| 查看: 4346 | 回复: 61 | |||||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||||
[交流]
征集审稿意见啦~~(不怕没奖励,就怕不参与)
|
|||||
[ Last edited by zhtear99 on 2012-11-29 at 23:17 ] |
» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
论文交流 | 投稿须知 |
» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)
» 本帖@通知
» 猜你喜欢
求调剂
已经有3人回复
265求调剂
已经有4人回复
085700资源与环境308求调剂
已经有6人回复
一志愿吉林大学材料学硕321求调剂
已经有12人回复
286分人工智能专业请求调剂愿意跨考!
已经有3人回复
329求调剂
已经有5人回复
申请回稿延期一个月,编辑同意了。但系统上的时间没变,给编辑又写邮件了,没回复
已经有4人回复
材料学硕318求调剂
已经有5人回复
一志愿中国海洋大学,生物学,301分,求调剂
已经有6人回复
081700化工学硕调剂
已经有3人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
请大家帮忙看下这个审稿意见怎么处理好
已经有22人回复
编辑给的审稿意见,怎么解答啊~~谢谢亲们~~
已经有6人回复
请教一下这样的审稿意见是什么意思?拜谢~
已经有3人回复
审稿意见回复,求助
已经有10人回复
【FESE】征集审稿人
已经有9人回复
关于optics communication 如何推荐审稿专家的问题
已经有4人回复
[求助] sci论文revise, 其中一个拒稿的审稿人意见该如何回复?
已经有14人回复
审稿意见如何回复,求助
已经有4人回复
一审意见回来了,一个审稿人竭力推荐发表,另一个认为无新意...
已经有34人回复
编辑给的审稿意见怎么看都像少了一个人的,怎么办?
已经有5人回复
审稿意见回来了,要补做实验,但实验条件不够
已经有12人回复
审稿意见怎么回复
已经有3人回复
请教大家一个审稿意见问题~
已经有3人回复
会议论文同意接收后,怎么对待审稿意见?
已经有9人回复
JPD的审稿意见在哪里啊??急~~~~~
已经有14人回复
对审稿意见的回复
已经有11人回复
谁见过这样的审稿意见?
已经有34人回复
审稿意见,大家帮忙看看
已经有8人回复
外文审稿意见
已经有6人回复
审稿意见回答
已经有28人回复
审稿意见回复请教
已经有4人回复
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
文献分享,欢迎引用
+1/91
招收调剂生,动物医学专业
+1/89
重庆医科大学神经科学中心/病生与生理系诚邀海内外优秀博士加盟博士后队伍(长期)
+1/81
飘在美国,有点想家
+1/53
华南师范大学(211)博士招生- 电子、自动化、机械、生物学、物理相关专业
+2/42
哈工大郑州高等研究院刘绍琴与查正宝教授课题组诚招合成生物学背景相关的优秀人才加盟
+1/34
华南师范大学(211)申请审核制博士招生- 电子、自动化、机械、生物学、物理相关专业
+1/24
---大龄的未婚男找结婚女对象
+1/20
湖南大学微生物结构与功能实验室2026年计划招收博士研究生
+1/20
浙江中医药大学副校长团队招聘药学/生物信息学等方向高校教师7名,报名通道已开启
+1/19
招收专业代码08的学硕!
+1/16
北京某研究院生物化学与分子生物学相关专业申请考核制博士招生(春季)
+1/12
青岛科技大学可持续高分子团队 考研招生
+1/7
华中科技大学管理学院招聘社会用工(科研助理)1名
+1/6
国家级人才团队诚聘生物信息相关专业的科研助理
+1/5
欢迎加入赣南师范大学先进光电子研究中心
+1/4
“机械、材料”招生
+1/3
课题组招收环境及相关专业调剂硕士研究生(欢迎优秀学生加入)
+1/2
北京大学环境学院张子帅研究员招收科研助理
+1/1
【2026年春季补录】厦门大学田中群院士/易骏教授纳米光子学团队招收2026年入学博士生
+1/1
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
zhtear99: 回帖置顶 2012-12-01 10:42:25
zhtear99: 金币+10, 感谢顾问童鞋提供的审稿意见,非常完整,还有自己的评价,很棒~ 2012-12-01 13:01:29
zhtear99: 金币+10, 两份审稿意见,所以双份奖励~ 2012-12-01 13:02:08
zhtear99: 回帖置顶 2012-12-01 10:42:25
zhtear99: 金币+10, 感谢顾问童鞋提供的审稿意见,非常完整,还有自己的评价,很棒~ 2012-12-01 13:01:29
zhtear99: 金币+10, 两份审稿意见,所以双份奖励~ 2012-12-01 13:02:08
|
研究方向:MEMS(microelectro-mechanical systems) 审稿意见:如下所列 个人感想:第二个reviewer看似有点为难我们,提了很多比较刁难人的问题,但是真的很有帮助,尤其是对于如何在已经有了好的idea的情况下,怎么事半功倍证明这个idea漂亮。后来我们回复之后,这个reviewer还又来了一个问题,所以还有第二次答复。最终reviewer可能比较满意吧,给我们文章打分比较高,最后被收到了杂志的年度highlight里面(显摆一下,只有3%的文章被收录了 )Referee report First referee's report The concept is very interesting. The manuscript is very well written. The conclusions are supported by experimental data. Of course a good job! Second referee's report This work presents a new exciting idea to develop a XXX which has good potential. Authors have however failed to demonstrate clearly the benefits of their device. In Figure 7 the slope of the straight heated and XXX heated curve look very similar except for probably initial 2-3 secs. The two cooling mechanisms look to saturate at two different temperatures. It means that the thermal resistances of the two systems are different and are hence not completely comparable. The absolute difference in final temperature is of little consequence as a different heat-sink for the straight cooled device can reach the similar final temperature with a similar time delay. The benefit of the presented device is that it will allow any MEMS device to reach its final operating temperature quickly with minimal energy loss and then maintain the operating temperature. So it is recommended that the authors comment of the initial slope of the two curves (or compare the energy lost in reaching the final state) and compare their device with respect to the straight cooled device. Authors can also consider devicing an experiment in which both the systems reach the similar final temperature and demonstrate the benefit of the XXX. Authors are also recommended to discuss the temperature jump in initial 2-3 seconds for the no heatsink and the XXX case. The authors have presented a very good overview of the existing technology. The applicability of this technology, however, depends on availability of different XXXX. Authors are recommended to present a few exemplary XXXX’s to show that this technology can be tuned for different applications requiring different turn on temperatures. The authors are requested to present a labeled cross section schematic of the displacement experiment i.e. figure 2 a. 5 mm droplet is sometimes too large for many MEMS applications. Also to achieve a better local thermal control the authors would like to design the heating array with as small a droplet as possible. Therefore the authors are recommended to discuss the effect of droplet miniaturization on the maximum displacement that can be achieved reversibly while considering the increasing effect of surface tension. The device schematic as shown has XXXX domes trapped in holes on copper plate. It is stated that the XXXX wets copper in its molten state. Then during operation of the device when the XXXX is in liquid phase how do the authors prevent the droplets to spread and wet the whole copper surface? Even if the wetting is slow, it will affect the long term operation of the device. |
50楼2012-12-01 10:18:11
2楼2012-11-29 16:42:12
3楼2012-11-29 16:47:48
4楼2012-11-29 16:55:23















回复此楼
古可ぷ
)


