| 查看: 7695 | 回复: 23 | ||||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||||
zhangjishi金虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
刚收到SCI期刊的审稿意见，如何回答审稿人？
|
|||
|
第一篇SCi投稿，今天刚刚收到审稿意见。共有3个审稿人。前2个的问题基本都是些小问题，但是第三个审稿的意见本人觉得不好解决，有拒稿的意思。请各位大侠指点。以下是第三个审稿人的意见： Reviewer: 3 >Comments to the Author >The ideas in the paper are interesting and the theoretic results obtained have some potential in applications. However, the paper is poorly written and the organization needs a big improvement, although the results are globally technically correct. Therefore, this reviewer does not recomend its acceptance as a full paper at this stage. > >1. The motivation of wide practical use of the theoretic results presented should be clearly emphasized. At this stage, it is not quite clear to the reviewer. > >2. As similar problem in the paper has been studied by others in the past, so the unique features of the approaches proposed and the main advantages of the results over others have to be clearly commented and shown. > >3. The example used to demonstrate the main results need to be improved. More remarks should be given to the figures to clearly demonstrate the effectiveness of the obtained results. > >4. The paper also has some typos and language issue which needs to be checked and corrected in the revision. > >5. It seems that all the techniques used to solve the problems have been proposed in literature. What are the difficultis when dealing with these problems. The authors fail to illustrate this point clearly. Considering this, this reviewer thinks that the paper better be shortened and reorganized as a brief paper. |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 SCI写作经验交流 | 英文论文投稿 |
» 猜你喜欢
2025年遐想
已经有3人回复
-
自荐读博
已经有9人回复
-
投稿Elsevier的杂志（返修），总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球
已经有8人回复
-
自然科学基金委宣布启动申请书“瘦身提质”行动
已经有4人回复
-
求个博导看看
已经有18人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 审稿意见看不懂，专家英文不地道
已经有12人回复
- 第一次投SCI，苦苦等了3个月，结果是大修，面对审稿人意见不知如何是好
已经有10人回复
- [求助] sci论文revise, 其中一个拒稿的审稿人意见该如何回复？
已经有14人回复
- 某SCI杂志邀我做审稿人，要不要审稿？
已经有46人回复
- 第一次发sci期刊，请帮忙看下评审意见
已经有20人回复
- 投国外SCI期刊，关于推进审稿人
已经有23人回复
- sci期刊让推荐审稿人，这个有什么技巧吗？
已经有41人回复
- SCI审稿人不审稿，给出不匹配审稿意（研究内容与他冲突）
已经有29人回复
- 投稿SCI期刊（小修），编辑给的意见，有经验的虫友们给出出主意啊！
已经有15人回复
- 初投SCI，如何推荐合适的审稿人？
已经有7人回复
- SCI期刊会采用我推荐的审稿人吗？
已经有13人回复
- 刚收到SCI期刊的审稿意见，看不懂，高手帮忙看一下~~
已经有8人回复
- SCI投稿审稿人意见是这样的怎么回复？
已经有9人回复
- 硕士刚毕业能当SCI审稿人吗？
已经有21人回复
- 硕士能当SCI审稿人吗？
已经有9人回复
- SCI文章审稿人意见回来，却不知如何答复，请各位前辈指点
已经有7人回复
peterflyer 
木虫之王 (文学泰斗)
peterflyer
- 应助: 20282 (院士)
- 金币: 145896
- 红花: 1374
- 帖子: 93090
- 在线: 7694.1小时
- 虫号: 1482829
- 注册: 2011-11-08
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 功能陶瓷
23楼2013-09-03 19:32:35