[交流] 这种情况请教

大家好，我投了一篇CC关于吸附的，审稿一个多月后返回审稿意见，两个审稿人一个说新颖性不够，拓扑一个地方写错了，然后一句not of sufficient interest or novelty for Chem. Commun；第二个审稿人说文章 presented seem exciting and probably deserves publication in ChemCommun, the authors’ interpretation of the data, especially regarding the gas adsorption results, is particularly questionable (see comments below for details). I therefore recommend acceptance of the manuscript after major revision，给了3个修改意见。
最后编辑的信是：Firstly I must apologise for the length of time required for the peer review of this manuscript, which is much longer than is usual for ChemComm. Unfortunately a referee failed to provide a report in the recommended timeframe, and an alternative referee was consulted. Thank you for your submission to ChemComm. I have now received the reviewers’ reports on your manuscript, which are copied below. After careful evaluation of the manuscript and reports, I regret to inform you that I do not find your manuscript suitable for publication in ChemComm. Both of the referees have indicated that some of the conclusions are not suitably supported by the evidence presented, and referee 1 also comments on the general impact of the work. After consideration of these comments, I do not feel that this work is suitable for publication in ChemComm. Further details regarding the reason for this decision are given in the reports.
我第一次投CC，收到信后，仔细查了大量文献，发现我的东西性质还是很有意思的，报道相关的也很少，但我的文章里确实没把我的新颖性突出，结构也没有组织好，我想好好修改后，把文章结构重新组，新颖性突出出，重新投，想大家看下我的审稿意见，不知道这样做有必要没，谢谢大家能提供建议！

回复此楼