24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 5547  |  回复: 8
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者figoyun将赠送您 25 个金币

figoyun

银虫 (小有名气)

[求助] Nature Communications 被拒,申诉还有机会么?

应用物理方面的研究,4月19号投了NC,25号通知送审,昨天收到编辑的据信。
据的原因是文章是基于组内2012年初的一篇理论仿真文章,创新性不足,这点两个审稿人都提到了。但是这篇文章有部分理论还是很新的,同时实验做得也很完美,效果什么的是目前最好的。不知道这样申诉的成果率有多少?


Your manuscript entitled "******" has now been seen by 2 referees, whose comments are appended below. In the light of their advice I regret to inform you that we cannot publish your manuscript in Nature Communications.

You will see that, while Reviewer #1 in particular finds your work of some interest, both referees nonetheless raise substantive concerns that cast doubt on the advance your findings represent over earlier work and the strength of the novel conclusions that can be drawn at this stage. In particular, they both discuss the degree to which this work advances our understanding compared earlier work, including ref. 33. Unfortunately, these reservations are sufficiently important to preclude publication of this study in Nature Communications.

We appreciate that, with further work, it may be possible for you to address the technical concerns these referees raise (indeed, I have little doubt that you could), and that nothing in what they have said need necessarily prevent the publication of this work in some forum. However, I am afraid that none of their comments allows us to conclude that it provides the sort of significant conceptual advance in general understanding that would be likely to command the attention of our diverse readership. We therefore feel that it would find a more appropriate outlet in a more specialist journal, rather than Nature Communications.

I know that this decision will disappoint you, especially in view of the positive recommendations of Reviewer #1, but I should explain that we do not ask referees to say whether or not they think that a paper belongs in Nature Communications (the determination of which is a solely editorial prerogative). Instead, we ask them to tell us specifically what they feel to be the paper's contribution, and what its significance might be, and based on these comments and our own editorial criteria we decide whether publication in Nature Communications is appropriate. In this regard, although Reviewer #2 discusses the suitability of your manuscript for Nature, we feel that their editorial comments in this case apply equally to Nature Communications.

I am sorry that we cannot be more positive on this occasion and thank you for the opportunity to consider your work.
回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘贴专辑推荐

Nature Communication

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sally208

专家顾问 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
figoyun: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助 2013-05-18 14:59:47
猪会飞: 金币+4, 鼓励交流 2013-05-18 17:06:15
zhenghaiw: 金币+1, 有道理! 2013-05-18 23:42:47
编辑已经详细的解释了该稿件不适合Nat Comm的原因了,最主要就是新颖性不够,属于硬伤。这种情况再申诉不太现实,建议直接转投它刊。
2楼2013-05-18 14:45:57
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

figoyun

银虫 (小有名气)


zhenghaiw: 金币+1, 鼓励参与! 2013-05-18 23:43:02
引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by sally208 at 2013-05-18 14:45:57
编辑已经详细的解释了该稿件不适合Nat Comm的原因了,最主要就是新颖性不够,属于硬伤。这种情况再申诉不太现实,建议直接转投它刊。

文章中将新颖性写得也不是太突出,导致审稿人没有完全文章的新颖性,尤其是第二个审稿人,好多问题都是为了据稿而写的。所以想根据审稿人的意见修改,然后重点突出新颖性和有点,然后申诉下。
比较好的实验结果,不想放弃这个机会啊。
3楼2013-05-18 15:03:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nanofollower

专家顾问 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by figoyun at 2013-05-18 15:03:24
文章中将新颖性写得也不是太突出,导致审稿人没有完全文章的新颖性,尤其是第二个审稿人,好多问题都是为了据稿而写的。所以想根据审稿人的意见修改,然后重点突出新颖性和有点,然后申诉下。
比较好的实验结果, ...

比较难,现在NC要求挺高的,一正一负的意见估计申诉都没有希望,你两个都是负的,基本不可能了
4楼2013-05-18 15:17:28
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

电子科大生物

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)

博士后

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
楼主,赶紧改投,别得瑟了!
我走的很慢,但我从不后退
5楼2013-05-18 17:07:38
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhenwuhuang

至尊木虫 (文学泰斗)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
编辑说的很明确,创新性不够呀。除非调整进去原创性内容,再投也难。
6楼2013-05-18 17:29:22
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

goslar

木虫 (职业作家)

我不再应助!

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
难, 改投 choose another journal
无故被警告,非常失望,我不再应助!
7楼2013-05-18 22:44:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

doxxod

木虫 (正式写手)

不试试怎么知道呢,如果文章不是很着急发表,申诉一下有什么关系?
8楼2013-10-28 15:06:58
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Odyssey1989

铁虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

这种情况申诉很难了。。

虽然审稿人的评价貌似中立甚至肯定,但编辑不太认可,说缺乏概念性的突破。。而且还很明确地指出审稿人不得决定文章是否发表。。这就很明白了。。意思是编辑想拒,审稿人没有丝毫决定权
Let's rock science!
9楼2013-10-28 16:27:09
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 figoyun 的主题更新
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] F口信息学部拿面上,大概需要什么样的成果 +7 _奋黎_ 2024-06-16 12/600 2024-06-18 07:41 by ld_cauchy
[基金申请] 博后基金刷到的BUG,图片来的更直观 +10 carolloo 2024-06-17 11/550 2024-06-18 06:55 by byanmyt
[找工作] 初始合伙人来啦!(生物试剂耗材标准品) +12 欢快的小科研人 2024-06-15 22/1100 2024-06-18 06:50 by swq120
[文学芳草园] 累并快乐着 +15 MYHLD521 2024-06-14 15/750 2024-06-18 01:28 by liyeqik
[考博] 2025考博 +7 自强不息a?a 2024-06-15 12/600 2024-06-17 22:51 by 自强不息a?a
[找工作] 杭电、天津科技、青农和宁波工程学院如何选? +12 味道很好啊 2024-06-13 23/1150 2024-06-17 22:16 by 半简体
[公派出国] 去英国的小伙伴儿都在哪儿租的房子呀? +5 65syn 2024-06-14 8/400 2024-06-17 19:57 by 爱吃菜的虫
[高分子] 寻找聚酯反应釜 +3 茕茕恭煮 2024-06-15 4/200 2024-06-17 18:18 by sunliyan123
[基金申请] 博后面上今天有bug可以看到是否资助? +22 lyfbangong 2024-06-12 33/1650 2024-06-17 16:17 by carolloo
[基金申请] 博后基金,博管会会提前知道消息吗? +4 yuyiang 2024-06-13 4/200 2024-06-16 11:40 by yangyuzhong4
[论文投稿] 投了一篇4区的SCI,审稿人一个拒稿,一个小修,编辑给了大修。 +9 安稳22123 2024-06-13 10/500 2024-06-14 23:45 by jurkat.1640
[考研] 物理化学一对一辅导 +3 林大diao 2024-06-12 5/250 2024-06-14 20:57 by 林大diao
[基金申请] 工材E口JQ有消息了吗 +4 babyduck 2024-06-11 4/200 2024-06-14 17:23 by firepick
[有机交流] ππ堆积会发生在有机溶剂中吗 5+3 zibuyu0420 2024-06-13 4/200 2024-06-14 14:17 by 小肉干
[基金申请] 国自然基金公布的时候基金号有吗 +8 潇洒怡惜 2024-06-13 11/550 2024-06-14 11:24 by JRfei
[基金申请] 工材E10口函评结束了吗 10+3 我1的飞翔 2024-06-13 5/250 2024-06-14 06:35 by nono2009
[基金申请] 博士后面上项目状态还是专家评审吗 10+9 Thatcheremu 2024-06-13 55/2750 2024-06-13 21:23 by 乌合麒麟
[考博] 博导选择 +3 bing85977 2024-06-12 3/150 2024-06-13 15:34 by 我是邱尧
[论文投稿] with editor日期变更 +3 慎独的小花卷 2024-06-12 8/400 2024-06-13 11:00 by 慎独的小花卷
[基金申请] 博后特助这周出结果吗?往年都是啥时候啊? +13 jsqy 2024-06-12 17/850 2024-06-12 19:55 by Lynn212
信息提示
请填处理意见