| 查看: 1298 | 回复: 8 | |||
[交流]
盼星星盼月亮盼来了令人纠结的审稿意见，求指教~~~
|
|||
|
往Chemical Engineering & Technology投了一篇文章，两个月后收到两个审稿人意见，一个建议发表，另一个说： This paper is a good attempt at tackling an important issue for the spray nozzle technology: gas liquid two-phase flow in the gas around liquid spray nozzle by means of CFD simulations. It suffers, however, from a lack of in-depth study, a comprehensive knowledge of the existing literature, and a professional English writing. 然后给了几条意见，其中一条： 2) Literature review The literature survey, which is supposed to provide evidences of originality for the research, is very immature. Please update it till 2012. 这是说我引言部分的研究背景分析不行么？该如何修改呢，加多几篇新文献写全面点么？求指教~~~ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有6人回复
-
延安大学回应“副教授留绝笔信”：确已离世，正核实举报内容
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有23人回复
2楼2012-10-27 01:27:20
3楼2012-10-27 02:31:38
5楼2012-10-27 05:40:12
6楼2012-10-27 07:38:18
9楼2012-10-27 12:27:28
简单回复
2012-10-27 05:10
回复
imaple(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2012-10-27 08:14
回复
挪威的海盗8楼
2012-10-27 12:24
回复
