| 查看: 845 | 回复: 5 | ||
[求助]
激发态计算
|
| 问题是这样的,一篇文章写到excited at 340nm,那我做计算的话,激发态是不是该选与这个值比较接近的root来做激发态的优化,进而计算荧光?而不去考虑计算中的谐振强度f的大小。也就是说已经有了实验激发波长的话该如何计算荧光呢?在此先谢过各位了。 |
» 猜你喜欢
分子筛催化方向 一篇cej共一第一 可以申请上海什么学校呢
已经有4人回复
求助共晶分子筛的电镜图分析,有偿
已经有1人回复
物理化学论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有204人回复
中南大学化学化工学院招收电池储能、理论计算方向博士生
已经有16人回复
请问哪里可以代烧带压力的炉子?
已经有6人回复
关于合成MIL-125的求助
已经有0人回复
双非本硕光催化方向想读博,请各位老师看看我!
已经有2人回复
瑞典林雪平大学范立洲课题组现招聘博士后、岗位制博士生
已经有0人回复
面上再次挂了,太难了,躺也躺不了,倦也卷不过,小学校之殇!
已经有31人回复
中国科大仿生界面材料科学全国重点实验室戴懿涛研究员/江雷院士团队招聘科研助理
已经有0人回复
中国科大仿生界面材料科学全国重点实验室戴懿涛研究员/江雷院士团队招聘科研助理
已经有0人回复
2楼2011-12-26 01:28:13
3楼2011-12-26 16:43:25
【答案】应助回帖
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
|
in the experiment, we usaually use single excitation to irradiate the sample to get the emission spectrum, such as flourescence and phosphorescence. In this case, I will calculate the UV-Vis absorption of the ground state molecule to see if there is overlap between the calculated absorption band and exictation light at 340nm. I believe there is. The phosphorescence is the emission spectrum from triplet state T1 to ground state. so, no matter what the excitation light you used, if there is phosphorescence emission, the spectrum should be the same for the same molecule. this is my 2 cents. |
4楼2011-12-28 00:24:38
5楼2011-12-28 19:27:45
【答案】应助回帖
|
The absorption and emission of light direct correlate to the energy differences between the state. Think about how can you get the full uv-vis absorption spectrum from calculation for a molecule. For emission, we match the first excitation to the experimental data. (I might be wrong.) If you read something about dual photon excitation, that will give you a better understanding to your question. |
6楼2011-12-28 21:56:10










回复此楼