24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

zhanga

金虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 613.3
帖子: 78
在线: 51.3小时
虫号: 703645

[交流] 文章审稿意见回来了，交流经验散金币，同时期待指点指点怎样写回信

第一次投稿，elsevier的。上个月（nov 06）投的稿子，上周（DEC 13）得到消息：revision；一个月的期限。decision letter如下，请有经验的朋友指点一番。
Dear Dr. ,
We are pleased to inform you that your paper has been reviewed. We have considered all our referees' comments concerning your manuscript and have concluded that revision of the manuscript is required prior to publication.
We will consider your paper withdrawn from our journal automatically if we do not hear from you on Jan 12, 2013.
We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Thanks for your understanding and co-operation in advance.
另外，编辑找了三个审稿人给出了意见：分歧较大。
reviewer #1没有给出具体的点评，只是说文章介绍了一种比较复杂的分析方法，灵敏度检出限都不如其他仪器分析方法，看不出新意，所以 I cann't recommend it.看到这
，心凉半截，悲剧了莫非。继续往下看。。。谢谢大家关心，我把第一位审稿人原话贴出来吧，可以更好地理解审稿人的意思：
Reviewer #1: The work reported a very complex analytical method for Hg2+ detection, However, its sensitivity and selectivity is obviously lower than present methods such as AAS and ICP-MS. Moreover, many biosensors based on DNA hybridization have well been reported in literatures. Present study lacks of enough novelty to publish on the journal. Therefore, I cann't recommend it.
Reviewer #2 说文章设计的东西interesting，文章草稿也well-written。One minor question need to be further address.。。。。然后审稿人耐心地提出了自己的一个新观点，问这个观点是否成立。If the answer is OK, then it may have broad application in detection other biomaterials.
Reviewer #3先介绍了文章梗概，直接亮出观点 The manuscript is suitable for publication in the journal with minor revision. 然后耐心提出了一下很具体的需要改的地方。。。
读到这，踏实了一点，等到一个多月，总算有了一个评价。

现在，我想请教各位牛人，我该怎样更好地revision。尤其是第一个审稿人，他的观点就是文章没新意，但是，我自己觉得我已经把文章的新意突出出来了，而且不能说一点新意没有。大家觉得该怎样措辞回复第一个审稿人才好。
1个negative&2个positive 编辑的决定一般会怎样。
谢谢各位了

另外，审稿期间，还有个小插曲. under review 了一个月，Dec 05 状态改成了，required reviews completed，本来以为不出3天就有decision，可是required reviews completed持续到了dec 13. 难道这个和审稿意见分歧有关

[ Last edited by zhanga on 2012-12-17 at 13:17 ]

回复此楼