24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (4574)
>导师招生 (386)
>虫友互识 (255)
>休闲灌水 (242)
>文献求助 (190)
>招聘信息布告栏 (155)
>硕博家园 (130)
>论文道贺祈福 (124)
>考博 (77)
>考研 (75)
>基金申请 (59)
>博后之家 (58)
>找工作 (58)
>教师之家 (37)
>公派出国 (32)
>论文投稿 (32)

返回列表

本帖产生 1 个海博EPI ，点击这里进行查看

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

JunJr

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

海博EPI : 16
应助: 265 (大学生)
贵宾: 0.308
金币: 6397.4
散金: 1030
红花: 114
帖子: 2118
在线: 1757.9小时
虫号: 1081442
注册: 2010-08-25
性别: GG
专业: 生物信息学

[交流] Nature上发表的美国NIH关于美国生命学科就业情况的统计。已有12人参与

嫌麻烦的直接看如下的图。
2010年，被聘为faculty（Assistant Prof.,助理教授）的峰值在35～60岁之间，中值看起来在45岁左右。
而首次拿到NIH经费的峰值年龄在40～55之间。

现在这年头，即使是在美国能做到Faculty这样的牛人，那从普遍意义上来说也得做博士后一直做到45岁才能刚开始成为PI。

来源：
http://www.nature.com/news/a-wor ... 52?nc=1341065864213

原文：
A workforce out of balance
Too many biomedical PhDs and too few minorities are a demographic dilemma for the NIH.
Meredith Wadman
19 June 2012

The US biomedical workforce has a glut of young researchers but a dearth of some minority groups, members of which are struggling to establish themselves in the field. The double-barrelled problem is laid out in detail in a pair of reports presented to the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) in Bethesda, Maryland, on 14 June.

NIH leaders have long worried about a steep increase in the number of biomedical PhDs, a consequence of the doubling of the NIH budget from 1998 to 2003. Now that boom is making it increasingly difficult for young scientists to launch academic careers (see ‘Swelling ranks’).

Expand
SOURCE: NSF; NIH; ASSOC. AM. MED. COLL.
“This is dysfunctional and it’s not sustainable in the long term,” says Shirley Tilghman, president of Princeton University in New Jersey and a co-chair of the working group that authored a report on structural problems in the workforce. It calls for several measures to address the oversupply of PhDs, including a six-year cap on the number of years that a graduate student can be supported by NIH funds and an increase in the proportion of students on career-oriented training grants rather than on research grants.

A second report, focusing on diversity, was spurred by a study published in Science last year, which found that after factors such as education and publication record are controlled for, black applicants are 10% less likely than white applicants to win NIH research funding (D. K. Ginther et al. Science 333, 1015–1019; 2011).

Expand
SOURCE: 2010 US CENSUS BUREAU REPORT; NIH
The diversity report confirms that minority applicants have significantly reduced success rates for grant applications (see ‘Uneven playing field’). Confronted with data such as these, “there are a number of scientists of colour who feel, at the end of the day, ‘What’s the point?’” says Reed Tuckson, vice-president and chief of medical affairs at the health-insurance firm United Health Group in Minnetonka, Minnesota, and one of three co-chairs of the diversity working group. That sentiment “really, really bothers me”, he adds. “We have got to turn [that] around.”

The report recommends, among other things, that the NIH launch a “bold”, well-funded competitive grant process to build infrastructure at institutions with a record of producing minority scientists, and that it launch an experiment to make applicants’ identities and institutions anonymous in the review process.

[ Last edited by JunJr on 2012-7-11 at 08:04 ]

回复此楼