24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

[交流] 征集审稿意见啦~~（不怕没奖励，就怕不参与）

审稿意见征集

   学习专业外语的目的之一便是无国界的学术交流。学术交流形式多样，最重要且每个人都必然会参与的方式怕是“发文章”了，将自己做的东西以文章的形式与同领域的人交流。对于研究生而言，有没有论文发表是能否毕业的一个硬性指标，也是对自己研究成果的一个总结和肯定。
   没发过文章的人，把发文章想的很高深。正在写文章的人，愁肠百结，很是痛苦。而发过文章的人最知写文章时的不易，一改再改，不知多少遍，终成初稿。然而在投稿后，大多数人还会面临revise或者reject。也许审稿人和编辑让你revise不止一次，也许审稿人reject的意见令你备受打击。但不管是怎样的revise和reject，优秀的或者“优秀的”审稿人给出他们中肯客观的、亦或是可能让你一时摸不着头脑的意见和评价，加上你自己的解读和努力改进，你的文章终会受益，提高不止一个档次，进而被杂志接收。
   大部分的审稿都是peer-review，很多审稿人都是你所在的研究领域里的大牛。审稿人的意见有的是针对文章的语言，有的针对文章的逻辑，也有的针对方法的严谨性，不一而足。虽然审稿意见是针对具体的一篇文章而言，但对于同行或者初入门的人仍然有很大的参考价值。因此，本版现对“审稿意见”（限外文）进行有奖征集活动。

【奖励设置】每篇审稿意见奖励15个金币（可酌情增额），若附有自己对审稿意见的分析或帖子内容特别好，可酌情奖励SFL-EPI一枚。

赠人玫瑰手有余香
引文互助名鹊重洋

注：为了保护您的隐私，请参与活动的虫友们在回帖时把涉及到研究成果、机密、版权等内容删掉，保留大框架和语言即可。同时，为了方便其他虫友查阅学习，请参与活动的虫友们在回帖时注明所在研究方向（或研究领域）和投稿的杂志名称。

【回帖格式参考】
  研究方向：
  投稿杂志名称（选填）：
  审稿意见：
  个人感想（选填）：

PS：特别感谢okitworks版主~

[ Last edited by zhtear99 on 2012-11-29 at 23:17 ]

回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

论文交流

投稿须知

» 本帖已获得的红花（最新10朵）

古可ぷ

okitworks

昵称让人头疼

myIDname

凌宇雷池

liziyu521

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2012-11-29 16:41:34

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

myIDname

木虫 (著名写手)

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
zhtear99: 回帖置顶 2012-12-01 10:42:25
zhtear99: 金币+10, 感谢顾问童鞋提供的审稿意见，非常完整，还有自己的评价，很棒~ 2012-12-01 13:01:29
zhtear99: 金币+10, 两份审稿意见，所以双份奖励~ 2012-12-01 13:02:08

研究方向：MEMS（microelectro-mechanical systems）
审稿意见：如下所列
个人感想：第二个reviewer看似有点为难我们，提了很多比较刁难人的问题，但是真的很有帮助，尤其是对于如何在已经有了好的idea的情况下，怎么事半功倍证明这个idea漂亮。后来我们回复之后，这个reviewer还又来了一个问题，所以还有第二次答复。最终reviewer可能比较满意吧，给我们文章打分比较高，最后被收到了杂志的年度highlight里面（显摆一下，只有3%的文章被收录了

）

Referee report

First referee's report

The concept is very interesting. The manuscript is very well written. The conclusions are supported by experimental data. Of course a good job!

Second referee's report

This work presents a new exciting idea to develop a XXX which has good potential. Authors have however failed to demonstrate clearly the benefits of their device. In Figure 7 the slope of the straight heated and XXX heated curve look very similar except for probably initial 2-3 secs. The two cooling mechanisms look to saturate at two different temperatures. It means that the thermal resistances of the two systems are different and are hence not completely comparable. The absolute difference in final temperature is of little consequence as a different heat-sink for the straight cooled device can reach the similar final temperature with a similar time delay. The benefit of the presented device is that it will allow any MEMS device to reach its final operating temperature quickly with minimal energy loss and then maintain the operating temperature. So it is recommended that the authors comment of the initial slope of the two curves (or compare the energy lost in reaching the final state) and compare their device with respect to the straight cooled device. Authors can also consider devicing an experiment in which both the systems reach the similar final temperature and demonstrate the benefit of the XXX.

Authors are also recommended to discuss the temperature jump in initial 2-3 seconds for the no heatsink and the XXX case.

The authors have presented a very good overview of the existing technology. The applicability of this technology, however, depends on availability of different XXXX. Authors are recommended to present a few exemplary XXXX’s to show that this technology can be tuned for different applications requiring different turn on temperatures.

The authors are requested to present a labeled cross section schematic of the displacement experiment i.e. figure 2 a.

5 mm droplet is sometimes too large for many MEMS applications. Also to achieve a better local thermal control the authors would like to design the heating array with as small a droplet as possible. Therefore the authors are recommended to discuss the effect of droplet miniaturization on the maximum displacement that can be achieved reversibly while considering the increasing effect of surface tension.

The device schematic as shown has XXXX domes trapped in holes on copper plate. It is stated that the XXXX wets copper in its molten state. Then during operation of the device when the XXXX is in liquid phase how do the authors prevent the droplets to spread and wet the whole copper surface? Even if the wetting is slow, it will affect the long term operation of the device.