| ²é¿´: 960 | »Ø¸´: 4 | ||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | ||
zgm123456½ð³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[ÇóÖú]
ÇóÖú£¬ÉñÄÅ£¬¾È¾ÈÎÒ°É
|
|
|
СµÜµÄһƪÎÄÕÂÉó¸åÒâ¼û»ØÀ´ÁË£¬ÎÄÕÂСµÜ²âÁ˵绯ѧ£¬»¯ºÏÎïÀïÃæÓжþ¼ÛÍ£¬ÔÚÑ»··ü°²ÇúÏßÉÏÔÚ183MV´¦Ö»ÓÐ͵ÄÑõ»¯·å£¬Ã»Óл¹Ô·å£¨²»¿ÉÄæµÄ·å£©£¬Éó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼ûÊÇ£ºin 2, the cupper is already at the oxidation number of II, so it is difficult to understand the presence of this wave. That would means, firstly the reduction at the electrode of the Cu(II) to Cu(I) and then the oxidation during the scan. But dispropotionation of Cu(I) can also occurs! Why author find irreversible wave ? Usually, such wave must be observed during the reduction of Cu(II) to Cu(I) follow by the disproportionnation to Cu(0) and Cu(II). ³õѧµç»¯Ñ§²âÊÔ£¬ÊÇÔÚ²»Ã÷°×Ôõô½âÊÍ£¬µ¼Ê¦ÓÖ²»¹Ü£¬ÇóÖú¸÷λ´óÏÀÁË£¬Ð»Ð»°¡ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Òâ´óÀû²©ÂåÄáÑÇ´óѧÕÐÆ¸Ñо¿ÖúÀí2Ãû£¨2D²ÄÁÏ/ï®Àë×ÓÓëÄÆÀë×Óµç³Ø·½Ïò£©
ÒѾÓÐ1È˻ظ´
¹ØÓÚ̼Á¿×ӵ㿹¾úµÄÑо¿
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
ÎïÀí»¯Ñ§ÂÛÎÄÈóÉ«/·ÒëÔõôÊÕ·Ñ?
ÒѾÓÐ122È˻ظ´
ÄÏ´ó»¯Ñ§µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
ÁòËáÄÆÈÜҺŨ¶ÈÓëÃܶÈÇúÏß
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
0703µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ2È˻ظ´
1
ÒѾÓÐ19È˻ظ´
0703 µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
ÕÐÊÕ
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
Î÷ÄÏij211ÕÐ27½ì²©Ê¿
ÒѾÓÐ21È˻ظ´
CupidÔÆ
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
Johnson
- Ó¦Öú: 59 (³õÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 2858.3
- É¢½ð: 47
- ºì»¨: 6
- Ìû×Ó: 903
- ÔÚÏß: 225.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1519763
- ×¢²á: 2011-12-02
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ºËÎïÀí

5Â¥2012-11-08 11:34:51
ÔÚËûÏçA
Òø³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 266.7
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 129
- ÔÚÏß: 87.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1780143
- ×¢²á: 2012-04-26
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: µç»¯Ñ§·ÖÎö
2Â¥2012-11-08 08:56:12
CupidÔÆ
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
Johnson
- Ó¦Öú: 59 (³õÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 2858.3
- É¢½ð: 47
- ºì»¨: 6
- Ìû×Ó: 903
- ÔÚÏß: 225.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1519763
- ×¢²á: 2011-12-02
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ºËÎïÀí

3Â¥2012-11-08 08:59:35
zgm123456
½ð³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1815.2
- Ìû×Ó: 206
- ÔÚÏß: 51.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1294544
- ×¢²á: 2011-05-13
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ×ÊÔ´»¯¹¤
4Â¥2012-11-08 09:05:11













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥