| 查看: 919 | 回复: 5 | ||
[求助]
激发态计算
|
| 问题是这样的，一篇文章写到excited at 340nm，那我做计算的话，激发态是不是该选与这个值比较接近的root来做激发态的优化，进而计算荧光？而不去考虑计算中的谐振强度f的大小。也就是说已经有了实验激发波长的话该如何计算荧光呢？在此先谢过各位了。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
申请2027年材料/化学类博士
已经有7人回复
-
求相关合成条件
已经有14人回复
-
物理化学论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有115人回复
-
2027春季申博自荐
已经有6人回复
-
青基的材料青椒们，可以把硕士联培生送我这里，要研二男生
已经有69人回复
-
申博
已经有2人回复
-
核磁分析求助
已经有5人回复
-
有偿核磁分析求助
已经有1人回复
-
2027申博自荐-木质衍生电磁波吸收材料方向
已经有6人回复
-
highscore plus3.0报错
已经有0人回复
2楼2011-12-26 01:28:13
3楼2011-12-26 16:43:25
【答案】应助回帖
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
|
in the experiment, we usaually use single excitation to irradiate the sample to get the emission spectrum, such as flourescence and phosphorescence. In this case, I will calculate the UV-Vis absorption of the ground state molecule to see if there is overlap between the calculated absorption band and exictation light at 340nm. I believe there is. The phosphorescence is the emission spectrum from triplet state T1 to ground state. so, no matter what the excitation light you used, if there is phosphorescence emission, the spectrum should be the same for the same molecule. this is my 2 cents. |
4楼2011-12-28 00:24:38
5楼2011-12-28 19:27:45
【答案】应助回帖
|
The absorption and emission of light direct correlate to the energy differences between the state. Think about how can you get the full uv-vis absorption spectrum from calculation for a molecule. For emission, we match the first excitation to the experimental data. (I might be wrong.) If you read something about dual photon excitation, that will give you a better understanding to your question. |
6楼2011-12-28 21:56:10