| ²é¿´: 969 | »Ø¸´: 4 | |||
zgm123456½ð³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[ÇóÖú]
ÇóÖú£¬ÉñÄÅ£¬¾È¾ÈÎÒ°É
|
|
СµÜµÄһƪÎÄÕÂÉó¸åÒâ¼û»ØÀ´ÁË£¬ÎÄÕÂСµÜ²âÁ˵绯ѧ£¬»¯ºÏÎïÀïÃæÓжþ¼ÛÍ£¬ÔÚÑ»··ü°²ÇúÏßÉÏÔÚ183MV´¦Ö»ÓÐ͵ÄÑõ»¯·å£¬Ã»Óл¹Ô·å£¨²»¿ÉÄæµÄ·å£©£¬Éó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼ûÊÇ£ºin 2, the cupper is already at the oxidation number of II, so it is difficult to understand the presence of this wave. That would means, firstly the reduction at the electrode of the Cu(II) to Cu(I) and then the oxidation during the scan. But dispropotionation of Cu(I) can also occurs! Why author find irreversible wave ? Usually, such wave must be observed during the reduction of Cu(II) to Cu(I) follow by the disproportionnation to Cu(0) and Cu(II). ³õѧµç»¯Ñ§²âÊÔ£¬ÊÇÔÚ²»Ã÷°×Ôõô½âÊÍ£¬µ¼Ê¦ÓÖ²»¹Ü£¬ÇóÖú¸÷λ´óÏÀÁË£¬Ð»Ð»°¡ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
070300 Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ1È˻ظ´
ÉîÛÚ´óѧ¸ßµÈÑо¿ÔºÕÔΰ¿ÎÌâ×éÕÐÊÕ»¯Ñ§µ÷¼ÁÉú
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
ÎïÀí»¯Ñ§ÂÛÎÄÈóÉ«/·ÒëÔõôÊÕ·Ñ?
ÒѾÓÐ265È˻ظ´
Çൺ´óѧ¹Ì̬µç³ØÑо¿ÍŶÓÕÐÊÕ²ÄÁÏ¡¢»¯Ñ§¡¢ÎïÀíµÈ·½Ïò²©Ê¿Ñо¿Éú
ÒѾÓÐ32È˻ظ´
»¯Ñ§¹¤³Ì085602 305·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
È£²¡ÓëÑÀÖܲ¡µÄ±íÊö
ÒѾÓÐ1È˻ظ´
070300»¯Ñ§Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
Î人·ÄÖ¯´óѧȫ¹úÖØµãʵÑéÊÒÑîÓ¦¿ü½ÌÊÚÍŶÓÄâÕÐ17-19λ˶²©Éú£¡
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤×¨Ë¶½ÓÊÜ¿çרҵµ÷¼Á£¨ÖØÇìÊÐÊô¸ßУ£©
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
Î人·ÄÖ¯´óѧȫ¹úÖØµãʵÑéÊÒÑîÓ¦¿ü½ÌÊÚÍŶÓÄâÕÐ17-19λ˶²©Éú£¡
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
070300 »¯Ñ§Ñ§Ë¶ ³õÊÔ357·Ö bÇøÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ1È˻ظ´
ÔÚËûÏçA
Òø³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 266.7
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 129
- ÔÚÏß: 87.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1780143
- ×¢²á: 2012-04-26
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: µç»¯Ñ§·ÖÎö
2Â¥2012-11-08 08:56:12
CupidÔÆ
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
Johnson
- Ó¦Öú: 59 (³õÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 2858.3
- É¢½ð: 47
- ºì»¨: 6
- Ìû×Ó: 903
- ÔÚÏß: 225.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1519763
- ×¢²á: 2011-12-02
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ºËÎïÀí

3Â¥2012-11-08 08:59:35
zgm123456
½ð³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1815.2
- Ìû×Ó: 206
- ÔÚÏß: 51.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1294544
- ×¢²á: 2011-05-13
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ×ÊÔ´»¯¹¤
4Â¥2012-11-08 09:05:11
CupidÔÆ
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
Johnson
- Ó¦Öú: 59 (³õÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 2858.3
- É¢½ð: 47
- ºì»¨: 6
- Ìû×Ó: 903
- ÔÚÏß: 225.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1519763
- ×¢²á: 2011-12-02
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ºËÎïÀí

5Â¥2012-11-08 11:34:51














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥