| 查看: 1412 | 回复: 9 | |||
| 本帖产生 1 个 ESEPI ，点击这里进行查看 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
zhaokan123金虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
Which is better, traditional Chinese characters or simplified Chinese characters
|
||
|
There is always an arguement about the use of traditional Chinese characters and simplified Chinese characters among we Chinese people. Some people argue that traditional Chinese characters, also known as the original coplex form of Chinese characters, should be applied the basic characters we use in our daily life, because these characters represent our history and traditional culture, which remind us who we are. A typical example goes to the calligraphy--a treasure we all cherish--which becomes meaningless in the form of simplified Chiese characters. However, there is also voices insist that simplified Chinese characters are better, as they are easier to learn, and most importantly, are time saving, which sparkles since we live in a rapidly developing world. They hold the opinion that those issues related to cuture and history should be protected by those people who doing the cutural and historical jobs, rather than we common people. So, what is your opinion on it? [ Last edited by zhaokan123 on 2012-2-4 at 15:43 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
296求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
0703化学调剂
已经有13人回复
-
085600材料与化工 求调剂
已经有15人回复
-
085700资源与环境308求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
生物学调剂招人！！！
已经有4人回复
-
0817 化学工程 299分求调剂 有科研经历 有二区文章
已经有17人回复
-
一志愿武汉理工材料工程专硕调剂
已经有5人回复
-
0856调剂，是学校就去
已经有7人回复
-
申博26年
已经有3人回复
-
一志愿吉林大学材料学硕321求调剂
已经有10人回复
zhaokan123
金虫 (正式写手)
- ESEPI: 2
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 866.5
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 594
- 在线: 112.1小时
- 虫号: 537892
- 注册: 2008-04-02
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 合成药物化学
|
There also exists an opposite opinion exists in me. Why Chinese language can't become an international one like English? Except for the difference between the power of the goverments, the characters itself is responsible as well. As we all know, Chinese characters are pictographic character, it is impossible to extract units of the words, which make these characters easier to comprehend. On the countary, English words consist of letters, and they are simplified symbols. To summarize my perspective, characters, as a tool, the easier, the better; but as a surppot of culture, the more original, the better. |
7楼2012-02-05 14:41:53
poyoro
木虫 (文坛精英)
- ESEPI: 13
- 应助: 3 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 1.05
- 金币: 1492.8
- 散金: 12871
- 红花: 23
- 沙发: 209
- 帖子: 10651
- 在线: 1172.7小时
- 虫号: 589231
- 注册: 2008-08-29
|
Meaningless argument. Whether TCC or SCC up to you, both views have their own reason to support the argument. I wonder is it really important for us to debate which one is the better,which one is suit for us. Do the people who use TCC know the historical and cultural information?Do the people who use SCC are in times front row ,or they had forget who they are? Do they care about the calligraph's meaning? Funny. |
4楼2012-02-05 00:47:10
5楼2012-02-05 02:34:23
zhaokan123
金虫 (正式写手)
- ESEPI: 2
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 866.5
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 594
- 在线: 112.1小时
- 虫号: 537892
- 注册: 2008-04-02
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 合成药物化学
|
I might not have expressed my opinion clearly enough, but this debate is not a meaningless one. In fact, the society has its tendency, for example, SCC occupied our print or internet or TV show. Thus, it is not up to us individuals to make a choice between TCC and SCC. Many people insist that TCC should be dominant in these areas. TCC may not necessarily promote our awareness of art or history, but Calligraphy is expressed in the form of TCC, and many ancient books involve words that SCC does not full addressed. Unfortunately, under a SCC environment, we may have less chance to know about TCC. |
6楼2012-02-05 14:25:44
