24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 366  |  回复: 2

wmjjmw01

新虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 求助各位大虾

Ref.:  Ms. No. IJHM-D-13-00110R1
Predictive Factors associated with Long-Term Effects of Laparoscopic Splenectomy for Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia

Dear Dr Peng,

I am pleased to inform you that with certain revisions to your manuscript, your work may be reconsidered for publication. The reviewers' advice on the necessary revisions and their comments are appended below.

If you are willing to undertake the required amendments, please submit a point by point response listing your changes or justifications to the reviewers' comments when you submit the revised manuscript. In the text, all corrections should be indicated in red.

Your revision is due by 06/29/2013 (mm/dd/yyyy).

To submit a revision, go to http://ijhm.edmgr.com/ and log in as an Author. Click on the menu item [Submission Needing Revision] to find your submission record and upload revised files.
Please note that manuscripts for which we do not receive a response for 30 days past their revision due date may be deleted from the Editorial Manager system.

Yours sincerely,

Toshio Kitamura
Editor-in-Chief
International Journal of Hematology

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: The authors answered to our comments properly.  

However, I still concern the following issue.
I understood that the 10 patients reported in the previous report (ref 11, Int J Hematol 94:533-538) are overlapped with the patients in the current report.  
If so, I think that the authors should refer to the duplication of the 10 patients in their manuscript.


Reviewer #2: The Authors precisely responded to all issues on your MS, then thought it was valuable enough to be published in IJH.



求助大家审稿1的问题是什么意思
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zypl781102

木虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
呵呵,问题不大嘛,意思式你的response基本可以,但还有一个问题需要作者澄清---审稿人认为参考文献11中10个病人与你的文章纳入患者有重复之嫌,也就是部分病人是一样的甚至完全同一批患者,如果有重复,你要在修改稿中注明患者来源情况,没有重复最好也说一下,免得误会,小问题,接受没问题的,祝贺
2楼2013-04-01 16:31:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wmjjmw01

新虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by zypl781102 at 2013-04-01 16:31:56
呵呵,问题不大嘛,意思式你的response基本可以,但还有一个问题需要作者澄清---审稿人认为参考文献11中10个病人与你的文章纳入患者有重复之嫌,也就是部分病人是一样的甚至完全同一批患者,如果有重复,你要在修改 ...

谢谢,,,,,十分感谢了,,准备明天投出去
3楼2013-04-01 16:36:44
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 wmjjmw01 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见