|
|
[交流]
请帮忙看看审稿意见
以前都被拒，第一次收到revise的意见，两个审稿人：
Reviewer #1: The paper presents a valuable study on XXXXXX. This is an interesting paper, well written and presented. Taking into account both presentation and contributions this paper deserves to be considered for the publication on Knowledge-based systems.
Reviewer #2: Dear authors,
I found your paper very interesting, however, I have several suggestions to improve it:
(中间列了10多条意见，还算比较好改)，
-- suggestion 1
-- suggestion 2
.
.
.
-- suggestion n
可是，审稿人最后说：
In resume, I think it has merits enough to be accepted, but the writing could be improve to make it easier to understand, specially the rol of the experts in the article.
请问，最后一条总结性的怎么response啊，特别是“but the writing could be improve to make it easier to understand”， 这玩意儿咋改啊？？
BTW，这个属于major revise 还是minor revise啊？
[ Last edited by bear1984 on 2011-10-27 at 07:52 ] |
» 猜你喜欢
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
查看全部散金贴
|
回复此楼
+1/829
同一个分子，一条来自文献，一条来自AI——不告诉你答案，你会选哪条？
+3