| ²é¿´: 1445 | »Ø¸´: 7 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | |||
zhaorongman½ð³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[ÇóÖú]
ÓйØÀÏÍâÆÀÉóר¼ÒµÄÒâ¼û¡£
|
||
|
Ö÷±à¸øµÄÒâ¼û£º However since the reviewers do find some merit in the paper, I would be willing to reconsider if you wish to undertake major revisions and re-submit, addressing the referees' concerns. Please note that resubmitting your manuscript does not guarantee eventual acceptance, and that your resubmission will be subject to re-review before a decision is rendered. You will be unable to make your revisions on the originally submitted version of your manuscript. Instead, revise your manuscript using a word processing program and save it on your computer. Once you have revised your manuscript, go to http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/lsta and login to your Author Centre. Click on "Manuscripts with Decisions," and then click on "Create a Resubmission" located next to the manuscript number. Then, follow the steps for resubmitting your manuscript. Because we are trying to facilitate timely publication of manuscripts submitted to Communications in Statistics ¨C Theory and Methods, your revised manuscript should be uploaded as soon as possible. If it is not possible for you to submit your revision within a reasonable amount of time, we will consider your paper as a new submission. I look forward to a resubmission Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author: ÆÀÔÄר¼ÒµÄÒâ¼û£º Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author ×ܹ²ÌáÁË8ÌõÒâ¼û£¬Ã»ÓÐÖ±½Ó˵¾Ü¾øµÄ»°¡£ Reviewer: 2 ˵µÄÕâ¸öÊÇʲôÒâ˼°¡£ºI would therefore recommend ¡°rejection of this paper with an encouragement to revise¡±. È»ºóºóÃæ¸øÎҺܶàÒâ¼û¡£ ÂÛÎÄstatusÊÇ£º Çë´ó¼Ò¿´¿´£¬ÎÒ²»ÊǺÜÃ÷°×£¬Ð»Ð»¸÷λµÄ°ïÖú¡£ [ Last edited by zhaorongman on 2012-8-19 at 23:14 ] |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸±±¾©»¯¹¤´óѧ070300 ѧ˶336Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
¿¼Ñе÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
ÄÜÔ´²ÄÁÏ»¯Ñ§¿ÎÌâ×éÕÐÊÕ˶ʿÑо¿Éú8-10Ãû
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
318Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
285Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
306Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
354Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
303Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
»·¾³Ñ§Ë¶288Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
ÆÀÉó×Ô¿ÆÃæÉÏÏîÄ¿µÄ¼¸µãÌå»á
ÒѾÓÐ101È˻ظ´
ÀÏÍâר¼Ò¸øµÄÉó¸åÒâ¼û£¬ÓÐЩµØ·½¿´²»¶®£¬Íü¸ßÊÖÖ¸½Ì£¬Ð»Ð»Å¶
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
ר¼ÒµÄÆÀÉóÒâ¼û£¬Çë´ó¼Òѧϰѧϰ£¡
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
Èç¹ûÕæµÄÓÐCSCµÄÀÏʦÀ´Ð¡Ä¾³æÇ±Ë®µÄ»°£¬ÇëÇóÄú¹Ø×¢´ËÌù²¢ÄܸøÓèÖ¸µã
ÒѾÓÐ37È˻ظ´
ÀÕ¸öÈ¥µÄ£¬ÏëÂîÈËÁË£¬Ê¡ÀïµÄ²©Ê¿ºó»ù½ð¾ÓÈ»´í¹ýÈ¥ÁË£¬Ã»¿´¼û֪ͨ
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
¡¾½»Á÷ÌÖÂÛ¡¿½¨Òé´ó¼Ò²éÒ»ÏÂCSC¼ȡÕßµÄÎÄÕ£¡
ÒѾÓÐ68È˻ظ´

zhaorongman
½ð³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1284.7
- É¢½ð: 13
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 73
- ÔÚÏß: 44Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1019606
- ×¢²á: 2010-05-16
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¹¤Òµ¹¤³ÌÓë¹ÜÀí
zhaorongman: »ØÌûÖö¥ 2012-08-21 10:22:20
|
I regret to inform you that the reviewers have raised serious concerns, and therefore your paper cannot be accepted for publication in Communications in Statistics ¨C Theory and Methods. However since the reviewers do find some merit in the paper, I would be willing to reconsider if you wish to undertake major revisions and re-submit, addressing the referees' concerns. Please note that resubmitting your manuscript does not guarantee eventual acceptance, and that your resubmission will be subject to re-review before a decision is rendered. ÕâÊÇÖ÷±à¸øµÄÒâ¼û |

7Â¥2012-08-20 17:14:18
zhychen2008
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 70 (³õÖÐÉú)
- ¹ó±ö: 2.155
- ½ð±Ò: 24297
- É¢½ð: 763
- ºì»¨: 24
- ɳ·¢: 3
- Ìû×Ó: 2805
- ÔÚÏß: 762.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 338919
- ×¢²á: 2007-04-05
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Ò©¼Áѧ

2Â¥2012-08-19 23:59:44
3Â¥2012-08-20 00:04:28
zhouwenhui2000
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- SEPI: 1
- Ó¦Öú: 309 (´óѧÉú)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.321
- ½ð±Ò: 8618.4
- É¢½ð: 2433
- ºì»¨: 25
- Ìû×Ó: 2767
- ÔÚÏß: 394Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 67222
- ×¢²á: 2005-05-05
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: °ëµ¼Ìå²ÄÁÏ
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
| ÆäʵÈ˼ҸøÄãµÄÒâ¼û¾ÍÊÇ´óÐÞÖØÍ¶¡£½¨Ò黹Êǰ´ÕÕר¼ÒºÍ±à¼²¿µÄÒâ¼ûÐÞ¸ÄÖØÍ¶~ |
» ±¾ÌûÒÑ»ñµÃµÄºì»¨£¨×îÐÂ10¶ä£©

4Â¥2012-08-20 08:16:45













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
zhaorongman