| 查看: 849 | 回复: 5 | ||
[求助]
激发态计算
|
| 问题是这样的，一篇文章写到excited at 340nm，那我做计算的话，激发态是不是该选与这个值比较接近的root来做激发态的优化，进而计算荧光？而不去考虑计算中的谐振强度f的大小。也就是说已经有了实验激发波长的话该如何计算荧光呢？在此先谢过各位了。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
河南理工大学化工学院招收调剂生啦！
已经有1人回复
-
中国电机工程学报的投稿系统
已经有0人回复
-
物理化学论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有98人回复
-
招收博士一名-宁波大学
已经有0人回复
-
厦门大学侯旭团队招聘青年教师、博士后及博硕士研究生
已经有2人回复
-
哈工大深圳 表界面物理化学方向（胶体与界面，光谱探测研究） 博士招生
已经有0人回复
-
元素硫的化合价和氧化态
已经有1人回复
-
江苏科技大学2026年招聘启事
已经有1人回复
-
International Journal of Nanoscience属于中科院4区吗？
已经有0人回复
-
澳大利亚南昆士兰大学量子点课题组招收博士生
已经有0人回复
2楼2011-12-26 01:28:13
3楼2011-12-26 16:43:25
【答案】应助回帖
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
|
in the experiment, we usaually use single excitation to irradiate the sample to get the emission spectrum, such as flourescence and phosphorescence. In this case, I will calculate the UV-Vis absorption of the ground state molecule to see if there is overlap between the calculated absorption band and exictation light at 340nm. I believe there is. The phosphorescence is the emission spectrum from triplet state T1 to ground state. so, no matter what the excitation light you used, if there is phosphorescence emission, the spectrum should be the same for the same molecule. this is my 2 cents. |
4楼2011-12-28 00:24:38
5楼2011-12-28 19:27:45
【答案】应助回帖
|
The absorption and emission of light direct correlate to the energy differences between the state. Think about how can you get the full uv-vis absorption spectrum from calculation for a molecule. For emission, we match the first excitation to the experimental data. (I might be wrong.) If you read something about dual photon excitation, that will give you a better understanding to your question. |
6楼2011-12-28 21:56:10
