| 查看: 731 | 回复: 5 | ||
[求助]
激发态计算
|
| 问题是这样的，一篇文章写到excited at 340nm，那我做计算的话，激发态是不是该选与这个值比较接近的root来做激发态的优化，进而计算荧光？而不去考虑计算中的谐振强度f的大小。也就是说已经有了实验激发波长的话该如何计算荧光呢？在此先谢过各位了。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
QE计算电声耦合的时候报错Error in routine lambda (100)wrong or too many modes
已经有2人回复
-
分子动力学模拟合作需求
已经有0人回复
-
物理化学论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有170人回复
-
帮导师招2026CSC博士（巴塞罗那自治大学UAB-CSC博士项目）
已经有26人回复
-
有没有LIMS客户的资源，求推荐
已经有0人回复
-
福州大学梁宇航副教授招收2026年申核制博士研究生/硕士研究生（理论计算方向）
已经有21人回复
-
福州大学梁宇航副教授招收2026年申核制博士研究生/硕士研究生（理论计算方向）
已经有20人回复
-
深圳理工大学招聘AI4Science与分子模拟方向科研人员
已经有0人回复
2楼2011-12-26 01:28:13
3楼2011-12-26 16:43:25
【答案】应助回帖
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
|
in the experiment, we usaually use single excitation to irradiate the sample to get the emission spectrum, such as flourescence and phosphorescence. In this case, I will calculate the UV-Vis absorption of the ground state molecule to see if there is overlap between the calculated absorption band and exictation light at 340nm. I believe there is. The phosphorescence is the emission spectrum from triplet state T1 to ground state. so, no matter what the excitation light you used, if there is phosphorescence emission, the spectrum should be the same for the same molecule. this is my 2 cents. |
4楼2011-12-28 00:24:38
5楼2011-12-28 19:27:45
【答案】应助回帖
|
The absorption and emission of light direct correlate to the energy differences between the state. Think about how can you get the full uv-vis absorption spectrum from calculation for a molecule. For emission, we match the first excitation to the experimental data. (I might be wrong.) If you read something about dual photon excitation, that will give you a better understanding to your question. |
6楼2011-12-28 21:56:10
10