24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2471  |  回复: 9

dewhjr

银虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] 论文被拒~大家看看问题出在哪儿呢 已有8人参与

在投稿系统显示论文“Required Review Complete”一个月零一天后的今天收到了主编的拒稿邮件(曾在7月10号左右发过邮件给主编希望他能尽快的返回审稿意见)。邮件中主编说是根据审稿人意见作出的拒稿决定,但我看审稿人意见,除了英语需要修改外,其它没啥大问题,比如增加实验。但主编直接就拒了,还拒的很彻底。个人觉得他拒的很牵强,感觉应该给个修改后再审的机会。我把主编的邮件和审稿人的意见附在下面,大家看看问题出在哪儿了呢。

主编:
Thank you for submitting your manuscript for possible publication in ×××.

Following are the reviews for your paper referenced above.  Based on the reviews, I regret that I cannot accept or further consider it for publication in ×××.  

Thank you for your interest in ×××.
Sincerely,
Dr. ×××
Editor-in-Chief
×××

主编返回的审稿人意见:

Reviewers' comments:
Reviewer #1: First, English should be improved, many errors and sentences are too long that lead to a misunderstand. This paper was presented a methud that its name is ×××. this methud Does not change much with the previous methud. But There is little innovation, Where used from two-dimensional ××× in conjunction with the ××× image denoising algorithm. Formula 7 in page 10, is not a new formula of estimators. This formula was used previously. Finally this paper With a small change can become a good article.
Sincerely,

Reviewer #3: In the paper, ××× is used for denoising images. ×××(对论文方法的描述). It is claimed that "The comparative experimental results for natural images and medical images show that the method introduced in the paper achieves better denoising performance, and that  the accuracy and computational cost of the ××× image denoising algorithm are all improved."
1. As far as I can see, the formulations used in the paper seem to be O.K.
2. But the language used in the paper needs to be highly corrected.  To show the locations of the linguistic mistakes, I attached a Word document in which the problematic  words and phrases are colored into yellow.  And probably there are more mistakes that I missed throughout the paper.
3. Instead of having a fixed 21x21 pixel search window, it would be interesting to see the effects of changing the window size.
4. In Table 1, as the author confessed, the method introduced in this paper does not outperform all other state-of-the art methods, but it still gives comparable performance results. Similar results are valid for Table 2.
5. It would be good to add the computation times of the method in Table 3 since it outperforms other denoising methods in PSNR every now and then.
6. Finally the last sentence in the "Abstract" should be corrected maybe by writing it as
"Finally, the comparative experimental results show that our method achieves better denoising performance in some  of the well known images and outperforms other methods in computational time in all images."

顺便提一句,审稿人2说他提供了一份指出我论文中语法错误之类的word文档,但主编咋个没有把这个文档返回给我呢...
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

从负开始。
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lele0131

金虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
应该给次修改的机会,充其量为大修,不妨申诉一下。祝愿好运!
无限风光在险峰!
2楼2011-07-20 18:56:19
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

永不放弃123

新虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
难道是楼主催稿的缘故吗?我只是猜测呵呵,楼主好好跟编辑沟通下,争取下吧,祝好运,同时也祈祷我的论文能有好的结果
3楼2011-07-20 19:43:40
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

永不放弃123

新虫 (正式写手)

难道是楼主催稿的缘故吗?我只是猜测呵呵,楼主好好跟编辑沟通下,争取下吧,祝好运,同时也祈祷我的论文能有好的结果
4楼2011-07-20 19:43:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

liunahan

木虫之王 (文学泰斗)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
第一个认为 认为你的文章新意不足,第二个人如果确实有专门的word提出语法问题,可见问题之严重。严重的语法和写作问题影射数据问题,第三是否和催稿有关系不好说。

[ Last edited by liunahan on 2011-7-20 at 19:59 ]
生活终究多彩
5楼2011-07-20 19:58:05
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhaocy8903

木虫 (知名作家)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
There is little innovation
这个很致命。如果是 a little还好点
6楼2011-07-20 20:17:13
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

fansire

木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
There is little innovation,意思就是说只有很少的(这在英语里是否定句啊楼主)创新点……这才是要命的!
7楼2011-07-20 20:28:54
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

kingsong

银虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
估计申诉也够呛。
改改重投吧。
8楼2011-07-20 20:40:10
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

shiningboy

木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
Originally posted by dewhjr at 2011-07-20 18:22:00:
在投稿系统显示论文“Required Review Complete”一个月零一天后的今天收到了主编的拒稿邮件(曾在7月10号左右发过邮件给主编希望他能尽快的返回审稿意见)。邮件中主编说是根据审稿人意见作出的拒稿决定,但我看 ...

猴急的后果,编辑掌握着生杀大权!
9楼2011-07-20 20:45:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

pcec

金虫 (小有名气)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
第一个reviewer 的意见很致命,创新性不足是直接reject的主要原因。
10楼2011-07-20 21:39:37
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 dewhjr 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 投票:  有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的? +14 爱看书的可乐 2026-08-26 16/800 2026-08-26 16:47 by skyjudy
[基金申请] 基金不中,共勉 +3 eulota 2026-08-26 3/150 2026-08-26 16:17 by 路yyyy
[基金申请] 怎么查啊 +5 huang1991js 2026-08-26 5/250 2026-08-26 16:09 by Equinoxhua
[基金申请] 我不理解! +8 Edward_pc 2026-08-26 13/650 2026-08-26 15:37 by Tide man
[基金申请] 2026国自然函评费到账 +22 羊腰板 2026-08-21 25/1250 2026-08-26 15:00 by zuocuiping
[基金申请] 2026年8月25日国自然放榜前突然收到列入评审专家邮件,有关系吗? +25 木水思豆 2026-08-25 28/1400 2026-08-26 14:53 by draco1987
[基金申请] 能否退出参与的面上项目解除限项 +23 koalala 2026-08-24 26/1300 2026-08-26 14:29 by 宝贝虫子
[基金申请] 科研孤儿太难了 +21 我4大白菜 2026-08-20 22/1100 2026-08-26 11:29 by nlgza
[基金申请] 国合里面能看到了 +7 一怀馨秋 2026-08-26 7/350 2026-08-26 11:23 by zhaosm1982
[基金申请] 国际合作可查了,中了面上 +18 Ldrop2023 2026-08-26 18/900 2026-08-26 11:15 by cmrandy
[基金申请] 系统进不去 +4 yanglien 2026-08-26 5/250 2026-08-26 11:10 by wenfengw83
[基金申请] 今天务委会开完了,明天出结果吗 +19 angus9576 2026-08-25 23/1150 2026-08-26 10:03 by zp519
[基金申请] 某些机构,以效率低为荣,以效率低作为存在感 +9 yuleib84 2026-08-25 10/500 2026-08-25 17:14 by alexon
[教师之家] 导师吐槽:我怎么摊上了这么个极品研究生! +3 苏东坡二世 2026-08-23 3/150 2026-08-25 10:35 by shisan1313
[基金申请] 建议基金发布提前给出明确的时间点 +13 kulium 2026-08-21 16/800 2026-08-24 16:27 by superceng
[基金申请] 让我中一个面上吧! +13 大萍1987 2026-08-20 16/800 2026-08-24 10:23 by 太傻了
[基金申请] 看来今天不会放榜了? +8 chengyan1220 2026-08-21 11/550 2026-08-21 17:52 by dcqxinyang
[基金申请] 时间戳又变了 +13 wuchongjun 2026-08-20 19/950 2026-08-21 17:21 by 紫杉醇
[基金申请] 应该是下周三26日公布了吧? +4 哈哈蛤? 2026-08-21 4/200 2026-08-21 10:58 by Vivilian
[基金申请] 基金啊基金 +4 longfie172 2026-08-20 4/200 2026-08-21 08:58 by mark mao
信息提示
请填处理意见