| 查看: 702 | 回复: 2 | ||
djjianglei金虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
materials &design 审稿意见求助
|
|
投materials & design，under review 20多天后，给了Revise. The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript. Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments. If you are submitting a revised manuscript, please also: a) outline each change made (point by point) as raised in the reviewer comments AND/OR b) provide a suitable rebuttal to each reviewer comment not addressed To submit your revision, please do the following: 1. Go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/jmad/ 2. Enter your login details 3. Click [Author Login] This takes you to the Author Main Menu. 4. Click [Submissions Needing Revision] When submitting your revised manuscript, please ensure that you upload the source files (e.g. Word). Uploading only a PDF file at this stage will create delays should your manuscript be finally accepted for publication. If your revised submission does not include the source files, we will contact you to request them. I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Yours sincerely, K.L. Edwards Editor in Chief Materials and Design Reviewers' comments: there are a lot of drawbacks in the text and it is recommended that the manuscript be revised (major) before further consideration (English professional may help). Comments: - The long confusing sentences in all parts of the manuscript (for example the first and last sentence in abstract; the first two sentences in introduction and so on ......). - Experimental section: the dimensions of specimens were not clearly stated. The detail experiments and test must be stated (for example mechanical tests and weight loss). - Results and discussion: The long confusing sentences (for example the first sentence in mechanical properties in page ** . There are many others ). - There is no page numbers. - There is no Figure numbers. ********************** 审稿意见没有怎么提及文章内容的问题，主要是语言方面，这是不是说明英语太差，审稿人直接没有仔细看文章内容，属于最初的语言关没有通过，重新修改后还有机会么？另外本文是混凝土耐久性方面的文章，不知道主题合适不，还望高人指点！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
南昌大学材料专硕311分求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
316求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
346求调剂[0856]
已经有7人回复
-
一志愿山大07化学 332分 四六级已过 本科山东双非 求调剂！
已经有3人回复
-
310求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
机械专硕299求调剂至材料
已经有4人回复
-
070300化学319求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
08工科 320总分 求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
一志愿天津大学化学工艺专业（081702）315分求调剂
已经有12人回复
-
307求调剂
已经有3人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- Materials Design审稿周期多长？有投过的吗
已经有9人回复
- 求助审稿意见里的一句话是什么意思？
已经有6人回复
- materials and design审稿人同意，编辑拒稿概率多大？
已经有8人回复
- 审稿意见求助，关于ELISA法，谢谢！
已经有6人回复
- 大家帮我分析一下material and design的审稿意见，录用几率大不？
已经有24人回复
- 求助--培养基优化方面审稿意见回复
已经有6人回复
- 【求助】审稿意见求助
已经有9人回复
- Materials and Design 审稿人没意见 编辑让加括号 至今With Editor
已经有7人回复
- 求助：Materials Letters怎么样？审稿周期长吗？
已经有3人回复
- 求助material & design杂志审稿问题
已经有16人回复
caiwangtan
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 36 (小学生)
- 金币: 1669.2
- 散金: 19
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 384
- 在线: 254.3小时
- 虫号: 888631
- 注册: 2009-10-30
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 金属基复合材料
2楼2012-05-29 12:04:42
yanwuliaorao
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 1462 (讲师)
- 贵宾: 0.088
- 金币: 15622.2
- 散金: 1899
- 红花: 54
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 15373
- 在线: 1011.7小时
- 虫号: 1749011
- 注册: 2012-04-10
- 专业: 计算机应用技术
3楼2012-05-29 12:09:14
