| 查看: 5612 | 回复: 61 | |||||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||||
[交流]
征集审稿意见啦~~(不怕没奖励,就怕不参与)
|
|||||
[ Last edited by zhtear99 on 2012-11-29 at 23:17 ] |
» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
论文交流 | 投稿须知 |
» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)
» 本帖@通知
» 猜你喜欢
面上项目filecode邪修
已经有4人回复
2026国自然放榜时间
已经有4人回复
关于代码变化问题,想知道的进来
已经有22人回复
应该是93bebmhtak前后十一个字符比较关键
已经有13人回复
这样的filecode谁见过
已经有21人回复
filecode与中标关系的预测
已经有5人回复
fileCode有新解读?
已经有18人回复
关于filecode,很负责任的告诉大家
已经有7人回复
【2027博士申请】纳米药物递送方向
已经有5人回复
关于豆爷回答的JTJC与%2F数量
已经有7人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
请大家帮忙看下这个审稿意见怎么处理好
已经有22人回复
编辑给的审稿意见,怎么解答啊~~谢谢亲们~~
已经有6人回复
请教一下这样的审稿意见是什么意思?拜谢~
已经有3人回复
审稿意见回复,求助
已经有10人回复
【FESE】征集审稿人
已经有9人回复
关于optics communication 如何推荐审稿专家的问题
已经有4人回复
[求助] sci论文revise, 其中一个拒稿的审稿人意见该如何回复?
已经有14人回复
审稿意见如何回复,求助
已经有4人回复
一审意见回来了,一个审稿人竭力推荐发表,另一个认为无新意...
已经有34人回复
编辑给的审稿意见怎么看都像少了一个人的,怎么办?
已经有5人回复
审稿意见回来了,要补做实验,但实验条件不够
已经有12人回复
审稿意见怎么回复
已经有3人回复
请教大家一个审稿意见问题~
已经有3人回复
会议论文同意接收后,怎么对待审稿意见?
已经有9人回复
JPD的审稿意见在哪里啊??急~~~~~
已经有14人回复
对审稿意见的回复
已经有11人回复
谁见过这样的审稿意见?
已经有34人回复
审稿意见,大家帮忙看看
已经有8人回复
外文审稿意见
已经有6人回复
审稿意见回答
已经有28人回复
审稿意见回复请教
已经有4人回复
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
一边期待,一边忐忑:发榜前的科研人正在想什么?
+5/265
三氟甲基亚磺酸锂
+1/86
3,4-二(三甲基硅氧基)-1-丁烯(CAS:89543-84-0)
+1/86
三(三甲基硅基)硼酸酯(CAS:4325-85-3)
+1/86
具身智能机器人公司招聘硬件工程师岗位 预算100万内
+1/79
中国科学技术大学-苏州国家实验室联培招生-本科直博/硕博连读/申请考核三种方式
+1/79
香港城市大学郑星课题组诚聘博士后 (生态学、环境科学、植物学、大气科学背景)
+1/78
2027 Chemical Engineering Ph.D 招生
+1/39
中国石油大学(华东)计算机科学与技术学院/智能化新能源系统设计和开发方向 特聘副教
+2/36
哈尔滨工业大学郑州高等研究院查正宝研究员招收博士/硕士
+1/29
同济大学环境学院肖倩课题组2026年补充招收推免生
+1/28
中国科学院西双版纳热带植物园人事处招聘
+1/27
哈工大(深圳)何自开团队诚招2027级化学工程与技术专业博士生
+1/27
哈工大(深圳)何自开团队诚招化学工程与技术专业博士生
+1/26
北京理工大学-集成电路与电子学院杰青团队-招博士后
+1/24
希望大家都高中!!
+1/7
夏尽秋来,蓄力沉淀,静待硕果成文
+1/4
苏州大学能源学院管大秦课题组诚聘博士后及招收博士/硕士研究生
+1/4
悉尼科技大学(QS 第87)数据科学/AI招收2027年秋季入学全奖及CSC博士生
+1/4
27届申博求助
+1/3
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
zhtear99: 回帖置顶 2012-12-01 10:42:25
zhtear99: 金币+10, 感谢顾问童鞋提供的审稿意见,非常完整,还有自己的评价,很棒~ 2012-12-01 13:01:29
zhtear99: 金币+10, 两份审稿意见,所以双份奖励~ 2012-12-01 13:02:08
zhtear99: 回帖置顶 2012-12-01 10:42:25
zhtear99: 金币+10, 感谢顾问童鞋提供的审稿意见,非常完整,还有自己的评价,很棒~ 2012-12-01 13:01:29
zhtear99: 金币+10, 两份审稿意见,所以双份奖励~ 2012-12-01 13:02:08
|
研究方向:MEMS(microelectro-mechanical systems) 审稿意见:如下所列 个人感想:第二个reviewer看似有点为难我们,提了很多比较刁难人的问题,但是真的很有帮助,尤其是对于如何在已经有了好的idea的情况下,怎么事半功倍证明这个idea漂亮。后来我们回复之后,这个reviewer还又来了一个问题,所以还有第二次答复。最终reviewer可能比较满意吧,给我们文章打分比较高,最后被收到了杂志的年度highlight里面(显摆一下,只有3%的文章被收录了 )Referee report First referee's report The concept is very interesting. The manuscript is very well written. The conclusions are supported by experimental data. Of course a good job! Second referee's report This work presents a new exciting idea to develop a XXX which has good potential. Authors have however failed to demonstrate clearly the benefits of their device. In Figure 7 the slope of the straight heated and XXX heated curve look very similar except for probably initial 2-3 secs. The two cooling mechanisms look to saturate at two different temperatures. It means that the thermal resistances of the two systems are different and are hence not completely comparable. The absolute difference in final temperature is of little consequence as a different heat-sink for the straight cooled device can reach the similar final temperature with a similar time delay. The benefit of the presented device is that it will allow any MEMS device to reach its final operating temperature quickly with minimal energy loss and then maintain the operating temperature. So it is recommended that the authors comment of the initial slope of the two curves (or compare the energy lost in reaching the final state) and compare their device with respect to the straight cooled device. Authors can also consider devicing an experiment in which both the systems reach the similar final temperature and demonstrate the benefit of the XXX. Authors are also recommended to discuss the temperature jump in initial 2-3 seconds for the no heatsink and the XXX case. The authors have presented a very good overview of the existing technology. The applicability of this technology, however, depends on availability of different XXXX. Authors are recommended to present a few exemplary XXXX’s to show that this technology can be tuned for different applications requiring different turn on temperatures. The authors are requested to present a labeled cross section schematic of the displacement experiment i.e. figure 2 a. 5 mm droplet is sometimes too large for many MEMS applications. Also to achieve a better local thermal control the authors would like to design the heating array with as small a droplet as possible. Therefore the authors are recommended to discuss the effect of droplet miniaturization on the maximum displacement that can be achieved reversibly while considering the increasing effect of surface tension. The device schematic as shown has XXXX domes trapped in holes on copper plate. It is stated that the XXXX wets copper in its molten state. Then during operation of the device when the XXXX is in liquid phase how do the authors prevent the droplets to spread and wet the whole copper surface? Even if the wetting is slow, it will affect the long term operation of the device. |
50楼2012-12-01 10:18:11
lxg133298
荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)
-

专家经验: +201 - 应助: 511 (博士)
- 贵宾: 6.494
- 金币: 86353.6
- 帖子: 53470
- 在线: 6508.9小时
- 虫号: 1451437
2楼2012-11-29 16:42:12
3楼2012-11-29 16:47:48
lxg133298
荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)
-

专家经验: +201 - 应助: 511 (博士)
- 贵宾: 6.494
- 金币: 86353.6
- 帖子: 53470
- 在线: 6508.9小时
- 虫号: 1451437
4楼2012-11-29 16:55:23












回复此楼
古可ぷ
)

