| 查看: 5550 | 回复: 8 | |||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者figoyun将赠送您 25 个金币 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[求助]
Nature Communications 被拒，申诉还有机会么？
|
|||
|
应用物理方面的研究，4月19号投了NC，25号通知送审，昨天收到编辑的据信。 据的原因是文章是基于组内2012年初的一篇理论仿真文章，创新性不足，这点两个审稿人都提到了。但是这篇文章有部分理论还是很新的，同时实验做得也很完美，效果什么的是目前最好的。不知道这样申诉的成果率有多少？ Your manuscript entitled "******" has now been seen by 2 referees, whose comments are appended below. In the light of their advice I regret to inform you that we cannot publish your manuscript in Nature Communications. You will see that, while Reviewer #1 in particular finds your work of some interest, both referees nonetheless raise substantive concerns that cast doubt on the advance your findings represent over earlier work and the strength of the novel conclusions that can be drawn at this stage. In particular, they both discuss the degree to which this work advances our understanding compared earlier work, including ref. 33. Unfortunately, these reservations are sufficiently important to preclude publication of this study in Nature Communications. We appreciate that, with further work, it may be possible for you to address the technical concerns these referees raise (indeed, I have little doubt that you could), and that nothing in what they have said need necessarily prevent the publication of this work in some forum. However, I am afraid that none of their comments allows us to conclude that it provides the sort of significant conceptual advance in general understanding that would be likely to command the attention of our diverse readership. We therefore feel that it would find a more appropriate outlet in a more specialist journal, rather than Nature Communications. I know that this decision will disappoint you, especially in view of the positive recommendations of Reviewer #1, but I should explain that we do not ask referees to say whether or not they think that a paper belongs in Nature Communications (the determination of which is a solely editorial prerogative). Instead, we ask them to tell us specifically what they feel to be the paper's contribution, and what its significance might be, and based on these comments and our own editorial criteria we decide whether publication in Nature Communications is appropriate. In this regard, although Reviewer #2 discusses the suitability of your manuscript for Nature, we feel that their editorial comments in this case apply equally to Nature Communications. I am sorry that we cannot be more positive on this occasion and thank you for the opportunity to consider your work. |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘贴专辑推荐
 Nature Communication |
» 猜你喜欢
第一篇论文投稿进程记录
已经有11人回复
-
博后网上办公系统维护
已经有22人回复
-
暑假孩子一个人在家可以干什么
已经有7人回复
-
专科院校申请国自然
已经有21人回复
-
offer选择
已经有3人回复
-
夏至，要不要硕博联谊
已经有8人回复
-
基金评审时，评审专家还回去看申请人代表作之外的文章吗？
已经有12人回复
-
CSC博士联培对将来就业有用吗
已经有5人回复
-
对象没有，还非常想读博，难以抉择
已经有52人回复
-
自然基金变化？？
已经有25人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 最新Nature Communications-超越电容器的锂电池
已经有299人回复
- Nature Communications投稿经验
已经有26人回复
- 大化所Nature Communications：半导体不同晶面之间可以实现光生电子和空穴的空间分离
已经有167人回复
- 有没有投Nature communications的虫友啊
已经有32人回复
- Nature Communications上公布无机材料光学活性的一种发生新机制
已经有6人回复
- 大家觉得投稿Nature Communications和Angew. Chem.-Int. Edit.哪个更好？
已经有7人回复
- JACS,advanced materials和nature communications 比较
已经有29人回复
- 请问nature communications送审会发邮件通知么？
已经有15人回复
- Nature Communications最新报道：宽温域磁-结构耦合相变材料获得重要进展
已经有6人回复
- nature communications 影响因子
已经有3人回复
- 关于"nature communications"
已经有9人回复
- Nature communications 是个什么杂志？
已经有7人回复
- nature materials悲剧了，可以申诉吗？
已经有23人回复
nanofollower
专家顾问 (著名写手)
-
专家经验: +108 - 应助: 411 (硕士)
- 贵宾: 0.005
- 金币: 5255
- 红花: 28
- 帖子: 1174
- 在线: 353小时
- 虫号: 2130741
- 注册: 2012-11-16
- 专业: 无机纳米化学
- 管辖: 微米和纳米
4楼2013-05-18 15:17:28
sally208
专家顾问 (著名写手)
-
专家经验: +19 - SEPI: 1
- 应助: 443 (硕士)
- 贵宾: 0.809
- 金币: 7054.4
- 散金: 6125
- 红花: 123
- 帖子: 2290
- 在线: 412.1小时
- 虫号: 514807
- 注册: 2008-02-29
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 光谱分析
- 管辖: 微米和纳米
2楼2013-05-18 14:45:57
3楼2013-05-18 15:03:24
电子科大生物
铁杆木虫 (职业作家)
博士后
- 应助: 291 (大学生)
- 金币: 8359.8
- 散金: 2472
- 红花: 39
- 帖子: 3211
- 在线: 1886.1小时
- 虫号: 913675
- 注册: 2009-11-26
- 专业: 医用生物材料与植入科学
楼主，赶紧改投，别得瑟了！
5楼2013-05-18 17:07:38
10