| 查看: 1278 | 回复: 8 | |||
[交流]
盼星星盼月亮盼来了令人纠结的审稿意见，求指教~~~
|
|||
|
往Chemical Engineering & Technology投了一篇文章，两个月后收到两个审稿人意见，一个建议发表，另一个说： This paper is a good attempt at tackling an important issue for the spray nozzle technology: gas liquid two-phase flow in the gas around liquid spray nozzle by means of CFD simulations. It suffers, however, from a lack of in-depth study, a comprehensive knowledge of the existing literature, and a professional English writing. 然后给了几条意见，其中一条： 2) Literature review The literature survey, which is supposed to provide evidences of originality for the research, is very immature. Please update it till 2012. 这是说我引言部分的研究背景分析不行么？该如何修改呢，加多几篇新文献写全面点么？求指教~~~ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
极限拉扯，如何抉择
已经有16人回复
-
40+中年人失业后，还能找到好工作吗？
已经有16人回复
-
人工智能虚构史料、伪造文献频现，多家期刊声明抵制
已经有4人回复
-
CsPbI2Br全无机钙钛矿SEM图像异常分析
已经有8人回复
-
用NBS溴化时溶剂除了CCl4外还有什么
已经有9人回复
-
申请科研项目纯靠实力能成功吗？
已经有12人回复
2楼2012-10-27 01:27:20
3楼2012-10-27 02:31:38
5楼2012-10-27 05:40:12
6楼2012-10-27 07:38:18
9楼2012-10-27 12:27:28
简单回复
2012-10-27 05:10
回复
imaple(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2012-10-27 08:14
回复
挪威的海盗8楼
2012-10-27 12:24
回复