24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 932  |  回复: 2

wlzh0731251

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

[交流] 大家看看德国应用化学这样的审稿意见有必要申诉吗? 已有2人参与

只有一份审稿意见。谢谢大家评论。

Importance: D) important but too specialized

Hypotheses Yes/No: Yes

Appropriate Length: Yes

Different Journal: This work is to some extent technically novel and very useful and it should be published in a journal dealing with electrochemical processes and waste water treatment or in a green chemistry

Recommend Acceptance: D) No

Referee Letter: This is a nice paper reporting a quantitative study into ***. the system is demonstrated and shown to be effective ***.

The report is of good quality (some language editing required) and well written. Good quality figures are supplied. Publication is possible but Angew Chem I feel would require some additional level of novelty in terms of chemistry or materials. A journal with a more electrochemical or green chemistry focus would be a better option.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yaoyao145

木虫之王 (文学泰斗)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
牛刊就是这样 据的花样千奇百怪
2楼2011-10-27 12:45:48
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhenxiong

铜虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
没有必要申述。。。就是觉得你创新性不够。。。低一个等次的论文,应该可以接受
3楼2011-10-27 23:05:49
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 wlzh0731251 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见