24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

sjzhang156

银虫 (著名写手)

应助: 77 (初中生)
金币: 2078.3
帖子: 1033
在线: 196.8小时
虫号: 995395

[交流] 这样的情况还有大修的必要吗

The manuscript has been reviewed by three experts. Their recommendations are highly divergent. Reviewers #1 recommends rejection of the manuscript. Reviewers #3 is also highly critical, but this reviewer recommends that the manuscript may possibly be considered for publication after a major revision. In contrast, Reviewers #2 is positive. This reviewer recommends acceptance of the manuscript.

The comments of Reviewers #1 and - to a lesser extent - Reviewers #3 seem to disqualify the manuscript. However, because of the positive comments of the latter two reviewers, the authors deserve a chance to respond and to improve their manuscript in line with the recommendations of the reviewers. The authors should carefully address all issues raised by the reviewers and they should improve the manuscript in line with the recommendations of the reviewers. If necessary, they should perform additional experiments.
文章已经重投过了，有一个审稿人从始至终否定，感觉一点看不到文章的优点，所有的都是缺点，我觉得是常识的东西他觉得都是错的，我觉得自己是无法说服他了，准备全部以反驳的形式回复了，录不录取不管了，太累了。现在纠结的时要不要和编辑说说无法按照这个审稿人的意见修改，编辑既然不顾他的反对让我修改还会再给他审吗？我估计编辑给我大修是因为来回折腾我半年了，我本来新的东西都成了旧的了。遇到固执又有偏见的审稿人真是伤不起。

回复此楼