| 查看: 878 | 回复: 3 | ||
[求助]
谁投过Modern Optics？
|
|
帮忙看下这种审稿意见要怎么改啊，谢谢！ 貌似都是很笼统的，没有一条一条的具体意见怎么改啊？ Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: Major Revision Comments: (There are no comments.) Additional Questions: Significance: Yes, the scheme illustrated does not require sophiscated set up and can be a robust production method. Scientific Validity: The discussion seems clear and straightforward based on basic physics. Scientific Contribution: In this referee's opinion, in current form this manuscript needs the results of more studies included. Even so, it does have the merit of showing a new way of making blazed gratings, and other researcher may be interested to investigate and make improvement based on these initial findings. Overall Presentation: The writing is clear and acceptable. Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: Accept Comments: No Additional Questions: Significance: Yes, a novel method to fabricate echelle grating through multiple beam interference is proposed and experimentally validated in this paper. Such grating is usually fabricated through mechanical rulling method. Scientific Validity: Yes, the science is sound and well reasoned. Scientific Contribution: This paper provide a new way of making echelle grating through multi-beam interence method, which is more efficient and energy saving, this technique can be further developed to make perfect echelle gratings, it will attract the attention of researchers and companies that involve in grating fabrication. Overall Presentation: Yes, it is written in a clear and succint academic style, further polish of this paper by a linguist will make it better. The title is descriptive. The abstract clearly summarize the manuscript. The introduction provide a good rationale justifying the aim and significance of the research. There is no paragraph or sentence that is unclear/ambiguous in this manuscript. [ Last edited by cxksama on 2013-7-13 at 15:37 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
让我中一个面上吧！
已经有8人回复
-
科研孤儿太难了
已经有13人回复
-
言之凿凿，明天官网会通知放榜？
已经有17人回复
-
时间戳又变了
已经有17人回复
-
今天系统多次维护，明天很可能放榜！
已经有11人回复
-
时间戳变了，能看出什么问题？
已经有23人回复
-
只有每年这种时候来逛逛小木虫
已经有22人回复
-
放榜前的不淡定
已经有12人回复
-
重要消息，中午系统在维护
已经有12人回复
-
今天基金会出结果吗？20260819
已经有15人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- optics letters被拒，改投optics express可以吗？要注意些什么呢？
已经有10人回复
- 投Optics Letters 编辑给了mandatory revisions，希望大么？
已经有9人回复
- 投Applied Optics 被拒， 可以改投Optics Express 吗？
已经有36人回复
- optics express 投稿
已经有4人回复
- 求助 optics express 发票问题
已经有7人回复
- Optics Express接收！散金！付投稿全过程+一段小插曲
已经有116人回复
- 投Applied Optics返回审稿意见，恳请各位看看给点意见
已经有11人回复
- optics communications投稿疑问！望牛人指点
已经有6人回复
- 有誰知道這個二�?要多久嗎? OPTICS AND LASER TECHNOLOGY
已经有12人回复
- optics express编辑让修改文章中的一个公式
已经有4人回复
- optics communications投稿
已经有27人回复
- optics communications投稿状态咨询！
已经有11人回复
- 关于投往Applied Optics期刊中通信作者的问题
已经有8人回复
- optics communications 提交审稿时图片和表的位置
已经有11人回复
- optics communications 这个期刊是SCI吗
已经有5人回复
- applied optics 投稿求助
已经有14人回复
- optics letters编辑发错邮件了？
已经有3人回复
- optics letters投稿给些意见
已经有5人回复
- 谁经历过Applied Optics审稿过程中的Other？
已经有7人回复
- Journal of Modern Optics审稿三月,没给审就给锯了
已经有3人回复
- Optics Letters投稿时候需要Cover Letter像APL那样
已经有11人回复
- optics letter 投稿问题
已经有5人回复
- Journal of Modern Optics:under review两月了
已经有5人回复
jin151
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 33 (小学生)
- 金币: 5063.6
- 散金: 1675
- 红花: 11
- 帖子: 2685
- 在线: 692.7小时
- 虫号: 839539
- 注册: 2009-09-03
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 光学
2楼2013-04-19 20:02:16
3楼2013-04-19 21:05:43
4楼2013-05-01 23:38:42
40