| 查看: 508 | 回复: 1 | ||||
kellyhuizi新虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
论文在REVISE中的几个问题，请帮忙提供解决方法
|
|
一篇能源类的文章，投稿后进入REVISE,虽然明白审稿人的意见，但是不是针对某个问题的，所以想不出如何来按照这种意见来修改，请有经验的同学帮忙指点二三。对有所启发的建议，会不吝啬地赠送金币。下面是审稿人的意见，肯定意见不写了，只写需修改的。 1、The original content of this paper is somehow limited, in terms of methodology first and also as it does not provide enough assumptions for discussions before giving conclusion which appears therefore a bit too rapid. 2、While commenting the outcomes of calculation and giving conclusion, prior to that step, provide information on 'benchmark figure' to facilitate the reading and understanding of the findings. 3、However, a paper on this topic would need to go much further into the subject matter and provide some original insights and analyses. In order to interest more audience beyond China and upgrade its scientific quality, the paper would need to more-convincingly: |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 关于写作 |
» 猜你喜欢
关于Filecode分析方法
已经有12人回复
-
澳大利亚 Murdoch University 全奖博士招生（3个名额）地质化工冶金领域
已经有38人回复
-
咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否
已经有11人回复
-
欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律
已经有28人回复
-
小木虫上这么多卖论文的，真有人买论文么？感觉没必要啊
已经有10人回复
-
阿姨
已经有4人回复
-
一作与独作在应聘高校教师时区别大吗
已经有4人回复
-
静等基金结果
已经有21人回复
-
FileCode能看出啥？
已经有28人回复
-
有时候，自然基金真的不能太认真 （我的申报经验）
已经有6人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 大修后一个月，变成Revise Moderate，中的机率大吗？
已经有11人回复
- revise and resubmit 时 修改的部分需要在论文中标注出来吗？
已经有6人回复
- revise之后多久提交修改稿比较合适啊
已经有10人回复
- [求助] sci论文revise, 其中一个拒稿的审稿人意见该如何回复？
已经有14人回复
- Fire safety journal 给了个major revise
已经有5人回复
- 会议论文返回意见“revise”
已经有41人回复
- 关于Revise and Resubmit as New
已经有6人回复
- 请问大家收到moderate revise后，多久给回复？
已经有5人回复
- "Revise - mandatory"
已经有39人回复
- moderate revise 之后2天变成Decision in Process接收的几率大吗
已经有74人回复
- Major revise 和 mandatory revise 那个更严重点？
已经有4人回复
- 关于revise 和 rewrite
已经有6人回复
- 论文返回major revise
已经有8人回复
- 期刊minor revise投稿后一直under review状态，求咨询信
已经有9人回复
googleuboy
木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 747 (博后)
- 金币: 3118.8
- 散金: 4149
- 红花: 36
- 帖子: 6906
- 在线: 760.6小时
- 虫号: 1810740
- 注册: 2012-05-11
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 结构工程
【答案】应助回帖
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
|
(1) Give more details about the methodology, how did you do it, what kind of raw materials is used? where you want to choose this kind of material, why did you choose this kind of methodology? The drawbacks of this methodology. To use this kind of methodology, which kind of assumptions you need to give, explain the assumptions effect on your results. What is the limitation of your study based on the method which you considered.. In the conclusion part, you may need to point out the limitations when you make a general conclusion (2) "A benchmark is something whose quality or quantity is known and which can therefore be used as a standard with which other things can be compared." (3) Based on the results in hand, perform more related analysis and go much deep to cuss your results. If neccesary, you could make a comparison between your results and other results from different countries, in order to convince the reviewers. |
2楼2012-10-18 14:22:38
