| 查看: 411 | 回复: 1 | |||
kellyhuizi新虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
论文在REVISE中的几个问题，请帮忙提供解决方法
|
|
一篇能源类的文章，投稿后进入REVISE,虽然明白审稿人的意见，但是不是针对某个问题的，所以想不出如何来按照这种意见来修改，请有经验的同学帮忙指点二三。对有所启发的建议，会不吝啬地赠送金币。下面是审稿人的意见，肯定意见不写了，只写需修改的。 1、The original content of this paper is somehow limited, in terms of methodology first and also as it does not provide enough assumptions for discussions before giving conclusion which appears therefore a bit too rapid. 2、While commenting the outcomes of calculation and giving conclusion, prior to that step, provide information on 'benchmark figure' to facilitate the reading and understanding of the findings. 3、However, a paper on this topic would need to go much further into the subject matter and provide some original insights and analyses. In order to interest more audience beyond China and upgrade its scientific quality, the paper would need to more-convincingly: |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 关于写作 |
» 猜你喜欢
职称评审没过，求安慰
已经有49人回复
-
26申博自荐
已经有3人回复
-
A期刊撤稿
已经有4人回复
-
垃圾破二本职称评审标准
已经有17人回复
-
投稿Elsevier的Neoplasia杂志，到最后选publishing options时页面空白，不能完成投稿
已经有22人回复
-
EST投稿状态问题
已经有7人回复
-
毕业后当辅导员了，天天各种学生超烦
已经有4人回复
-
三无产品还有机会吗
已经有6人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 大修后一个月，变成Revise Moderate，中的机率大吗？
已经有11人回复
- revise and resubmit 时 修改的部分需要在论文中标注出来吗？
已经有6人回复
- revise之后多久提交修改稿比较合适啊
已经有10人回复
- [求助] sci论文revise, 其中一个拒稿的审稿人意见该如何回复？
已经有14人回复
- Fire safety journal 给了个major revise
已经有5人回复
- 会议论文返回意见“revise”
已经有41人回复
- 关于Revise and Resubmit as New
已经有6人回复
- 请问大家收到moderate revise后，多久给回复？
已经有5人回复
- "Revise - mandatory"
已经有39人回复
- moderate revise 之后2天变成Decision in Process接收的几率大吗
已经有74人回复
- Major revise 和 mandatory revise 那个更严重点？
已经有4人回复
- 关于revise 和 rewrite
已经有6人回复
- 论文返回major revise
已经有8人回复
- 期刊minor revise投稿后一直under review状态，求咨询信
已经有9人回复
googleuboy
木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 747 (博后)
- 金币: 3118.8
- 散金: 4149
- 红花: 36
- 帖子: 6906
- 在线: 760.6小时
- 虫号: 1810740
- 注册: 2012-05-11
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 结构工程
【答案】应助回帖
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
|
(1) Give more details about the methodology, how did you do it, what kind of raw materials is used? where you want to choose this kind of material, why did you choose this kind of methodology? The drawbacks of this methodology. To use this kind of methodology, which kind of assumptions you need to give, explain the assumptions effect on your results. What is the limitation of your study based on the method which you considered.. In the conclusion part, you may need to point out the limitations when you make a general conclusion (2) "A benchmark is something whose quality or quantity is known and which can therefore be used as a standard with which other things can be compared." (3) Based on the results in hand, perform more related analysis and go much deep to cuss your results. If neccesary, you could make a comparison between your results and other results from different countries, in order to convince the reviewers. |
2楼2012-10-18 14:22:38