|
|
[交流]
请问这样回答审稿人的一个问题合适吗?请高手帮忙修改和指导。
reviewer#1:The manuscript has been very well drafted and its results are presented well. The concept of the study is well articulated and can be understood with a lot of easy. However the following remarks may boost the work being presented.
ⅰ) consider avoiding to start with numbers in sentences e.g 2 ml.
Answer: thank you very much for the suggestion, we have revised the whole paper and made 7 amendments in "Materials and Methods" section (page 3, line 16; page 4, line 20; page 5, line 18; page 5, line 21; page 6, line 2; page 6, line 3; page 6, line 4.).
也许可以更好地回答,请大家帮忙指正哦! |
» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
» 猜你喜欢
售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有6人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有6人回复
售一区SCI文章T0P,我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
某top大学教授说“能够在市场中兑现的能力才是真能力”无比同意!
已经有13人回复
同一个分子,一条来自文献,一条来自AI——不告诉你答案,你会选哪条?
已经有7人回复
售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
查看全部散金贴
|