应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 求助完结 » 谁投过Modern Optics？
41/1返回列表
查看: 898  |  回复: 3
只看楼主 @他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看

asqin1945

木虫 (正式写手)

[求助] 谁投过Modern Optics？

帮忙看下这种审稿意见要怎么改啊，谢谢！
貌似都是很笼统的，没有一条一条的具体意见怎么改啊？


Reviewer: 1

Recommendation: Major Revision

Comments:
(There are no comments.)

Additional Questions:
Significance: Yes, the scheme illustrated does not require sophiscated set up and can be a robust production method.

Scientific Validity: The discussion seems clear and straightforward based on basic physics.

Scientific Contribution: In this referee's opinion, in current form this manuscript needs the results of more studies included. Even so, it does have the merit of showing a new way of making blazed gratings, and other researcher may be interested to investigate and make improvement based on these initial findings.

Overall Presentation: The writing is clear and acceptable.


Reviewer: 2

Recommendation: Accept

Comments:
No

Additional Questions:
Significance: Yes, a novel method to fabricate echelle grating through multiple beam interference is proposed and experimentally validated in this paper. Such grating is usually fabricated through mechanical rulling method.

Scientific Validity: Yes, the science is sound and well reasoned.

Scientific Contribution: This paper provide a new way of making echelle grating through multi-beam interence method, which is more efficient and energy saving, this technique can be further developed to make perfect echelle gratings, it will attract the attention of researchers and companies that involve in grating fabrication.

Overall Presentation: Yes, it is written in a clear and succint academic style, further polish of this paper by a linguist will make it better. The title is descriptive. The abstract clearly summarize the manuscript. The introduction provide a good rationale justifying the aim and significance of the research. There is no paragraph or sentence that is unclear/ambiguous in this manuscript.

[ Last edited by cxksama on 2013-7-13 at 15:37 ]
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
1楼 2013-04-19 17:56:55
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jin151

木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
asqin1945: 金币+2, ★有帮助 2013-04-23 08:43:54
把他的每一句话能回答的都列出来详细回答，他虽然不是逐条的，但你可以逐条来解释。
PS：楼主是不是投的journal of modern optics？请问一审审了多久啊？
赞一下 回复此楼
2楼2013-04-19 20:02:16
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

asqin1945

木虫 (正式写手)
引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by jin151 at 2013-04-19 20:02:16
把他的每一句话能回答的都列出来详细回答，他虽然不是逐条的，但你可以逐条来解释。
PS：楼主是不是投的journal of modern optics？请问一审审了多久啊？

一个月
回复此楼
3楼2013-04-19 21:05:43
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

asqin1945

木虫 (正式写手)
没人理我
回复此楼
4楼2013-05-01 23:38:42
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 asqin1945 的主题更新
41/1返回列表
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭