| 查看: 4169 | 回复: 61 | |||||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||||
[交流]
征集审稿意见啦~~(不怕没奖励,就怕不参与)
|
|||||
[ Last edited by zhtear99 on 2012-11-29 at 23:17 ] |
» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
论文交流 | 投稿须知 |
» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)
» 本帖@通知
» 猜你喜欢
国家基金申请书模板内插入图片不可调整大小?
已经有9人回复
退学或坚持读
已经有20人回复
免疫学博士有名额,速联系
已经有14人回复
面上基金申报没有其他的参与者成吗
已经有4人回复
多组分精馏求助
已经有6人回复
国家级人才课题组招收2026年入学博士
已经有6人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
请大家帮忙看下这个审稿意见怎么处理好
已经有22人回复
编辑给的审稿意见,怎么解答啊~~谢谢亲们~~
已经有6人回复
请教一下这样的审稿意见是什么意思?拜谢~
已经有3人回复
审稿意见回复,求助
已经有10人回复
【FESE】征集审稿人
已经有9人回复
关于optics communication 如何推荐审稿专家的问题
已经有4人回复
[求助] sci论文revise, 其中一个拒稿的审稿人意见该如何回复?
已经有14人回复
审稿意见如何回复,求助
已经有4人回复
一审意见回来了,一个审稿人竭力推荐发表,另一个认为无新意...
已经有34人回复
编辑给的审稿意见怎么看都像少了一个人的,怎么办?
已经有5人回复
审稿意见回来了,要补做实验,但实验条件不够
已经有12人回复
审稿意见怎么回复
已经有3人回复
请教大家一个审稿意见问题~
已经有3人回复
会议论文同意接收后,怎么对待审稿意见?
已经有9人回复
JPD的审稿意见在哪里啊??急~~~~~
已经有14人回复
对审稿意见的回复
已经有11人回复
谁见过这样的审稿意见?
已经有34人回复
审稿意见,大家帮忙看看
已经有8人回复
外文审稿意见
已经有6人回复
审稿意见回答
已经有28人回复
审稿意见回复请教
已经有4人回复
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
哈尔滨工程大学青岛创新发展基地招聘青年教师
+1/514
南方科技大学周友运课题组诚聘博士后、科研助理
+1/173
多功能 电子微生物生长分析仪 及 微生物快检技术开发服务
+2/156
电力全国重点实验室双一流A类长江学者团队招2026年全日制博士1-2名/博士后
+2/80
美国R1大学--德克萨斯大学埃尔帕索分校(UTEP) 土木、环境与建筑工程系 博士招生
+1/76
博后平台选择
+1/67
中国石油大学(北京)国家级大人才团队博士招生2名:化学、材料、石油工程:油田化学
+2/63
大连工业大学 超临界流体技术团队(纺材学院)招收2026级“申请-考核制”博士生
+1/55
香港科技大学计算物理及流体力学课题组招收全奖博士后及博士生(2026年9月入学)
+1/45
山东科技大学招聘化学化工博士博士后
+1/31
教育部重点实验室和清华大学某国家重点实验室,联合培养硕生、博生,并长期招博士后
+1/30
江西理工大学 稀土学院 稀土功能材料方向 招收2026届博士研究生、硕士研究生
+1/29
山东科技大学招聘化学化工博士博士后
+1/28
中国科学院上海光学精密机械研究所 特种强激光薄膜课题组
+1/25
西班牙巴塞罗那访学、博后、留学互动
+1/11
《中文期刊点评》这个模块,怎么不能点评期刊了呢自动跳转到主页了
+1/5
复旦大学化学系凡勇教授/张凡教授团队招聘博士后
+1/4
生信(包括AI)博后招聘(3名):美国德州理工大学健康科学中心
+1/2
澳科大诚招2026年秋季全奖博士研究生(药剂学/生物材料方向)
+1/1
广东省智能院与澳门大学/澳门理工联培博士招生
+1/1
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
zhtear99: 回帖置顶 2012-12-01 10:42:25
zhtear99: 金币+10, 感谢顾问童鞋提供的审稿意见,非常完整,还有自己的评价,很棒~ 2012-12-01 13:01:29
zhtear99: 金币+10, 两份审稿意见,所以双份奖励~ 2012-12-01 13:02:08
zhtear99: 回帖置顶 2012-12-01 10:42:25
zhtear99: 金币+10, 感谢顾问童鞋提供的审稿意见,非常完整,还有自己的评价,很棒~ 2012-12-01 13:01:29
zhtear99: 金币+10, 两份审稿意见,所以双份奖励~ 2012-12-01 13:02:08
|
研究方向:MEMS(microelectro-mechanical systems) 审稿意见:如下所列 个人感想:第二个reviewer看似有点为难我们,提了很多比较刁难人的问题,但是真的很有帮助,尤其是对于如何在已经有了好的idea的情况下,怎么事半功倍证明这个idea漂亮。后来我们回复之后,这个reviewer还又来了一个问题,所以还有第二次答复。最终reviewer可能比较满意吧,给我们文章打分比较高,最后被收到了杂志的年度highlight里面(显摆一下,只有3%的文章被收录了 )Referee report First referee's report The concept is very interesting. The manuscript is very well written. The conclusions are supported by experimental data. Of course a good job! Second referee's report This work presents a new exciting idea to develop a XXX which has good potential. Authors have however failed to demonstrate clearly the benefits of their device. In Figure 7 the slope of the straight heated and XXX heated curve look very similar except for probably initial 2-3 secs. The two cooling mechanisms look to saturate at two different temperatures. It means that the thermal resistances of the two systems are different and are hence not completely comparable. The absolute difference in final temperature is of little consequence as a different heat-sink for the straight cooled device can reach the similar final temperature with a similar time delay. The benefit of the presented device is that it will allow any MEMS device to reach its final operating temperature quickly with minimal energy loss and then maintain the operating temperature. So it is recommended that the authors comment of the initial slope of the two curves (or compare the energy lost in reaching the final state) and compare their device with respect to the straight cooled device. Authors can also consider devicing an experiment in which both the systems reach the similar final temperature and demonstrate the benefit of the XXX. Authors are also recommended to discuss the temperature jump in initial 2-3 seconds for the no heatsink and the XXX case. The authors have presented a very good overview of the existing technology. The applicability of this technology, however, depends on availability of different XXXX. Authors are recommended to present a few exemplary XXXX’s to show that this technology can be tuned for different applications requiring different turn on temperatures. The authors are requested to present a labeled cross section schematic of the displacement experiment i.e. figure 2 a. 5 mm droplet is sometimes too large for many MEMS applications. Also to achieve a better local thermal control the authors would like to design the heating array with as small a droplet as possible. Therefore the authors are recommended to discuss the effect of droplet miniaturization on the maximum displacement that can be achieved reversibly while considering the increasing effect of surface tension. The device schematic as shown has XXXX domes trapped in holes on copper plate. It is stated that the XXXX wets copper in its molten state. Then during operation of the device when the XXXX is in liquid phase how do the authors prevent the droplets to spread and wet the whole copper surface? Even if the wetting is slow, it will affect the long term operation of the device. |
50楼2012-12-01 10:18:11
2楼2012-11-29 16:42:12
3楼2012-11-29 16:47:48
4楼2012-11-29 16:55:23















回复此楼
古可ぷ
)


