24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 3696  |  回复: 33
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

chenyang.co

金虫 (正式写手)

我以前很聪明的

[求助] 论文审稿回来,3个审稿人,已经修改提交了。不知道结果如何?大家评评

投了3M,三个审稿人,这是他们的总体意见
第一个审稿人(小修):
the paper is well-organized. Alhough the novelty of the paper is not so outstanding, the work is done in a systematic way. Before the can be accept, there are problems needing to revise:

第二个审稿人(小修):
I find the paper interesting. However, I have some comments. These are essential before considering for publication.I am satisfied from the description of the paper. Though discussion part is not very good. The references given are not discussed properly.

第三个审稿人(大修):
The manuscript treats a hot topic and it has the merit to keep alive the attention on this subject. This article can only be published after mandatory revision.

修改稿提交了10天了,还是with editor,大家认为如何啊。
我有些回答没有按照审稿人改,还有个审稿人给的意见是错的,直接反驳了。

慌张。。。慌张 ~~~~

[ Last edited by chenyang.co on 2011-8-1 at 07:01 ]
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

努力成为行业第一
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
34楼2011-08-01 16:14:28
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 chenyang.co 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见