24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1096  |  回复: 5
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

springs111

银虫 (正式写手)

[求助] Materials and Design修改后再审的意见

昨天收到修改后再审的审稿意见,感觉不是很好回答这样的问题,我想从3个方面回答:1)仔细对比实验数据没有问题,2)Mo的固溶强化对屈服强度的影响,在高温时要远明显与室温(RT),3)更多的深入的原因有待于更深入的研究!有经验的大侠分析,这样回答的是否可行。审稿人提的问题是大问题,还是小问题,修改后接受的机会大不大,谢谢!
另外,第一次审稿意见没有这一条的!

Reviewers' comments:
>
>
> Reviewer #1: In Fig.5, hardness of Fe-Mo-C steels at RT to 200℃ has a minimum value at 0.5wt% Mo.But the hardness of the steels increases at 300~600℃ with the increasing of Mo content. In Fig.6(a), the yield strength(YS)of Fe-Mo-C steels at RT also has a minimum value at 0.5wt% Mo. But the ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of the steels increases with the increasing of Mo content. Moreover, in Fig.6(b), YS and UTS of the steels increase with the increasing of Mo content at 600℃. And there is no minimum value at 0.5wt% Mo. Why do the properties of the steels have a minimum value at 0.5wt% Mo in some conditions? But there is no minimum value in other conditions.
>
>
> Reviewer #2: The paper can be considered to accept.
>

[ Last edited by springs111 on 2011-8-12 at 15:37 ]
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

chenkai773

木虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

springs111(金币+5): 谢谢,您的回答和鼓励! 2011-08-16 07:41:42
第二个审稿人都同意接受了,就没有问题了,那个问题好好回答下,尽自己最大努力回答接受就没问题~
5楼2011-08-15 21:58:57
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 springs111 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见