招，如何处理？多谢！
|
||
|
小弟投稿OL, 返回的审稿意见大多属于小修的写法问题，只有少量需要解释的东西，而且不难解释，根据审稿人意见如果按要求修改审稿人是好似倾向于中的，但是主编的决定是拒稿，请大家帮忙支招，这种情况是修改重投还是申请仲裁呢，以下是审稿意见： Manuscript ID: xxxxxxx Type: Regular Title: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Dear Sir/Madam: A decision has been made on the above manuscript. As a co-author, I thought you'd be interested in seeing the referee comments. In view of their recommendations, I cannot accept the manuscript for publication in Optics Letters. If there are no reviewer comments below, please contact the corresponding author to view them. Sincerely, xxxxxxxxxx Topical Editor, Optics Letters --------------------------- Reviewer comments are provided here: Reviewer 1 The paper presents a study of light tunneling through a metamaterial around the negative-zero-positive frequency, tracing parallels to similar effects and results obtained in electron transport in graphene. The lateral shift is shown to vary from positive to negative values depending on which side of the Dirac Point the simulations is performed. Results for tunneling time and velocity are also presented. My recommendation is that this work should be accepted with a few changes pointed below. 1 - Missing reference at "It has been shownthat,when ωep=ωmp=ωD and γ=0 (noloss), the dispersion of the NZPIM satisfies a linear equation k2(ω)=(ω−ωD)/υD." 2 - In the text where fig 2a and b are explained, the authors referred to "the saturation value" when they seem to mean the magnitude (abs) of this value. 3 - The numerical values for some parameters could not be found in the paper, making it impossible to reproduce, in special ωD and γ. 4 -Ref. 16 is wrong; the correct volume for this publication is 65, not 4. Please check other references carefully. 5 - The authors seem to use γ=0, but that is not explicit in the paper. If that is the case, it's important to discuss the effects of a larger γ, specially since all current metamaterial implementations show significant losses. How would those impact the results in an experimental setup? Reviewer 2 The authors discussed the interesting Goos-Hanchen shift and Hartman effect in negative-zero-positive index materials (NZPIMs). I really approciate the selection of this topic while there are quite some questions to be answered in the current manuscript and quite some corrections are needed. 1. One interesting property of a NZPIM is the refractive index can be negative, positive and ZERO. The authors discussed the properties at frequencies with either negative and positive material while left zero-index material intact; 2. The hartman effect in NZPIM is to be discovered and I am expecting to obtain some physical explanation of the saturation time/length, for instance the magnitude or the origin. While I don't see any explanation but only numerical observations; 3. The dramatic change of tunneling time when barrier thickness is an interesting observation. It can vary from negative to positive. The author need to present more results (at least more incident angles) before a conclusion is drawn due to "linear dispersion of NZPIM" though I can barely follow the logic; 4. Figure 2 is poorly organized. symbols are missing in legend. Given the extra space left, my advice is to seperate Figure 2; 5. I guess, wD, an important parameter is set at 10GHz while it never appear anywhere in the main text; 6. Equ (1) and (2) are for e2 and u2 instead of e1 and u1. Equ (8) is unreadable. Even a typo at address. Unfortunatly, I cannot recommend the publication of this manuscript based on current quality. [ Last edited by avast2009 on 2013-6-19 at 21:12 ] |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 论文投稿交流的收集 |
» 猜你喜欢
289材料与化工（085600）B区求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
一志愿武理材料工程348求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
08工科 320总分 求调剂
已经有11人回复
-
一志愿华中农业071010，总分320求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
323求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
284求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
317求调剂
已经有16人回复
-
287求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
308求调剂
已经有3人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- Physical review E审稿结束7天了，编辑还没有返回审稿意见，是不是凶多吉少啊
已经有9人回复
- Optics Letters返回两个审稿意见，一个不用修改直接接收，一个大改，编辑让重投。。
已经有23人回复
- Optics Letters投稿一周收到编辑回信怎么只有一个审稿人的意见
已经有7人回复
- 关于optics and laser technology 审稿意见的问题
已经有13人回复
- 关于optics letter的 Peer review status
已经有6人回复
- 投Applied Optics 被拒， 可以改投Optics Express 吗？
已经有36人回复
- Optics letter 一审accept with mandatory revisions 投修改稿有没有被拒的？
已经有12人回复
- OE（optics express）这样的审稿意见还有改的必要吗？
已经有23人回复
- 投Applied Optics返回审稿意见，恳请各位看看给点意见
已经有11人回复
- 大家讨论一下 审稿人 几天就返回审稿意见 该意见是好还是坏？？
已经有8人回复
- 如何回复Optics express （OE）审稿邀请
已经有6人回复
- 第一次发APPLIED OPTICS ， 关于图像处理的。现在把审稿进程给大家公布一下。
已经有11人回复
- 请教Appliced optics 修改意见中为什么只看到一个审稿人的意见？
已经有9人回复
- 【求助】有劳虫友高手帮忙看看acs审稿意见，多谢！
已经有5人回复
- Optics Letter 文章 投稿
已经有2人回复
- Optics Communications小修,审稿意见怎么回答,请指教~
已经有4人回复
- 投Optics Communications给大修，录用几率如何？
已经有6人回复
- 请教Applied optics的Manuscript Accepted with Mandatory Revisions是个什么状态？
已经有15人回复
- 【LaTeX模板求助】求助Optics & Laser Technology投稿模板的使用问题（Elsevier）
已经有21人回复
- optics letters投稿给些意见
已经有5人回复
- 关于optics letters的审稿意见的紧急咨询(很着急)
已经有3人回复
- Optics Letters投稿时候需要Cover Letter像APL那样
已经有11人回复
- optics letter 投稿问题
已经有5人回复
- OE审稿到几时？
已经有17人回复
伤哒心
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 853 (博后)
- 金币: 37460.8
- 红花: 32
- 帖子: 8959
- 在线: 972.9小时
- 虫号: 1333010
- 注册: 2011-06-28
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 集成电路设计与测试
6楼2013-06-17 09:26:17
unclee
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 3 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 4100.3
- 散金: 676
- 帖子: 384
- 在线: 427.9小时
- 虫号: 695925
- 注册: 2009-02-03
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 光子与光电子器件
2楼2013-06-16 21:28:49
xautldhldh
木虫之王 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 102 (高中生)
- 金币: 55442.4
- 散金: 960
- 红花: 20
- 帖子: 47584
- 在线: 1537.5小时
- 虫号: 2450434
- 注册: 2013-05-06
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 光学信息获取与处理
3楼2013-06-17 00:12:12
★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
wxldreamfly: 金币+1 2013-06-18 06:14:14
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
wxldreamfly: 金币+1 2013-06-18 06:14:14
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
4楼2013-06-17 01:00:42
40