| 查看: 748 | 回复: 5 | ||
[求助]
激发态计算
|
| 问题是这样的，一篇文章写到excited at 340nm，那我做计算的话，激发态是不是该选与这个值比较接近的root来做激发态的优化，进而计算荧光？而不去考虑计算中的谐振强度f的大小。也就是说已经有了实验激发波长的话该如何计算荧光呢？在此先谢过各位了。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
东方理-中科大联合博士生招聘
已经有0人回复
-
钴酸锂半电池小倍率容量上不去
已经有1人回复
-
物理化学论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有243人回复
-
吉林大学材料物理本科生求问调剂信息
已经有24人回复
-
2026第二届光电子与半导体器件前沿技术研讨会——光电子赋能·半导体创芯！
已经有1人回复
-
光电子赋能·半导体创芯！
已经有1人回复
-
光电子赋能·半导体创芯！
已经有0人回复
-
QE计算电声耦合的时候报错Error in routine lambda (100)wrong or too many modes
已经有2人回复
-
cif求助下载
已经有1人回复
-
高效微纳米储能材料与产业化推进实验室 苏州 招收硕士研究生（含调剂）
已经有2人回复
-
高效微纳米储能材料与产业化推进实验室 苏州 招收硕士研究生（含调剂）
已经有0人回复
2楼2011-12-26 01:28:13
3楼2011-12-26 16:43:25
【答案】应助回帖
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
|
in the experiment, we usaually use single excitation to irradiate the sample to get the emission spectrum, such as flourescence and phosphorescence. In this case, I will calculate the UV-Vis absorption of the ground state molecule to see if there is overlap between the calculated absorption band and exictation light at 340nm. I believe there is. The phosphorescence is the emission spectrum from triplet state T1 to ground state. so, no matter what the excitation light you used, if there is phosphorescence emission, the spectrum should be the same for the same molecule. this is my 2 cents. |
4楼2011-12-28 00:24:38
5楼2011-12-28 19:27:45
【答案】应助回帖
|
The absorption and emission of light direct correlate to the energy differences between the state. Think about how can you get the full uv-vis absorption spectrum from calculation for a molecule. For emission, we match the first excitation to the experimental data. (I might be wrong.) If you read something about dual photon excitation, that will give you a better understanding to your question. |
6楼2011-12-28 21:56:10
30