| 查看: 3497 | 回复: 14 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
JPBA 投稿被拒，贴出拒稿信，求指点 已有5人参与
|
|||
|
Dear Dr. Zhu, I regret to inform you that, after consideration of our reviewers' comments on your paper (with which I fully agree), I'm unable to accept it for publication. For your guidance, I append the reviewers' comments below. Please note that a great many more papers are submitted to JPBA than we can possibly publish. The acceptance rate for papers is about 25% and our decision is not a reflection of the quality of your research but rather of our stringent requirements. The Editors hope that you do understand the above decision, and we appreciate your continued interest in the Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. We wish you every success when you submit the paper elsewhere. Yours sincerely, Sándor Görög Editor Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: This paper is about Identification of major compounds in rat bile, plasma and urine after oral administration of Radix Scutellariae extract by ultra-fast liquid chromatography coupled to ion trap time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Although these observation are interesting, they are rather limited and do not advance our knowledge of the subject sufficiently to warrant publication in JPBA. 1. It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. 2. The innovation of this manuscript is weak and the content of experiments is not plentiful. 3. The Fig.4 and Fig.4 are not clearly expressed, and the Fig.5 should be deleted. It will be nice if you can add the schematic diagram of the cracking. Based on what was described above this manuscript is not suitable for publication in the journal of JPBA. We suggest that the authors try submitting their findings to other journals. Reviewer #2: I do not recommend the publication of this manuscript due mainly to the lack of scientific novelty and for neglecting the comparison of the authors' method and results with those in the literature. The Guide for Authors of JPBA contains the following restriction: "In determining the suitability of submitted articles for publication, particular scrutiny will be placed on the degree of novelty and significance of the research and the extent to which it adds to existing knowledge in pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis. In all submissions to the journal, authors must address the question of how their proposed methodology compares with previously reported methods." The authors have missed to make reference to closely related papers such as Ling Tong, Meixu Wan, Lihua Zhang, Yonghong Zhu, He Sun, Kaishun Bi, Simultaneous determination of baicalin, wogonoside, baicalein, wogonin, oroxylin A and chrysin of Radix scutellariae extract in rat plasma by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry, Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis (2012) (from the same university!!!) and Chung, H.J., Lim, S., Kim, I.S., Bu, Y., Kim, H., Kim, D.-H., Yoo, H.H., Simultaneous determination of baicalein, baicalin, wogonin, and wogonoside in rat plasma by LC-MS/MS for studying the pharmacokinetics of the standardized extract of scutellariae radix, Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society, 33 (2012) 177-182. Reference has been made to [23] but real comparison was not made. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有7人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
明天应该可查了！？
已经有5人回复
-
如果此刻你正在为国基感到焦虑，不妨来听听这首《基金之外》
已经有7人回复
-
没有任何消息-是不是就凉了
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
人气不行了
已经有10人回复
-
我面上完蛋了
已经有10人回复
-
能否退出参与的面上项目解除限项
已经有24人回复
-
filecode，4个jtjc了
已经有17人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 语言问题被拒两次投稿信怎么写
已经有16人回复
- 投了一篇JPBA，三个月给拒了，编辑的拒信
已经有43人回复
- 文章被拒，但想写申诉信，如何写？
已经有21人回复
- 被拒了，想申诉呢，大家帮忙看看拒稿信，还有没有可能？
已经有13人回复
- 有没有虫友被拒稿后写过申诉信？急需指点一下！
已经有5人回复
- JPBA 修稿，要求改图片格式，求助各位指点
已经有3人回复
- 拒稿信还需要回复吗？
已经有11人回复
- 发BB求助一份拒稿信
已经有7人回复
- 文章被拒，求助被拒信中一段话的意思
已经有12人回复
- 大家帮忙看下这封拒稿信是什么意思，还能继续投这个期刊吗？先谢谢各位了。
已经有3人回复
- 看完拒稿信后的心情
已经有37人回复
- 文章被拒，请大家帮我看看拒稿信，我应该怎么办？
已经有31人回复
- 稿件被拒，打算回信力争
已经有11人回复
独步青云
新虫 (职业作家)
术中小生
- 应助: 894 (博后)
- 金币: 2993.1
- 散金: 3834
- 红花: 16
- 帖子: 3587
- 在线: 241.8小时
- 虫号: 339818
- 注册: 2007-04-07
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 中药质量评价
4楼2012-09-06 15:04:30
独步青云
新虫 (职业作家)
术中小生
- 应助: 894 (博后)
- 金币: 2993.1
- 散金: 3834
- 红花: 16
- 帖子: 3587
- 在线: 241.8小时
- 虫号: 339818
- 注册: 2007-04-07
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 中药质量评价
2楼2012-09-02 12:46:48
3楼2012-09-06 13:26:40
5楼2012-09-07 19:56:03
