| 查看: 845 | 回复: 2 | ||
djjianglei金虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
materials &design 审稿意见求助
|
|
投materials & design，under review 20多天后，给了Revise. The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript. Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments. If you are submitting a revised manuscript, please also: a) outline each change made (point by point) as raised in the reviewer comments AND/OR b) provide a suitable rebuttal to each reviewer comment not addressed To submit your revision, please do the following: 1. Go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/jmad/ 2. Enter your login details 3. Click [Author Login] This takes you to the Author Main Menu. 4. Click [Submissions Needing Revision] When submitting your revised manuscript, please ensure that you upload the source files (e.g. Word). Uploading only a PDF file at this stage will create delays should your manuscript be finally accepted for publication. If your revised submission does not include the source files, we will contact you to request them. I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Yours sincerely, K.L. Edwards Editor in Chief Materials and Design Reviewers' comments: there are a lot of drawbacks in the text and it is recommended that the manuscript be revised (major) before further consideration (English professional may help). Comments: - The long confusing sentences in all parts of the manuscript (for example the first and last sentence in abstract; the first two sentences in introduction and so on ......). - Experimental section: the dimensions of specimens were not clearly stated. The detail experiments and test must be stated (for example mechanical tests and weight loss). - Results and discussion: The long confusing sentences (for example the first sentence in mechanical properties in page ** . There are many others ). - There is no page numbers. - There is no Figure numbers. ********************** 审稿意见没有怎么提及文章内容的问题，主要是语言方面，这是不是说明英语太差，审稿人直接没有仔细看文章内容，属于最初的语言关没有通过，重新修改后还有机会么？另外本文是混凝土耐久性方面的文章，不知道主题合适不，还望高人指点！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
什么时候开奖？
已经有4人回复
-
咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否
已经有27人回复
-
为什么余额宝的年化利率越来越低？主要原因有哪些？
已经有3人回复
-
2027广东省杰青
已经有9人回复
-
朋友圈看到的
已经有5人回复
-
欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律
已经有110人回复
-
明天放榜？
已经有5人回复
-
时间戳变了，能看出什么问题？
已经有11人回复
-
重要消息，中午系统在维护
已经有10人回复
-
投稿咨询
已经有6人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- Materials Design审稿周期多长？有投过的吗
已经有9人回复
- 求助审稿意见里的一句话是什么意思？
已经有6人回复
- materials and design审稿人同意，编辑拒稿概率多大？
已经有8人回复
- 审稿意见求助，关于ELISA法，谢谢！
已经有6人回复
- 大家帮我分析一下material and design的审稿意见，录用几率大不？
已经有24人回复
- 求助--培养基优化方面审稿意见回复
已经有6人回复
- 【求助】审稿意见求助
已经有9人回复
- Materials and Design 审稿人没意见 编辑让加括号 至今With Editor
已经有7人回复
- 求助：Materials Letters怎么样？审稿周期长吗？
已经有3人回复
- 求助material & design杂志审稿问题
已经有16人回复
caiwangtan
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 36 (小学生)
- 金币: 1669.2
- 散金: 19
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 384
- 在线: 254.3小时
- 虫号: 888631
- 注册: 2009-10-30
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 金属基复合材料
2楼2012-05-29 12:04:42
yanwuliaorao
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 1462 (讲师)
- 贵宾: 0.088
- 金币: 15622.2
- 散金: 1899
- 红花: 54
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 15373
- 在线: 1011.7小时
- 虫号: 1749011
- 注册: 2012-04-10
- 专业: 计算机应用技术
3楼2012-05-29 12:09:14
