| ²é¿´: 1040 | »Ø¸´: 4 | ||
zgm123456½ð³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[ÇóÖú]
ÇóÖú£¬ÉñÄÅ£¬¾È¾ÈÎÒ°É
|
|
СµÜµÄһƪÎÄÕÂÉó¸åÒâ¼û»ØÀ´ÁË£¬ÎÄÕÂСµÜ²âÁ˵绯ѧ£¬»¯ºÏÎïÀïÃæÓжþ¼ÛÍ£¬ÔÚÑ»··ü°²ÇúÏßÉÏÔÚ183MV´¦Ö»ÓÐ͵ÄÑõ»¯·å£¬Ã»Óл¹Ô·å£¨²»¿ÉÄæµÄ·å£©£¬Éó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼ûÊÇ£ºin 2, the cupper is already at the oxidation number of II, so it is difficult to understand the presence of this wave. That would means, firstly the reduction at the electrode of the Cu(II) to Cu(I) and then the oxidation during the scan. But dispropotionation of Cu(I) can also occurs! Why author find irreversible wave ? Usually, such wave must be observed during the reduction of Cu(II) to Cu(I) follow by the disproportionnation to Cu(0) and Cu(II). ³õѧµç»¯Ñ§²âÊÔ£¬ÊÇÔÚ²»Ã÷°×Ôõô½âÊÍ£¬µ¼Ê¦ÓÖ²»¹Ü£¬ÇóÖú¸÷λ´óÏÀÁË£¬Ð»Ð»°¡ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
26Äêµç³Ø·½Ïò²©Ê¿ÉêÇë
ÒѾÓÐ2È˻ظ´
¹ØÓÚ·ÏÑõ»¯ÂÁÖÆ±¸¾ÛÂÈ»¯ÂÁµÄÏÖ×´
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
ÎïÀí»¯Ñ§ÂÛÎÄÈóÉ«/·ÒëÔõôÊÕ·Ñ?
ÒѾÓÐ216È˻ظ´
¸ß²ã´ÎÈ˲ÅÕÐÆ¸
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
»ªÖÐũҵ´óѧֲÎï¿ÆÑ§¼¼ÊõѧԺÀî¹úÌïÀÏʦ¿ÎÌâ×éÀͶ¯Æ¸ÓÃÖÆ¿ÆÑÐÖúÀíÕÐÆ¸¹«¸æ
ÒѾÓÐ20È˻ظ´
endnote¹ÙÍø´ò²»¿ª
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
ÍÆ¼öÒ»¿î˼·ÐÂÓ±µÄÂÛÎÄд×÷¹¤¾ßFlowing
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
´×ËáÑÎÌåϵÈܽºÄý½º·¨ºÏ³É¸»ï®ÃÌ»ùÕý¼«
ÒѾÓÐ1È˻ظ´
Å£»ÇËáÄÆ
ÒѾÓÐ1È˻ظ´
Renlab@monashÈ«½±²©Ê¿»ú»á£¬×îºóÈýÌ죡
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
ÔÚËûÏçA
Òø³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 266.7
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 129
- ÔÚÏß: 87.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1780143
- ×¢²á: 2012-04-26
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: µç»¯Ñ§·ÖÎö
2Â¥2012-11-08 08:56:12
CupidÔÆ
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
Johnson
- Ó¦Öú: 59 (³õÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 2858.3
- É¢½ð: 47
- ºì»¨: 6
- Ìû×Ó: 903
- ÔÚÏß: 225.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1519763
- ×¢²á: 2011-12-02
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ºËÎïÀí

3Â¥2012-11-08 08:59:35
zgm123456
½ð³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1815.2
- Ìû×Ó: 206
- ÔÚÏß: 51.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1294544
- ×¢²á: 2011-05-13
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ×ÊÔ´»¯¹¤
4Â¥2012-11-08 09:05:11
CupidÔÆ
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
Johnson
- Ó¦Öú: 59 (³õÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 2858.3
- É¢½ð: 47
- ºì»¨: 6
- Ìû×Ó: 903
- ÔÚÏß: 225.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1519763
- ×¢²á: 2011-12-02
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ºËÎïÀí

5Â¥2012-11-08 11:34:51











»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
10