| 查看: 1398 | 回复: 9 | |||
| 本帖产生 1 个 ESEPI ，点击这里进行查看 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
zhaokan123金虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
Which is better, traditional Chinese characters or simplified Chinese characters
|
||
|
There is always an arguement about the use of traditional Chinese characters and simplified Chinese characters among we Chinese people. Some people argue that traditional Chinese characters, also known as the original coplex form of Chinese characters, should be applied the basic characters we use in our daily life, because these characters represent our history and traditional culture, which remind us who we are. A typical example goes to the calligraphy--a treasure we all cherish--which becomes meaningless in the form of simplified Chiese characters. However, there is also voices insist that simplified Chinese characters are better, as they are easier to learn, and most importantly, are time saving, which sparkles since we live in a rapidly developing world. They hold the opinion that those issues related to cuture and history should be protected by those people who doing the cutural and historical jobs, rather than we common people. So, what is your opinion on it? [ Last edited by zhaokan123 on 2012-2-4 at 15:43 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
依托企业入选了国家启明计划青年人才。有无高校可以引进的。
已经有14人回复
-
表哥与省会女结婚，父母去帮带孩子被省会女气回家生重病了
已经有11人回复
-
江汉大学解明教授课题组招博士研究生/博士后
已经有3人回复
-
AI 太可怕了，写基金时，提出想法，直接生成的文字比自己想得深远，还有科学性
已经有11人回复
-
同年申请2项不同项目，第1个项目里不写第2个项目的信息，可以吗
已经有10人回复
-
依托企业入选了国家启明计划青年人才。有无高校可以引进的。
已经有11人回复
