| ²é¿´: 863 | »Ø¸´: 2 | |||
Ë÷Äá¿Ë´óÈËÌú³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[½»Á÷]
µÚһƪÂÛÎÄͶJMS±»¾Üºó£¬ÏàͬģÐÍÄÚÈݲ»Í¬µÄÎÄÕ£¨µÚһƪµÄÑÓÐø¹¤×÷£©ÔÙͶJMSÓÐϷô ÒÑÓÐ2È˲ÎÓë
|
|
ÄÚÈݽϳ¤£¬Çë¸÷λº£º£¡ µÚһƪÂÛÎÄͶJMS±»¾Üºó£¬±à¼¸ø³öµÄ¾Ü¸åÐÅ£º I have received two reports on this manuscript from well-established reviewers. I have read their comments and find that they raise some very valid concerns. On one hand, it appears that not all the important parameters are accounted for in the cost estimation, and on the other hand, some flaws in the algorithms cast some doubts on the actual result. I admit that the prediction of performance and cost of Membrane systems is a difficult exercise, but in the present case, I think this submission cannot be published as a research paper for the reasons mentioned here above. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have questions on this file. Á½¸öÉó¸åÈ˵IJ¿·ÖÒâ¼û Reviewer #1: The article has two main items namely predicting/calculation performance of RO systems and cost of the produced water. The cost calculations have no added value. Main reason is that the input is far from complete and far from correct e.g. pre-treatment cost are not included and the cost of membrane elements are two times higher than actual cost. The performance predictions/calculations with the developed model suggest that the existing models used by e.g. Dow, Hydranautics and Toray don't exists or are inferior. This part could have given an added value if results obtained with the model were compared with the results of calculations done with the projection programs of the abovementioned companies. Results of an existing plant (source: publication) are compared with model calculations and concluded that the model is O.K. However it is not clear what exactly the input data were in this reference.And the comparison is marginally done. Recommend to rewriting the article and compare results obtained from the model and projection programs in detail for several situations. If the model fits it might be useful to publish and to making the program fully available for the desalination society. This has an added value since it is unknow how the projection programs do the calculations. Reviewer #2: This paper may be reviewed after incorporating following major revisions, some comments are listed as follow: 1. A structural diagram of membrane module should be given, which can describe the module model and symbols in Eqs. (1)-(4). ¡£¡£¡£ÖмäµÄÒâ¼û»ù±¾É϶¼ÊÇһЩ²»´óµÄ´íÎó 15. As far as I know, the outer approximation algorithm can solve the MINLP problem, which just likes the following form: Min cy + f(x) s.t. , c is constant where the binary variable y is linear, it is just as the statement in line 49 on page 18 ¡°a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) master problem¡±. However, when Eqs. (54)-(55) is put in Eqs. (6)-(7), the terms related to integer variable seem to be nonlinear. The MINLP problem presented in this manuscript is not like the form mentioned above, it does not always guarantee to get solution with the outer approximation algorithm. It seems that the MINLP model presented in this manuscript is not strict. µÚÒ»¸öÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼ûÎÒ½øÐÐÁËÐ޸ģ¬¹Ø¼üµÄµÚ¶þ¸öÉó¸åÈ˹ØÓÚËã·¨µÄÒÉÎÊ£¬ÎÒÕÒµ½ÁËÁ½Æª·¢±íµÄÂÛÎÄ¿ÉÒÔ½øÐÐ×ôÖ¤£¬²¢ÇÒÂÛÎÄÖвÉÓõÄDICOPTËã·¨µÄ˵Ã÷ÊéÖÐÖ¸³ö¸ÄËã·¨¾¹ý¸Ä½øºó¿ÉÒÔ´¦ÀíÎÒµÄÂÛÎÄÖеÄÕâÖÖÇé¿ö¡£ ÓÚÊÇÎҰѵÚһƪСÂÛÎÄÐ޸ĺó¸ÄͶµÄÆäËûÔÓÖ¾¡£ ÎҵĵڶþƪÂÛÎĽ¨Ä£²¿·Ö¸úµÚһƪÍêȫһÑù£¬µ«ÊǵÚһƪÎÄÕÂÊǵ¥Ä¿±ê£¬µÚ¶þƪÊǶàÄ¿±êÓÅ»¯£¬Óõ½µÄËã·¨¡¢Ñо¿ÄÚÈݺͽá¹ûÌÖÂÛ¶¼²»Ò»Ñù¡£ÕâÑùËã²»ËãÒ»¸å¶àͶ£¿µÚ¶þƪÎÄÕÂÔÙͶJMS»¹ÓÐÏ£Íûô£¿cover letterÔõôд±È½ÏºÏÊÊÄØ£¿ лл´ó¼ÒÁË£¡ [ Last edited by avast2009 on 2012-5-27 at 09:37 ] |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
327Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
361Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ÖÐÄÏ´óѧ»¯Ñ§Ñ§Ë¶0703×Ü·Ö337Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸±±¾©»¯¹¤´óѧ 070300 ѧ˶ 336·Ö Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏרҵÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
341Çóµ÷¼Á(Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ºþÄÏ´óѧ070300)
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
0854 ¿¼Ñе÷¼Á ÕÐÉúÁË£¡AI ·½Ïò
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
384Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
ÉúÎïѧѧ˶Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
081700 µ÷¼Á 267·Ö
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
JMS±à¼¾Ü¸åÔõô°ì£¬ÇóÖú£¡£¡
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
Ͷ¸å JMS£¬1Ììºó±ä³É Decision in process
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
JMSͶ¸å£¬±à¼µÄ»ØÐÅ
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
µÚÒ»´ÎͶsci±»¾Ü£¬¸ÄͶͬһ³ö°æÉçÁíÒ»¸öÔÓÖ¾£¬Òª²»ÒªËµÃ÷Ôø±»¾Ü¸å£¿
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
PRBͶ¸å£¬ÎÄÕµ½Éó¸åÈËÊÖÉÏÒ»¸ö¶àÔ»¹Ã»ÏûÏ¢£¬Õý³£Âð£¿
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
JMSÖ±½Ó±»Ö÷±à¾Ü¸å
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
APLͶ¸å±»¾Ü£¬µ«±à¼ºÍÉó¸åÈ˾ù½¨ÒéͶµ½JAP£¬Öеļ¸ÂÊÓжà´ó£¿
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
ÇëÎÊPRLµÄͶ¸å״̬
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
JMSÉó¸åÊ®Ìì½áÊø£¬Ê²Ã´Çé¿ö£¿
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
Éó¸åÒâ¼ûÖÐÒª²¹³äÎÄÏ×£¬¿ÉÊǵ½ÄÄÀïÕÒ°¡£¿
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
¸å¼þÇúÕ۵ľÀúJAP->JMS->APL->PRL->PRBÖÕÓÚÖÐÁË
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
ͶJMS±»¾Ü£¬¸ÄͶÄÄЩÆÚ¿¯ºÃ°¡£¿
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
JMS µÄÎÄÕÂÒªÇó´óÐÞµ«È´Ã»ÓоßÌåÉó¸åÒâ¼û
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
̸̸ÎÒÃÇͶAPLµÄ¿²¿À¾Àú
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
JMSµÄÎÄÕÂÐÞ¸ÄÒâ¼ûÀ´ÁË£¬ÔڼӲο¼ÎÄÏ×ÕâÌõÉÏ·¸ÄÑÁË£¡
ÒѾÓÐ40È˻ظ´
dyt_20
½ð³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 7 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 791.6
- É¢½ð: 188
- ºì»¨: 3
- Ìû×Ó: 291
- ÔÚÏß: 517.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 859248
- ×¢²á: 2009-09-28
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ½á¹¹ÌÕ´É
2Â¥2012-05-27 10:05:38
niatdyh
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 9 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 558.5
- É¢½ð: 55
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 440
- ÔÚÏß: 56Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 113596
- ×¢²á: 2005-11-22
- רҵ: ½ðÊô»ù¸´ºÏ²ÄÁÏ
3Â¥2012-05-29 10:36:44













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥