| 查看: 691 | 回复: 1 | |||
[交流]
(外刊)审稿人反馈的意见让我感到很难办!所以求助
|
|||
|
各位虫子好,好久没有发帖求助了。现在有机会了,呵呵(我倒是希望不要有这种机会,嘿嘿)。具体情况描述如下: 去年底投了一篇,论文中涉及采用FCM聚类算法确定T-S模型的前件(即模糊区划分)问题。 一审中,三个审稿人,第一个审稿人给出小修,第二、第三个审稿人给了大修。其中有两个意见让我觉得有点儿难以作答。如下: Reviewer # 2 一审意见中的第一条: 1. It is unclear why clustering approach is used in building T-S models where linear functions are used as rule consequences. In my view, clustering may be more suitable for Mamdani-type fuzzy systems. For T-S models, the issue is to find some (fuzzy) regions with approximate linear behavior. 我是这么作答的: It is true that clustering approach is usually applied to build Mnidani-type fuzzy systems. As the reviewer remarked, the issue for T-S models is to find some fuzzy regions with approximate linear behavior. Therefore, the clustering can also be used to find appreciated fuzzy partitioning for the data and then linear functional relationship between the inputs and output can be identified in each fuzzy partitioning using the membership degree matrix, see in [19 ~ 30], without claiming of completeness. 结果返回第二轮审稿意见,该审稿人给了小修,并只对以上问题不满意,意见如下: The paper has been revised for improvements according to the review comments. But one point still seems unclear, why did you use FCM in building Sugeno-type fuzzy models? For instance, consider a set of points created roughly in terms of y=2x. Such data points constitute a fuzzy region for making a Sugeno-type fuzzy rule. But, with large variation of x, it would be difficult to detect this fuzzy region using FCM. It would be nice if authors could discuss such issues in the second-revised version. 虫友们,问题一如上,我该如何作答?求助!谢谢!!! Reviewer #3 一审中的第一、第二条意见如下(即comment 1 和 comment 2): 1. In the clustering based learning algorithms, the key issue is how to handle the input and output effectively in clustering. The traditional input only clustering or input-output clustering (the approach used in the paper) have been regarded less effective, as the input data and output data plays a completely different roles in identification of fuzzy systems. The more updated approach are the output based clustering approach, see the related papers in this topic in xxxxx (xxxxx是审稿人给出的一些推荐文献). So what is the best way to distinguish the output and input data in clustering is a point needed to further thinking to see where the traditional input-output clustering is the best approach here。 2. The used input-output clustering approach is a mismatch between the input-output clustering and T-S fuzzy system modeling. The data you use for clustering are input-output pair (xi, yi) where the system you model are (xi, Li(xi) ), where Li(.) is a linear function. 就以上两条意见,我作答如下: 1. First of all, we agree with the reviewer’s view point. Indeed, it is important to take into account more information of the output in clustering, see the above literatures suggested by the reviewer (These literatures are added in the revised paper so as to complete the reviews of the paper.). The input-output clustering is also important and investigated, see in [22-30], without claiming of completeness. In our current study, we consider the input-output clustering. In further, we will extend the xxxx(我论文提出的一种改版FCM算法) by considering more information of the output variable. Thanks the reviewer’s recommendation. 2.The FCM algorithm proposed in our paper is implemented on the input-output data pair (xi, yi), and it is used to establish T-S model for a given system when the data samples (xi, yi) can be observed from such system. In both two cases, data pair is (xi, yi). Li(.) is the linear behavior that should be identified in each fuzzy region. Therefore, there maybe exists no mismatch. Note that xi maybe include some information of output y, see the Examples 2 and 3 in the revised manuscript. 结果返回第二轮审稿意见,该审稿人也给了小修,并只对以上两个问题不满意,意见如下: Although the revised manuscript has made some improvements in responding the reviewers’ comments, the main comments (comments 1 and 2) in my original review report have not been addressed properly. In particular, my original comment 2 is basically the same as Comment 1 by Reviewer 2. So at least the authors should make some real effort to address this issue! 个人感觉审稿人有点儿不耐烦啦。虽然我个人自我感觉对FCM算法及T-S模型比较熟悉,但还是觉得有点难以回答。请教虫子们。 针对以上问题,我不知如何回答妥贴。请教了! 编辑让我两周内返回修改稿我和修改意见。请虫子们给与帮助。不胜感谢。 |
» 猜你喜欢
085700资源与环境308求调剂
已经有7人回复
265求调剂
已经有5人回复
279分求调剂 一志愿211
已经有3人回复
求调剂
已经有3人回复
一志愿吉林大学材料学硕321求调剂
已经有12人回复
286分人工智能专业请求调剂愿意跨考!
已经有3人回复
329求调剂
已经有5人回复
申请回稿延期一个月,编辑同意了。但系统上的时间没变,给编辑又写邮件了,没回复
已经有4人回复
材料学硕318求调剂
已经有5人回复
一志愿中国海洋大学,生物学,301分,求调剂
已经有6人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
求助:如觉得审稿人提的意见不完全对,那该如何回复审稿人啊?
已经有8人回复
【求助】审稿人问:光电倍增管的响应是什么?
已经有9人回复
求助,审稿人是让我把论文中的数据交给编辑部挂到网上去吗?
已经有2人回复
【求助】求大家帮我看看审稿人让我算的的是什么性质.
已经有6人回复
重金求助如何回答审稿人提出的改投它刊的建议
已经有14人回复
加个新问题 ACS applied materials & interfaces 达审稿人意见求助
已经有13人回复
【求助】审稿人意见,不是很懂,大家帮帮忙!
已经有21人回复
推荐的一个审稿人明显让他的学生来审稿,意见直接影响编辑决定,有必要申诉吗
已经有18人回复
有一个审稿人的意见,很郁闷,不知道怎么回,大家来帮帮忙啊!
已经有14人回复
审稿人意见求助,怎么回答呢
已经有11人回复
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
山东征女友,坐标济南
+1/163
春天就该逛吃逛吃
+1/86
散金币,求好运,祝面上顺利!
+2/76
华南师范大学(211)博士招生- 电子、自动化、机械、生物学、物理相关专业
+2/42
上海交通大学机械与动力工程学院博士后招聘
+3/23
【2026考研调剂】南方科技大学-深圳理工大学联培 086000 免疫方向(26.9入学)
+1/16
南京林业大学-国家级青年人才团队 招2026级申请考核制博士(合成化学、植物化学方向)
+1/14
双一流硕士招生信息
+1/9
河南大学龚和贵教授2026年博士研究生招生
+1/7
青岛科技大学化工学院院士团队2026年拟招收全日制博士研究生1名
+1/7
福州大学国家级人才汤育欣教授课题组2026年招收”申请考核制“储能电池方向博士研究生
+1/6
新加坡国立大学药学系化学生物学课题组招PhD
+1/5
招收化工与材料学科点研究生
+1/4
MTI 380调剂
+1/3
北京高校副校长团队招收机械类,环境类学硕和专硕
+1/3
北京高校副校长团队招收机械类,环境类学硕和专硕
+1/2
西安交通大学生命学院智能化诊疗装备研究中心2026年博士生招生
+1/1
【2026年春季补录】厦门大学田中群院士/易骏教授纳米光子学团队招收2026年入学博士生
+1/1
上海交通大学化学化工学院张智涛课题组诚聘博士后
+1/1
重庆大学长江学者团队诚聘储能方向博士后
+1/1
简单回复
2012-05-23 08:30
回复













回复此楼