| 查看: 705 | 回复: 1 | |||
[交流]
(外刊)审稿人反馈的意见让我感到很难办!所以求助
|
|||
|
各位虫子好,好久没有发帖求助了。现在有机会了,呵呵(我倒是希望不要有这种机会,嘿嘿)。具体情况描述如下: 去年底投了一篇,论文中涉及采用FCM聚类算法确定T-S模型的前件(即模糊区划分)问题。 一审中,三个审稿人,第一个审稿人给出小修,第二、第三个审稿人给了大修。其中有两个意见让我觉得有点儿难以作答。如下: Reviewer # 2 一审意见中的第一条: 1. It is unclear why clustering approach is used in building T-S models where linear functions are used as rule consequences. In my view, clustering may be more suitable for Mamdani-type fuzzy systems. For T-S models, the issue is to find some (fuzzy) regions with approximate linear behavior. 我是这么作答的: It is true that clustering approach is usually applied to build Mnidani-type fuzzy systems. As the reviewer remarked, the issue for T-S models is to find some fuzzy regions with approximate linear behavior. Therefore, the clustering can also be used to find appreciated fuzzy partitioning for the data and then linear functional relationship between the inputs and output can be identified in each fuzzy partitioning using the membership degree matrix, see in [19 ~ 30], without claiming of completeness. 结果返回第二轮审稿意见,该审稿人给了小修,并只对以上问题不满意,意见如下: The paper has been revised for improvements according to the review comments. But one point still seems unclear, why did you use FCM in building Sugeno-type fuzzy models? For instance, consider a set of points created roughly in terms of y=2x. Such data points constitute a fuzzy region for making a Sugeno-type fuzzy rule. But, with large variation of x, it would be difficult to detect this fuzzy region using FCM. It would be nice if authors could discuss such issues in the second-revised version. 虫友们,问题一如上,我该如何作答?求助!谢谢!!! Reviewer #3 一审中的第一、第二条意见如下(即comment 1 和 comment 2): 1. In the clustering based learning algorithms, the key issue is how to handle the input and output effectively in clustering. The traditional input only clustering or input-output clustering (the approach used in the paper) have been regarded less effective, as the input data and output data plays a completely different roles in identification of fuzzy systems. The more updated approach are the output based clustering approach, see the related papers in this topic in xxxxx (xxxxx是审稿人给出的一些推荐文献). So what is the best way to distinguish the output and input data in clustering is a point needed to further thinking to see where the traditional input-output clustering is the best approach here。 2. The used input-output clustering approach is a mismatch between the input-output clustering and T-S fuzzy system modeling. The data you use for clustering are input-output pair (xi, yi) where the system you model are (xi, Li(xi) ), where Li(.) is a linear function. 就以上两条意见,我作答如下: 1. First of all, we agree with the reviewer’s view point. Indeed, it is important to take into account more information of the output in clustering, see the above literatures suggested by the reviewer (These literatures are added in the revised paper so as to complete the reviews of the paper.). The input-output clustering is also important and investigated, see in [22-30], without claiming of completeness. In our current study, we consider the input-output clustering. In further, we will extend the xxxx(我论文提出的一种改版FCM算法) by considering more information of the output variable. Thanks the reviewer’s recommendation. 2.The FCM algorithm proposed in our paper is implemented on the input-output data pair (xi, yi), and it is used to establish T-S model for a given system when the data samples (xi, yi) can be observed from such system. In both two cases, data pair is (xi, yi). Li(.) is the linear behavior that should be identified in each fuzzy region. Therefore, there maybe exists no mismatch. Note that xi maybe include some information of output y, see the Examples 2 and 3 in the revised manuscript. 结果返回第二轮审稿意见,该审稿人也给了小修,并只对以上两个问题不满意,意见如下: Although the revised manuscript has made some improvements in responding the reviewers’ comments, the main comments (comments 1 and 2) in my original review report have not been addressed properly. In particular, my original comment 2 is basically the same as Comment 1 by Reviewer 2. So at least the authors should make some real effort to address this issue! 个人感觉审稿人有点儿不耐烦啦。虽然我个人自我感觉对FCM算法及T-S模型比较熟悉,但还是觉得有点难以回答。请教虫子们。 针对以上问题,我不知如何回答妥贴。请教了! 编辑让我两周内返回修改稿我和修改意见。请虫子们给与帮助。不胜感谢。 |
» 猜你喜欢
289 分105500药学专硕求调剂(找B区学校)
已经有5人回复
291求调剂
已经有11人回复
304求调剂
已经有8人回复
求调剂推荐
已经有9人回复
B区0809 ,数一英一,290 求调剂
已经有5人回复
求调剂
已经有12人回复
291求调剂
已经有13人回复
085404 22408 309分求调剂
已经有11人回复
求调剂
已经有7人回复
有没有接收比较快的sci期刊呀,最好在一个月之内的,研三孩子求毕业
已经有6人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
求助:如觉得审稿人提的意见不完全对,那该如何回复审稿人啊?
已经有8人回复
【求助】审稿人问:光电倍增管的响应是什么?
已经有9人回复
求助,审稿人是让我把论文中的数据交给编辑部挂到网上去吗?
已经有2人回复
【求助】求大家帮我看看审稿人让我算的的是什么性质.
已经有6人回复
重金求助如何回答审稿人提出的改投它刊的建议
已经有14人回复
加个新问题 ACS applied materials & interfaces 达审稿人意见求助
已经有13人回复
【求助】审稿人意见,不是很懂,大家帮帮忙!
已经有21人回复
推荐的一个审稿人明显让他的学生来审稿,意见直接影响编辑决定,有必要申诉吗
已经有18人回复
有一个审稿人的意见,很郁闷,不知道怎么回,大家来帮帮忙啊!
已经有14人回复
审稿人意见求助,怎么回答呢
已经有11人回复
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
广东石油化工学院环境工程专业硕士生,大类07,08,09都可以调剂,先到先得!
+1/484
科研需求-硫化镍钴精矿样品
+1/399
封闭系统的熵守恒悖论
+1/188
济南大学-先进建筑材料教育部工程研究中心-大牛团队-26届博士生申请
+1/179
双一流南京医科大学招计算机、生物信息等方向研究生调剂
+1/134
工学门类(前两位代码08)满足国家考研A区工科门类分数线要求的同学看过来
+1/49
桂林理工大学物理学专业招收调剂,还有三个名额!!!
+1/41
生物与医药(生物技术与工程领域)调剂还剩最后一小时,请抓紧时间,
+1/34
致中山白雪:于法理与人间,赴一场双向奔赴
+1/27
大家好,请教个问题,连续挤出胶皮,有没有在线降低气味VOC的方式。
+1/19
南京林业大学-国家级青年人才团队 招2026级申请考核制博士 (有机合成化学方向)
+1/15
中科院2区Top期刊IJBM(IF=8.5)征稿-截止到4月底
+2/10
中南林院士团队 招 生物质能源与材料 博士生
+1/7
中科院物理所李泓/吉林大学毛慧灿团队联合诚聘博士后
+1/6
广东石油化工学院刘诗咏教授团队化学化工、材料科学等方向尚有调剂名额
+1/6
广东省环境科学研究院招聘【新污染物】研究方向【博士】一名
+1/5
文献求助
+1/3
西安工程大学环境与化学工程学院学硕调剂(专硕可调学硕)
+1/2
中国农业大学资源与环境学院 - 招聘杰出人才、青年研究员、优秀人才和博士后
+1/2
山东科技大学×中国地质调查局成都地质调查中心招收2026级硕士联培生
+1/2
简单回复
2012-05-23 08:30
回复













回复此楼