| 查看: 664 | 回复: 2 | ||
djjianglei金虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
materials &design 审稿意见求助
|
|
投materials & design，under review 20多天后，给了Revise. The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript. Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments. If you are submitting a revised manuscript, please also: a) outline each change made (point by point) as raised in the reviewer comments AND/OR b) provide a suitable rebuttal to each reviewer comment not addressed To submit your revision, please do the following: 1. Go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/jmad/ 2. Enter your login details 3. Click [Author Login] This takes you to the Author Main Menu. 4. Click [Submissions Needing Revision] When submitting your revised manuscript, please ensure that you upload the source files (e.g. Word). Uploading only a PDF file at this stage will create delays should your manuscript be finally accepted for publication. If your revised submission does not include the source files, we will contact you to request them. I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Yours sincerely, K.L. Edwards Editor in Chief Materials and Design Reviewers' comments: there are a lot of drawbacks in the text and it is recommended that the manuscript be revised (major) before further consideration (English professional may help). Comments: - The long confusing sentences in all parts of the manuscript (for example the first and last sentence in abstract; the first two sentences in introduction and so on ......). - Experimental section: the dimensions of specimens were not clearly stated. The detail experiments and test must be stated (for example mechanical tests and weight loss). - Results and discussion: The long confusing sentences (for example the first sentence in mechanical properties in page ** . There are many others ). - There is no page numbers. - There is no Figure numbers. ********************** 审稿意见没有怎么提及文章内容的问题，主要是语言方面，这是不是说明英语太差，审稿人直接没有仔细看文章内容，属于最初的语言关没有通过，重新修改后还有机会么？另外本文是混凝土耐久性方面的文章，不知道主题合适不，还望高人指点！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
想换工作。大多数高校都是 评职称时 认可5年内在原单位取得的成果吗？
已经有9人回复
-
求个博导看看
已经有16人回复
-
上海工程技术大学张培磊教授团队招收博士生
已经有4人回复
-
上海工程技术大学【激光智能制造】课题组招收硕士
已经有5人回复
-
求助院士们，这个如何合成呀
已经有4人回复
-
临港实验室与上科大联培博士招生1名
已经有9人回复
-
需要合成515-64-0，50g，能接单的留言
已经有4人回复
-
自荐读博
已经有4人回复
-
写了一篇“相变储能技术在冷库中应用”的论文，论文内容以实验为主，投什么期刊合适？
已经有6人回复
-
带资进组求博导收留
已经有10人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- Materials Design审稿周期多长？有投过的吗
已经有9人回复
- 求助审稿意见里的一句话是什么意思？
已经有6人回复
- materials and design审稿人同意，编辑拒稿概率多大？
已经有8人回复
- 审稿意见求助，关于ELISA法，谢谢！
已经有6人回复
- 大家帮我分析一下material and design的审稿意见，录用几率大不？
已经有24人回复
- 求助--培养基优化方面审稿意见回复
已经有6人回复
- 【求助】审稿意见求助
已经有9人回复
- Materials and Design 审稿人没意见 编辑让加括号 至今With Editor
已经有7人回复
- 求助：Materials Letters怎么样？审稿周期长吗？
已经有3人回复
- 求助material & design杂志审稿问题
已经有16人回复
caiwangtan
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 36 (小学生)
- 金币: 1669.2
- 散金: 19
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 384
- 在线: 254.3小时
- 虫号: 888631
- 注册: 2009-10-30
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 金属基复合材料
2楼2012-05-29 12:04:42
yanwuliaorao
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 1462 (讲师)
- 贵宾: 0.088
- 金币: 15622.2
- 散金: 1899
- 红花: 54
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 15373
- 在线: 1011.7小时
- 虫号: 1749011
- 注册: 2012-04-10
- 专业: 计算机应用技术
3楼2012-05-29 12:09:14