| 查看: 1689 | 回复: 9 | |||
| 本帖产生 1 个 ESEPI ，点击这里进行查看 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
zhaokan123金虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
Which is better, traditional Chinese characters or simplified Chinese characters
|
||
|
There is always an arguement about the use of traditional Chinese characters and simplified Chinese characters among we Chinese people. Some people argue that traditional Chinese characters, also known as the original coplex form of Chinese characters, should be applied the basic characters we use in our daily life, because these characters represent our history and traditional culture, which remind us who we are. A typical example goes to the calligraphy--a treasure we all cherish--which becomes meaningless in the form of simplified Chiese characters. However, there is also voices insist that simplified Chinese characters are better, as they are easier to learn, and most importantly, are time saving, which sparkles since we live in a rapidly developing world. They hold the opinion that those issues related to cuture and history should be protected by those people who doing the cutural and historical jobs, rather than we common people. So, what is your opinion on it? [ Last edited by zhaokan123 on 2012-2-4 at 15:43 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有6人回复
zhaokan123
金虫 (正式写手)
- ESEPI: 2
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 866.5
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 594
- 在线: 112.1小时
- 虫号: 537892
- 注册: 2008-04-02
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 合成药物化学
|
Wow, it is interesting to know about pictographs in English words, thank you  Well, English words are made up of 26 letters, it is rather easier to learn the spelling of each words. But for Chinese character, it is difficult to remember where to put the horizontal stoke, the downwards-left concave stroke, let alone the anfractuose strokes. |
10楼2012-02-06 15:34:37
poyoro
木虫 (文坛精英)
- ESEPI: 13
- 应助: 3 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 1.05
- 金币: 1492.8
- 散金: 12871
- 红花: 23
- 沙发: 209
- 帖子: 10651
- 在线: 1172.7小时
- 虫号: 589231
- 注册: 2008-08-29
|
Meaningless argument. Whether TCC or SCC up to you, both views have their own reason to support the argument. I wonder is it really important for us to debate which one is the better,which one is suit for us. Do the people who use TCC know the historical and cultural information?Do the people who use SCC are in times front row ,or they had forget who they are? Do they care about the calligraph's meaning? Funny. |
4楼2012-02-05 00:47:10
5楼2012-02-05 02:34:23
zhaokan123
金虫 (正式写手)
- ESEPI: 2
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 866.5
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 594
- 在线: 112.1小时
- 虫号: 537892
- 注册: 2008-04-02
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 合成药物化学
|
I might not have expressed my opinion clearly enough, but this debate is not a meaningless one. In fact, the society has its tendency, for example, SCC occupied our print or internet or TV show. Thus, it is not up to us individuals to make a choice between TCC and SCC. Many people insist that TCC should be dominant in these areas. TCC may not necessarily promote our awareness of art or history, but Calligraphy is expressed in the form of TCC, and many ancient books involve words that SCC does not full addressed. Unfortunately, under a SCC environment, we may have less chance to know about TCC. |
6楼2012-02-05 14:25:44
40