| 查看: 990 | 回复: 2 | |||
[交流]
第一篇论文投JMS被拒后，相同模型内容不同的文章（第一篇的延续工作）再投JMS有戏么 已有2人参与
|
|
内容较长，请各位海涵！ 第一篇论文投JMS被拒后，编辑给出的拒稿信： I have received two reports on this manuscript from well-established reviewers. I have read their comments and find that they raise some very valid concerns. On one hand, it appears that not all the important parameters are accounted for in the cost estimation, and on the other hand, some flaws in the algorithms cast some doubts on the actual result. I admit that the prediction of performance and cost of Membrane systems is a difficult exercise, but in the present case, I think this submission cannot be published as a research paper for the reasons mentioned here above. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have questions on this file. 两个审稿人的部分意见 Reviewer #1: The article has two main items namely predicting/calculation performance of RO systems and cost of the produced water. The cost calculations have no added value. Main reason is that the input is far from complete and far from correct e.g. pre-treatment cost are not included and the cost of membrane elements are two times higher than actual cost. The performance predictions/calculations with the developed model suggest that the existing models used by e.g. Dow, Hydranautics and Toray don't exists or are inferior. This part could have given an added value if results obtained with the model were compared with the results of calculations done with the projection programs of the abovementioned companies. Results of an existing plant (source: publication) are compared with model calculations and concluded that the model is O.K. However it is not clear what exactly the input data were in this reference.And the comparison is marginally done. Recommend to rewriting the article and compare results obtained from the model and projection programs in detail for several situations. If the model fits it might be useful to publish and to making the program fully available for the desalination society. This has an added value since it is unknow how the projection programs do the calculations. Reviewer #2: This paper may be reviewed after incorporating following major revisions, some comments are listed as follow: 1. A structural diagram of membrane module should be given, which can describe the module model and symbols in Eqs. (1)-(4). 。。。中间的意见基本上都是一些不大的错误 15. As far as I know, the outer approximation algorithm can solve the MINLP problem, which just likes the following form: Min cy + f(x) s.t. , c is constant where the binary variable y is linear, it is just as the statement in line 49 on page 18 “a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) master problem”. However, when Eqs. (54)-(55) is put in Eqs. (6)-(7), the terms related to integer variable seem to be nonlinear. The MINLP problem presented in this manuscript is not like the form mentioned above, it does not always guarantee to get solution with the outer approximation algorithm. It seems that the MINLP model presented in this manuscript is not strict. 第一个审稿人的意见我进行了修改，关键的第二个审稿人关于算法的疑问，我找到了两篇发表的论文可以进行佐证，并且论文中采用的DICOPT算法的说明书中指出改算法经过改进后可以处理我的论文中的这种情况。 于是我把第一篇小论文修改后改投的其他杂志。 我的第二篇论文建模部分跟第一篇完全一样，但是第一篇文章是单目标，第二篇是多目标优化，用到的算法、研究内容和结果讨论都不一样。这样算不算一稿多投？第二篇文章再投JMS还有希望么？cover letter怎么写比较合适呢？ 谢谢大家了！ [ Last edited by avast2009 on 2012-5-27 at 09:37 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
40+中年人失业后，还能找到好工作吗？
已经有13人回复
-
用NBS溴化时溶剂除了CCl4外还有什么
已经有6人回复
-
申请科研项目纯靠实力能成功吗？
已经有11人回复
-
极限拉扯，如何抉择
已经有15人回复
-
二审4个多月了还是Awaiting Reviewer Scores
已经有4人回复
-
OpenAI又攻克数学难题了，离AI做有机合成还有多远？
已经有13人回复
-
课题组会帮你通过考核么？
已经有7人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有9人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有10人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- JMS编辑拒稿怎么办，求助！！
已经有11人回复
- 投稿 JMS，1天后变成 Decision in process
已经有3人回复
- JMS投稿，编辑的回信
已经有7人回复
- 第一次投sci被拒，改投同一出版社另一个杂志，要不要说明曾被拒稿？
已经有12人回复
- PRB投稿，文章到审稿人手上一个多月还没消息，正常吗？
已经有8人回复
- JMS直接被主编拒稿
已经有7人回复
- APL投稿被拒，但编辑和审稿人均建议投到JAP，中的几率有多大？
已经有9人回复
- 请问PRL的投稿状态
已经有3人回复
- JMS审稿十天结束，什么情况？
已经有17人回复
- 审稿意见中要补充文献，可是到哪里找啊？
已经有8人回复
- 稿件曲折的经历JAP->JMS->APL->PRL->PRB终于中了
已经有12人回复
- 投JMS被拒，改投哪些期刊好啊？
已经有7人回复
- JMS 的文章要求大修但却没有具体审稿意见
已经有13人回复
- 谈谈我们投APL的坎坷经历
已经有8人回复
- JMS的文章修改意见来了，在加参考文献这条上犯难了！
已经有40人回复
2楼2012-05-27 10:05:38
3楼2012-05-29 10:36:44
200