24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3506  |  回复: 14

letdd

新虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] JPBA 投稿被拒,贴出拒稿信,求指点 已有5人参与

Dear Dr. Zhu,

I regret to inform you that, after consideration of our reviewers' comments on your paper (with which I fully agree), I'm unable to accept it for publication.

For your guidance, I append the reviewers' comments below.

Please note that a great many more papers are submitted to JPBA than we can possibly publish. The acceptance rate for papers is about 25% and our decision is not a reflection of the quality of your research but rather of our stringent requirements.

The Editors hope that you do understand the above decision, and we appreciate your continued interest in the Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis.

Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. We wish you every success when you submit the paper elsewhere.

Yours sincerely,

Sándor Görög
Editor
Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis

Reviewers' comments:


Reviewer #1: This paper is about Identification of major compounds in rat bile, plasma and urine after oral administration of Radix Scutellariae extract by ultra-fast liquid chromatography coupled to ion trap time-of-flight mass spectrometry.
Although these observation are interesting, they are rather limited and do not advance our knowledge of the subject sufficiently to warrant publication in JPBA.
1.        It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure.
2.        The innovation of this manuscript is weak and the content of experiments is not plentiful.
3.        The Fig.4 and Fig.4 are not clearly expressed, and the Fig.5 should be deleted. It will be nice if you can add the schematic diagram of the cracking.
Based on what was described above this manuscript is not suitable for publication in the journal of JPBA. We suggest that the authors try submitting their findings to other journals.




Reviewer #2: I do not recommend the publication of this manuscript due mainly to the lack of scientific novelty and for neglecting the comparison of the authors' method and results with those in the literature. The Guide for Authors of JPBA contains the following restriction: "In determining the suitability of submitted articles for publication, particular scrutiny will be placed on the degree of novelty and significance of the research and the extent to which it adds to existing knowledge in pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis. In all submissions to the journal, authors must address the question of how their proposed methodology compares with previously reported methods."
The authors have missed to make reference to closely related papers such as
Ling Tong, Meixu Wan, Lihua Zhang, Yonghong Zhu, He Sun, Kaishun Bi,  Simultaneous determination of baicalin, wogonoside, baicalein, wogonin, oroxylin A and chrysin of Radix scutellariae extract in rat plasma by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry, Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis (2012) (from the same university!!!) and
Chung, H.J., Lim, S., Kim, I.S., Bu, Y., Kim, H., Kim, D.-H., Yoo, H.H., Simultaneous determination of baicalein, baicalin, wogonin, and wogonoside in rat plasma by LC-MS/MS for studying the pharmacokinetics of the standardized extract of scutellariae radix, Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society,  33 (2012) 177-182.
Reference has been made to [23] but real comparison was not made.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

独步青云

新虫 (职业作家)

术中小生


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
我仔细看了审稿意见。
首先不要再投JPBA了,通过几点老鼠,利用LC/MS进行简单地鉴定入血成分,自去年JPBA就不收了。随着IF的增长,其在代谢方面要求显著提高。
审稿人认为你的方法没有什么特色,换句话说你的发现没有什么闪光点。另外一定得和已报道文献进行比对,说明你方法的先进性。任何文章只报道自己东西,没有和先前文献对比的话,肯定是一短板。尤其遇到做过相关研究的审稿人,他认变你没有好好看文献。
2楼2012-09-02 12:46:48
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

letdd

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by 独步青云 at 2012-09-02 12:46:48
我仔细看了审稿意见。
首先不要再投JPBA了,通过几点老鼠,利用LC/MS进行简单地鉴定入血成分,自去年JPBA就不收了。随着IF的增长,其在代谢方面要求显著提高。
审稿人认为你的方法没有什么特色,换句话说你的发现 ...

可能标题有误导,我做的代谢产物结构鉴定的。鉴定了20种代谢产物。和10种入血成分。
3楼2012-09-06 13:26:40
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

独步青云

新虫 (职业作家)

术中小生


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by letdd at 2012-09-06 13:26:40
可能标题有误导,我做的代谢产物结构鉴定的。鉴定了20种代谢产物。和10种入血成分。...

我没有被误解。像黄芩做这以多,你鉴定的结果也没有多大的突破。如果我是审稿人也会拒这方面的文章。是文章的要求高了,没有办法。换在两年前还是可以的。
4楼2012-09-06 15:04:30
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

letdd

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by 独步青云 at 2012-09-06 15:04:30
我没有被误解。像黄芩做这以多,你鉴定的结果也没有多大的突破。如果我是审稿人也会拒这方面的文章。是文章的要求高了,没有办法。换在两年前还是可以的。...

这样哦。哎。。那我只能换杂志了,你觉得Biomedical chromatography 1.9有可能接受吗?
5楼2012-09-07 19:56:03
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

独步青云

新虫 (职业作家)

术中小生


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
5楼: Originally posted by letdd at 2012-09-07 19:56:03
这样哦。哎。。那我只能换杂志了,你觉得Biomedical chromatography 1.9有可能接受吗?...

说实话,我不知道你文章的表达水平如何。如果只是说这些结果的话,投BMC机率会大些,但也不敢保证。这个原来觉得很一般的杂志好像对于代谢产物鉴定没有创新的也不收,要求有PK数据。
6楼2012-09-07 21:02:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

letdd

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
6楼: Originally posted by 独步青云 at 2012-09-07 21:02:36
说实话,我不知道你文章的表达水平如何。如果只是说这些结果的话,投BMC机率会大些,但也不敢保证。这个原来觉得很一般的杂志好像对于代谢产物鉴定没有创新的也不收,要求有PK数据。...

哦多谢指导
7楼2012-09-07 21:11:10
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

rockinuk

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
建议楼主好好针对那些专家的意见改改稿~~
若不改稿~~就改投其他地方吧~~
但会不会遇到类似情况~~很难说~~
我的爱徒~再撑一下~你快拿到清华全校优秀硕士论文了~
8楼2012-09-07 23:02:45
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

liuqingwang

金虫 (小有名气)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
楼主,你的投稿一审用了多久?我选的也是这个编辑,不知道靠谱不
9楼2012-10-26 09:43:06
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

小兵虾米

金虫 (正式写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
9楼: Originally posted by liuqingwang at 2012-10-26 09:43:06
楼主,你的投稿一审用了多久?我选的也是这个编辑,不知道靠谱不

阁下的JPBA文章最后接受了没呢?一审用了多久啊
努力奋斗的宝妈
10楼2013-08-05 11:25:55
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 letdd 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 投票:  有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的? +16 爱看书的可乐 2026-08-26 18/900 2026-08-28 05:13 by winsaint
[基金申请] 基金系统什么内容也没有 30+3 winsaint 2026-08-27 6/300 2026-08-28 01:46 by alongwaytogo
[硕博家园] 售SCI一区文章,我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急 +3 XLGfUIdOmEAO 2026-08-27 3/150 2026-08-28 00:49 by 3RAFyYXYSwGS
[基金申请] 哪位高人中了,把查询到的截图贴出来让我看看,让我长长见识 +5 yuleib84 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-28 00:02 by yudaoqian88
[教师之家] 售SCI文章,我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +3 XLGfUIdOmEAO 2026-08-27 4/200 2026-08-27 22:26 by 3RAFyYXYSwGS
[基金申请] 申请删除本帖 +6 lyz123lyz 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-27 17:31 by 宁静致远sy
[基金申请] 基金未中,这种答复是模板吗? +5 zhaosm1982 2026-08-27 6/300 2026-08-27 16:00 by lfy8008
[基金申请] 看板上这么多中的,有点像50人群里49个人都是骗子的那种感觉…… +5 a089 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-27 14:05 by jonewore
[文学芳草园] 梦想 +3 myrtle 2026-08-26 3/150 2026-08-27 10:01 by angelyueyi
[硕博家园] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +3 LIbGuocjEEYw 2026-08-26 4/200 2026-08-27 02:01 by Ie9AyIAvGbvs
[基金申请] 我不理解! +15 Edward_pc 2026-08-26 23/1150 2026-08-26 20:34 by zzuzxg
[基金申请] 怎么查啊 +5 huang1991js 2026-08-26 5/250 2026-08-26 16:09 by Equinoxhua
[基金申请] 项目信息和经费信息在系统里都可以看到了 +6 wittyboy 2026-08-26 14/700 2026-08-26 10:55 by wittyboy
[基金申请] 国合可查了 +3 paperzjh 2026-08-26 3/150 2026-08-26 10:41 by LemmonTr
[基金申请] 国合现在查不到了吗? +10 chengyan1220 2026-08-24 20/1000 2026-08-26 08:57 by peasantsprig
[基金申请] 明天应该可查了!? +6 chengyan1220 2026-08-23 6/300 2026-08-25 19:45 by zfd97
[基金申请] 如果此刻你正在为国基感到焦虑,不妨来听听这首《基金之外》 +8 scalable 2026-08-24 8/400 2026-08-25 12:52 by jnhyjjm
[基金申请] 建议基金发布提前给出明确的时间点 +13 kulium 2026-08-21 16/800 2026-08-24 16:27 by superceng
[教师之家] 跳槽后在研项目怎么办? +5 简单化xn 2026-08-22 10/500 2026-08-23 12:38 by 简单化xn
[基金申请] 应该是下周三26日公布了吧? +4 哈哈蛤? 2026-08-21 4/200 2026-08-21 10:58 by Vivilian
信息提示
请填处理意见